Classement général · échelle Ordo
Performance Elo — tournois maison
Cotes Ordo (fit global) depuis le PGN du laboratoire, complétées des moteurs dédiés figés. Cliquer un moteur ✱ fait défiler vers son débrief.
| Rang | Moteur / Système | Hardware | Elo | Parties | Err ± |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✱ Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3690 | 140 | ±17 |
| 2 | ✱ Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3681 | 140 | ±17 |
| 3 | ✱ Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3673 | 175 | ±15 |
| 4 | ✱ Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3672 | 120 | ±18 |
| 5 | ✱ Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3660 | 200 | ±14 |
| 6 | ✱ Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3655 | 100 | ±20 |
| 7 | ✱ Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3636 | 274 | ±12 |
| 8 | ✱ Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3557 | 355 | ±11 |
| 9 | ✱ Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3551 | 190 | ±14 |
| 10 | ✱ Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3530 | 198 | ±14 |
| 11 | ✱ Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3516 | 97 | ±20 |
| 12 | ✱ Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3515 | 215 | ±14 |
| 13 | ✱ Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3494 | 185 | ±15 |
| 14 | ✱ Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3476 | 130 | ±18 |
| 15 | ✱ Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3458 | 153 | ±16 |
| 16 | ✱ Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3454 | 180 | ±15 |
| 17 | ✱ Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3454 | 144 | ±17 |
| 18 | ✱ Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3448 | 338 | ±11 |
| 19 | ✱ Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3444 | 70 | ±24 |
| 20 | ✱ rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3414 | 179 | ±15 |
| 21 | ✱ Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3394 | 397 | ±10 |
| 22 | ✱ Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3378 | 180 | ±14 |
| 23 | ✱ Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3339 | 154 | ±16 |
| 24 | ✱ Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3338 | 180 | ±14 |
| 25 | ✱ Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3315 | 158 | ±16 |
| 26 | ✱ Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3259 | 143 | ±17 |
| 27 | ✱ Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3256 | 161 | ±16 |
| 28 | ✱ Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3185 | 81 | ±22 |
| 29 | ✱ Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3171 | 128 | ±18 |
| 30 | ✱ Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3167 | 108 | ±19 |
| 31 | ✱ Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3154 | 122 | ±18 |
| 32 | ✱ Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3038 | 121 | ±18 |
| 33 | ✱ Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 3001 | 102 | ±20 |
| 34 | ✱ Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2990 | 142 | ±17 |
| 35 | ✱ Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2915 | 120 | ±18 |
| 36 | ✱ Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2882 | 150 | ±16 |
| 37 | ✱ Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2849 | 229 | ±13 |
| 38 | ✱ Shredder 6 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2797 | 60 | ±26 |
| 39 | ✱ Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2787 | 90 | ±20 |
| 40 | ✱ Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2782 | 169 | ±15 |
| 41 | ✱ Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2771 | 90 | ±21 |
| 42 | ✱ ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2756 | 219 | ±13 |
| 43 | ✱ Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2752 | 103 | ±20 |
| 44 | ✱ Junior 8 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2741 | 138 | ±17 |
| 45 | ✱ Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2730 | 70 | ±24 |
| 46 | ✱ Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2727 | 118 | ±18 |
| 47 | ✱ Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2720 | 121 | ±18 |
| 48 | ✱ Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2719 | 186 | ±15 |
| 49 | ✱ Junior 7 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2699 | 189 | ±14 |
| 50 | ✱ Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2683 | 85 | ±22 |
| 51 | ✱ SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2670 | 193 | ±14 |
| 52 | ✱ List 512 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2666 | 212 | ±14 |
| 53 | ✱ Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2655 | 368 | ±10 |
| 54 | ✱ Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2611 | 171 | ±15 |
| 55 | ✱ Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2599 | 126 | ±18 |
| 56 | ✱ Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2589 | 195 | ±14 |
| 57 | ✱ Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2569 | 110 | ±19 |
| 58 | Cray Blitz 4.9h | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2531 | 70 | ±19 |
| 59 | ✱ Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2434 | 34 | ±31 |
| 60 | Mephisto Genius 68030 London | cb-emu | 2363 | 349 | ±13 |
| 61 | Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020 | cb-emu | 2315 | 349 | ±15 |
| 62 | Mephisto RISC II | cb-emu | 2266 | 342 | ±16 |
| 63 | Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 | cb-emu | 2247 | 348 | ±17 |
| 64 | Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2233 | 238 | ±21 |
| 65 | Novag Star Diamond (v1.04) | cb-emu | 2226 | 350 | ±17 |
| 66 | Saitek Sparc (rev.518) | cb-emu | 2153 | 347 | ±19 |
| 67 | Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03 | cb-emu | 2135 | 349 | ±19 |
| 68 | Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9 | cb-emu | 2125 | 350 | ±19 |
| 69 | Novag Sapphire | cb-emu | 2123 | 334 | ±20 |
| 70 | Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100% | 2108 | 264 | ±23 |
| 71 | Fidelity Designer Mach IV | cb-emu | 2090 | 350 | ±20 |
| 72 | Fidelity Designer Mach III | cb-emu | 2029 | 348 | ±21 |
| 73 | Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL | cb-emu | 1973 | 346 | ±21 |
| 74 | Novag Zircon II | cb-emu | 1970 | 334 | ±22 |
| 75 | Saitek President | cb-emu | 1958 | 344 | ±21 |
| 76 | Mephisto Nigel Short | cb-emu | 1956 | 349 | ±21 |
| 77 | Saitek Maestro D++ | cb-emu | 1923 | 348 | ±21 |
| 78 | Novag Super Forte C v3.6 | cb-emu | 1901 | 349 | ±21 |
| 79 | Novag Super Expert C v3.6 | cb-emu | 1894 | 349 | ±21 |
| 80 | Novag Turquoise | cb-emu | 1871 | 344 | ±21 |
| 81 | Saitek Corona II (ver. D+) | cb-emu | 1856 | 350 | ±21 |
| 82 | Mephisto Modena (set 3) | cb-emu | 1850 | 349 | ±21 |
| 83 | Saitek Turbo King II (D+) | cb-emu | 1844 | 348 | ±21 |
| 84 | Mephisto MM V (v5.1) | cb-emu | 1835 | 350 | ±21 |
| 85 | Mephisto MM IV (v7.10) | cb-emu | 1808 | 348 | ±21 |
| 86 | Fidelity Designer 2100 | cb-emu | 1808 | 348 | ±21 |
| 87 | Novag Constellation Forte A | cb-emu | 1803 | 350 | ±21 |
| 88 | Saitek Simultano (ver. B) | cb-emu | 1764 | 349 | ±20 |
| 89 | Fidelity Par Excellence (B) | cb-emu | 1742 | 347 | ±20 |
| 90 | Saitek Prisma | cb-emu | 1724 | 349 | ±19 |
| 91 | Fidelity Designer 2000 | cb-emu | 1703 | 348 | ±19 |
| 92 | Novag Super VIP v3.7 | cb-emu | 1640 | 348 | ±17 |
| 93 | Tandy Chess Champion 2150 | cb-emu | 1577 | 346 | ±16 |
| 94 | Saitek Turbo 16K | cb-emu | 1437 | 348 | ±11 |
| 95 | Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) | cb-emu | 1285 | 347 | ±8 |
✱ = débrief cliquable · moteurs en italique = figés (machines dédiées)
Débriefs · adversaire par adversaire
Débrief de chaque gauntlet
Perf locale = cote Ordo de l'adversaire + 400·log₁₀(p/(1−p)). Sa dispersion reflète la transitivité du moteur.
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3690 · 140 parties · 57.9 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo3690± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3681 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +1/=19/−0 | 3690 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3672 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +1/=19/−0 | 3678 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 13/20 | 65.0 % | +7/=12/−1 | 3744 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +5/=15/−0 | 3646 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +9/=11/−0 | 3719 |
Meilleur : 72 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti.
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 3681 · 140 parties · 56.4 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo3681± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3690 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3673 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3672 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +2/=18/−0 | 3695 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +5/=15/−0 | 3725 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3628 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +7/=13/−0 | 3678 |
Meilleur : 68 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3673 · 175 parties · 57.1 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo3673± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +0/=19/−1 | 3673 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3681 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3672 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +1/=19/−0 | 3678 |
| Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3655 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +1/=19/−0 | 3673 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 15 | 9/15 | 60.0 % | +3/=12/−0 | 3707 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 15 | 10.5/15 | 70.0 % | +6/=9/−0 | 3704 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +4/=11/−0 | 3646 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 15 | 9/15 | 60.0 % | +3/=12/−0 | 3585 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 15 | 11.5/15 | 76.7 % | +8/=7/−0 | 3701 |
Meilleur : 77 % vs Caissa 1.5 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3672 · 120 parties · 55.0 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo3672± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3690 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3681 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +0/=20/−0 | 3673 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +1/=18/−1 | 3660 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3628 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 20 | 14/20 | 70.0 % | +8/=12/−0 | 3698 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3660 · 200 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3660± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +0/=19/−1 | 3673 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +0/=18/−2 | 3646 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +0/=19/−1 | 3656 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +1/=18/−1 | 3672 |
| Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3655 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +0/=18/−2 | 3621 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +3/=16/−1 | 3671 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +3/=17/−0 | 3610 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +6/=13/−1 | 3619 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +12/=8/−0 | 3755 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 15.5/20 | 77.5 % | +11/=9/−0 | 3709 |
Meilleur : 80 % vs Ethereal 12.75 8CPU · plus dur : 45 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti.
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 3655 · 100 parties · 55.5 % · err ±20
Cote Ordo3655± 20
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +0/=19/−1 | 3656 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +2/=18/−0 | 3695 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +3/=17/−0 | 3689 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +2/=18/−0 | 3592 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +5/=15/−0 | 3639 |
Meilleur : 62 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3636 · 274 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12
Cote Ordo3636± 12
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 7/20 | 35.0 % | +1/=12/−7 | 3583 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +0/=15/−5 | 3592 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 15 | 6/15 | 40.0 % | +0/=12/−3 | 3603 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +1/=16/−3 | 3626 |
| Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3655 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +0/=17/−3 | 3603 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 13/20 | 65.0 % | +6/=14/−0 | 3665 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 19 | 13/19 | 68.4 % | +7/=12/−0 | 3664 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 13/20 | 65.0 % | +6/=14/−0 | 3622 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 14/20 | 70.0 % | +8/=12/−0 | 3601 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +12/=8/−0 | 3689 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +12/=8/−0 | 3655 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 18/20 | 90.0 % | +16/=4/−0 | 3776 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +12/=8/−0 | 3619 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 18/20 | 90.0 % | +16/=4/−0 | 3719 |
Meilleur : 90 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3557 · 355 parties · 53.1 % · err ±11
Cote Ordo3557± 11
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +0/=15/−5 | 3601 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3611 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 15 | 4.5/15 | 30.0 % | +0/=9/−6 | 3526 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3601 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +0/=17/−3 | 3608 |
| Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3655 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +0/=18/−2 | 3621 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 7/20 | 35.0 % | +0/=14/−6 | 3529 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 12 | 5.5/12 | 45.8 % | +1/=9/−2 | 3522 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 13/20 | 65.0 % | +6/=14/−0 | 3638 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 12 | 7/12 | 58.3 % | +2/=10/−0 | 3574 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +1/=16/−3 | 3480 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 12 | 6/12 | 50.0 % | +0/=12/−0 | 3494 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 12 | 6/12 | 50.0 % | +1/=10/−1 | 3476 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +6/=13/−1 | 3543 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 32 | 20/32 | 62.5 % | +9/=22/−1 | 3537 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +7/=13/−0 | 3541 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 14/20 | 70.0 % | +8/=12/−0 | 3541 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 14/20 | 70.0 % | +8/=12/−0 | 3525 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 15.5/20 | 77.5 % | +12/=7/−1 | 3552 |
Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3551 · 190 parties · 46.3 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3551± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads | 3690 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +0/=11/−9 | 3522 |
| Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3681 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +0/=13/−7 | 3554 |
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +0/=11/−4 | 3578 |
| Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads | 3672 | 20 | 6/20 | 30.0 % | +0/=12/−8 | 3525 |
| Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread | 3655 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +0/=15/−5 | 3567 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 12 | 6.5/12 | 54.2 % | +2/=9/−1 | 3586 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 13 | 7/13 | 53.8 % | +1/=12/−0 | 3542 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 15 | 8/15 | 53.3 % | +2/=12/−1 | 3518 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +4/=11/−0 | 3571 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 15 | 10/15 | 66.7 % | +6/=8/−1 | 3574 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +5/=9/−1 | 3543 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 6.5/10 | 65.0 % | +3/=7/−0 | 3551 |
Meilleur : 67 % vs Ethereal 11.75 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3530 · 198 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3530± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +1/=13/−6 | 3572 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 19 | 6/19 | 31.6 % | +0/=12/−7 | 3502 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 7/20 | 35.0 % | +0/=14/−6 | 3450 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +3/=15/−2 | 3532 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +3/=17/−0 | 3507 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +8/=11/−1 | 3575 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 19 | 13.5/19 | 71.1 % | +8/=11/−0 | 3570 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 13/20 | 65.0 % | +7/=12/−1 | 3502 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +8/=11/−1 | 3505 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 16.5/20 | 82.5 % | +13/=7/−0 | 3607 |
Meilleur : 82 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3516 · 97 parties · 54.1 % · err ±20
Cote Ordo3516± 20
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 12 | 5/12 | 41.7 % | +0/=10/−2 | 3499 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 13 | 6/13 | 46.2 % | +0/=12/−1 | 3524 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 13 | 7/13 | 53.8 % | +2/=10/−1 | 3521 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 13 | 8.5/13 | 65.4 % | +4/=9/−0 | 3586 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 12 | 8/12 | 66.7 % | +4/=8/−0 | 3579 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 12 | 5.5/12 | 45.8 % | +0/=11/−1 | 3425 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 12 | 6.5/12 | 54.2 % | +2/=9/−1 | 3477 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +2/=8/−0 | 3514 |
Meilleur : 67 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 42 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit 8CPU.
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3515 · 215 parties · 52.8 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3515± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 15 | 6/15 | 40.0 % | +0/=12/−3 | 3603 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +0/=8/−12 | 3420 |
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 7/20 | 35.0 % | +0/=14/−6 | 3529 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +3/=16/−1 | 3592 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +2/=15/−3 | 3513 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +3/=17/−0 | 3507 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3519 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +2/=18/−0 | 3449 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3464 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 14/20 | 70.0 % | +9/=10/−1 | 3525 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 15.5/20 | 77.5 % | +11/=9/−0 | 3552 |
Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3494 · 185 parties · 48.4 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo3494± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 20 — 8 Threads | 3673 | 15 | 3.5/15 | 23.3 % | +0/=7/−8 | 3466 |
| Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads | 3660 | 20 | 4.5/20 | 22.5 % | +0/=9/−11 | 3446 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 12 | 6/12 | 50.0 % | +0/=12/−0 | 3557 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 15 | 7/15 | 46.7 % | +1/=12/−2 | 3527 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 13 | 6/13 | 46.2 % | +1/=10/−2 | 3489 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +4/=15/−1 | 3528 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +2/=17/−1 | 3476 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +2/=17/−1 | 3471 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +3/=17/−0 | 3501 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +2/=8/−0 | 3514 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +5/=15/−0 | 3483 |
Meilleur : 62 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 22 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3476 · 110 parties · 47.7 % · err ±19
Cote Ordo3476± 19
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 12 | 6/12 | 50.0 % | +1/=10/−1 | 3557 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +0/=11/−4 | 3456 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 13 | 4.5/13 | 34.6 % | +0/=9/−4 | 3405 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +1/=15/−4 | 3442 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +4/=15/−1 | 3511 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +3/=16/−1 | 3489 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +2/=7/−1 | 3479 |
Meilleur : 57 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit 8CPU.
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3458 · 153 parties · 54.6 % · err ±16
Cote Ordo3458± 16
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 12 | 4/12 | 33.3 % | +0/=8/−4 | 3395 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +1/=17/−2 | 3477 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +1/=15/−4 | 3423 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +4/=8/−1 | 3535 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 18 | 8.5/18 | 47.2 % | +1/=15/−2 | 3429 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +1/=7/−2 | 3409 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +3/=14/−3 | 3394 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +12/=8/−0 | 3580 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +9/=11/−0 | 3484 |
Meilleur : 80 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit 8CPU.
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3454 · 180 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo3454± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 6/20 | 30.0 % | +0/=12/−8 | 3489 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +1/=13/−6 | 3468 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +0/=17/−3 | 3478 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +0/=17/−3 | 3462 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +0/=19/−1 | 3431 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +5/=14/−1 | 3485 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3464 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +5/=11/−4 | 3395 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +5/=15/−0 | 3426 |
Meilleur : 62 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3454 · 144 parties · 50.7 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo3454± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 15 | 5/15 | 33.3 % | +1/=8/−6 | 3430 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 12 | 6.5/12 | 54.2 % | +1/=11/−0 | 3545 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +1/=17/−2 | 3477 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +1/=16/−3 | 3441 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +1/=8/−4 | 3377 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +1/=12/−1 | 3448 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +3/=6/−1 | 3514 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 14 | 8/14 | 57.1 % | +3/=10/−1 | 3444 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 13 | 9/13 | 69.2 % | +5/=8/−0 | 3480 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +3/=10/−0 | 3397 |
Meilleur : 69 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3448 · 338 parties · 49.0 % · err ±11
Cote Ordo3448± 11
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +0/=8/−12 | 3396 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 32 | 12/32 | 37.5 % | +1/=22/−9 | 3468 |
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +1/=9/−5 | 3456 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +1/=11/−8 | 3403 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 12 | 5.5/12 | 45.8 % | +1/=9/−2 | 3487 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3444 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +0/=17/−3 | 3442 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 18 | 9.5/18 | 52.8 % | +2/=15/−1 | 3478 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +1/=19/−0 | 3472 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +1/=12/−1 | 3454 |
| Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads | 3444 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +1/=7/−2 | 3409 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +2/=15/−3 | 3397 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 39 | 22.5/39 | 57.7 % | +7/=31/−1 | 3448 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3448 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 19 | 14/19 | 73.7 % | +11/=6/−2 | 3518 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 12.5/20 | 62.5 % | +6/=13/−1 | 3426 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 19 | 13.5/19 | 71.1 % | +9/=9/−1 | 3471 |
Meilleur : 74 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3444 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24
Cote Ordo3444± 24
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads | 3551 | 10 | 3.5/10 | 35.0 % | +0/=7/−3 | 3443 |
| Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3516 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +0/=8/−2 | 3445 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +0/=8/−2 | 3424 |
| Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads | 3476 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +1/=7/−2 | 3441 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +2/=7/−1 | 3493 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +1/=6/−3 | 3383 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +2/=7/−1 | 3483 |
Meilleur : 55 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3414 · 179 parties · 42.5 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo3414± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +0/=8/−12 | 3396 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +0/=13/−7 | 3430 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 19 | 5.5/19 | 28.9 % | +0/=11/−8 | 3374 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +0/=18/−2 | 3480 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +1/=14/−5 | 3384 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 10.5/20 | 52.5 % | +3/=15/−2 | 3466 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +3/=14/−3 | 3394 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +5/=12/−3 | 3413 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +5/=13/−2 | 3390 |
Meilleur : 57 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3394 · 397 parties · 51.8 % · err ±10
Cote Ordo3394± 10
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 2/20 | 10.0 % | +0/=4/−16 | 3255 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 6/20 | 30.0 % | +0/=12/−8 | 3410 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 7/20 | 35.0 % | +1/=12/−7 | 3423 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3444 |
| Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads | 3494 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +0/=15/−5 | 3406 |
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +3/=14/−3 | 3458 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3384 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 14 | 6/14 | 42.9 % | +1/=10/−3 | 3404 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 39 | 16.5/39 | 42.3 % | +1/=31/−7 | 3394 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +3/=14/−3 | 3414 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +4/=16/−0 | 3448 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 25 | 13.5/25 | 54.0 % | +5/=17/−3 | 3367 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +3/=16/−1 | 3372 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 20 | 12/20 | 60.0 % | +6/=12/−2 | 3386 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +9/=9/−2 | 3386 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +7/=13/−0 | 3382 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 20 | 16.5/20 | 82.5 % | +13/=7/−0 | 3455 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 19 | 14.5/19 | 76.3 % | +10/=9/−0 | 3371 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 20 | 18/20 | 90.0 % | +16/=4/−0 | 3536 |
Meilleur : 90 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3378 · 180 parties · 37.2 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3378± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +0/=8/−12 | 3396 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 6/20 | 30.0 % | +0/=12/−8 | 3410 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +1/=11/−8 | 3403 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 6/20 | 30.0 % | +1/=10/−9 | 3367 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 9.5/20 | 47.5 % | +4/=11/−5 | 3437 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3378 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +3/=12/−5 | 3379 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +0/=16/−4 | 3324 |
| Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads | 3338 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +2/=16/−2 | 3338 |
Meilleur : 50 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3339 · 154 parties · 47.7 % · err ±16
Cote Ordo3339± 16
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +0/=8/−12 | 3217 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 13 | 4/13 | 30.8 % | +0/=8/−5 | 3313 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 19 | 5/19 | 26.3 % | +2/=6/−11 | 3269 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 25 | 11.5/25 | 46.0 % | +3/=17/−5 | 3366 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 26 | 13.5/26 | 51.9 % | +5/=17/−4 | 3329 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 26 | 18/26 | 69.2 % | +11/=14/−1 | 3400 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 25 | 17.5/25 | 70.0 % | +11/=13/−1 | 3403 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 3.75 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3338 · 180 parties · 31.7 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo3338± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads | 3636 | 20 | 2/20 | 10.0 % | +0/=4/−16 | 3255 |
| Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3557 | 20 | 4.5/20 | 22.5 % | +1/=7/−12 | 3342 |
| Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads | 3530 | 20 | 3.5/20 | 17.5 % | +0/=7/−13 | 3261 |
| Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads | 3515 | 20 | 4.5/20 | 22.5 % | +0/=9/−11 | 3300 |
| Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +0/=15/−5 | 3366 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 20 | 7.5/20 | 37.5 % | +1/=13/−6 | 3360 |
| rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads | 3414 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +2/=13/−5 | 3362 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +1/=16/−3 | 3359 |
| Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads | 3378 | 20 | 10/20 | 50.0 % | +2/=16/−2 | 3378 |
Meilleur : 50 % vs Laser 1.7 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3315 · 158 parties · 46.5 % · err ±16
Cote Ordo3315± 16
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads | 3458 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +0/=11/−9 | 3290 |
| Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads | 3454 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +0/=10/−3 | 3372 |
| Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads | 3448 | 19 | 5.5/19 | 28.9 % | +1/=9/−9 | 3292 |
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 8/20 | 40.0 % | +2/=12/−6 | 3324 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 26 | 12.5/26 | 48.1 % | +4/=17/−5 | 3326 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +5/=13/−2 | 3312 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +6/=10/−4 | 3290 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +10/=9/−1 | 3336 |
Meilleur : 72 % vs Naum 4.2 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3259 · 143 parties · 51.4 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo3259± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +2/=9/−9 | 3267 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 26 | 8/26 | 30.8 % | +1/=14/−11 | 3198 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +2/=13/−5 | 3263 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 13 | 5.5/13 | 42.3 % | +1/=9/−3 | 3202 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 12 | 7/12 | 58.3 % | +4/=6/−2 | 3244 |
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 13 | 10/13 | 76.9 % | +7/=6/−0 | 3380 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +4/=8/−1 | 3249 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 13 | 9/13 | 69.2 % | +6/=6/−1 | 3295 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 13 | 11/13 | 84.6 % | +9/=4/−0 | 3334 |
Meilleur : 85 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 31 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3256 · 161 parties · 50.9 % · err ±16
Cote Ordo3256± 16
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +0/=13/−7 | 3267 |
| Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads | 3339 | 25 | 7.5/25 | 30.0 % | +1/=13/−11 | 3192 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +4/=10/−6 | 3280 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 13 | 7.5/13 | 57.7 % | +3/=9/−1 | 3313 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 9 | 5.5/9 | 61.1 % | +2/=7/−0 | 3264 |
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 29 | 17/29 | 58.6 % | +7/=20/−2 | 3231 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 30 | 18.5/30 | 61.7 % | +10/=17/−3 | 3250 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 15 | 10.5/15 | 70.0 % | +6/=9/−0 | 3301 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 30 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3185 · 81 parties · 44.4 % · err ±22
Cote Ordo3185± 22
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 3.5/20 | 17.5 % | +0/=7/−13 | 3125 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 12 | 5/12 | 41.7 % | +2/=6/−4 | 3201 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 9 | 3.5/9 | 38.9 % | +0/=7/−2 | 3177 |
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +3/=6/−1 | 3241 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 3167 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +5/=2/−3 | 3225 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 10 | 7/10 | 70.0 % | +5/=4/−1 | 3185 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 18 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3171 · 128 parties · 57.4 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo3171± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 13 | 3/13 | 23.1 % | +0/=6/−7 | 3050 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 29 | 12/29 | 41.4 % | +2/=20/−7 | 3195 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +1/=6/−3 | 3115 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 16 | 8/16 | 50.0 % | +2/=12/−2 | 3154 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 15 | 11.5/15 | 76.7 % | +9/=5/−1 | 3245 |
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 15 | 12.5/15 | 83.3 % | +10/=5/−0 | 3280 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 15 | 11.5/15 | 76.7 % | +8/=7/−0 | 3197 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 15 | 11/15 | 73.3 % | +8/=6/−1 | 3091 |
Meilleur : 83 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 · plus dur : 23 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3167 · 108 parties · 36.6 % · err ±19
Cote Ordo3167± 19
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 19 | 4.5/19 | 23.7 % | +0/=9/−10 | 3191 |
| Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads | 3315 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +1/=9/−10 | 3147 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +1/=8/−4 | 3178 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 30 | 11.5/30 | 38.3 % | +3/=17/−10 | 3173 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 3185 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 16 | 8/16 | 50.0 % | +3/=10/−3 | 3154 |
Meilleur : 50 % vs Senpai 2.0 8CPU · plus dur : 24 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 3154 · 122 parties · 45.9 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo3154± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads | 3394 | 20 | 2/20 | 10.0 % | +0/=4/−16 | 3012 |
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 13 | 4/13 | 30.8 % | +1/=6/−6 | 3119 |
| Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads | 3256 | 15 | 4.5/15 | 30.0 % | +0/=9/−6 | 3108 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +3/=2/−5 | 3115 |
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 16 | 8/16 | 50.0 % | +2/=12/−2 | 3171 |
| Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads | 3167 | 16 | 8/16 | 50.0 % | +3/=10/−3 | 3167 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 16 | 13/16 | 81.2 % | +11/=4/−1 | 3293 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 16 | 12.5/16 | 78.1 % | +11/=3/−2 | 3211 |
Meilleur : 81 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 3038 · 121 parties · 47.9 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo3038± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads | 3259 | 13 | 2/13 | 15.4 % | +0/=4/−9 | 2963 |
| Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads | 3185 | 10 | 3/10 | 30.0 % | +1/=4/−5 | 3038 |
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 15 | 3.5/15 | 23.3 % | +1/=5/−9 | 2964 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 16 | 3/16 | 18.8 % | +1/=4/−11 | 2899 |
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 16 | 9/16 | 56.2 % | +4/=10/−2 | 3044 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 17 | 10.5/17 | 61.8 % | +6/=9/−2 | 3073 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 17 | 13.5/17 | 79.4 % | +11/=5/−1 | 3149 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 17 | 13.5/17 | 79.4 % | +10/=7/−0 | 3117 |
Meilleur : 79 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 · plus dur : 15 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 3001 · 102 parties · 55.9 % · err ±20
Cote Ordo3001± 20
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 15 | 2.5/15 | 16.7 % | +0/=5/−10 | 2891 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 16 | 7/16 | 43.8 % | +2/=10/−4 | 2995 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 15 | 8/15 | 53.3 % | +5/=6/−4 | 3013 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +5/=9/−1 | 3010 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 16 | 10/16 | 62.5 % | +6/=8/−2 | 2971 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 19 | 14.5/19 | 76.3 % | +11/=7/−1 | 3052 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 3 | 2.5/3 | 83.3 % | +2/=1/−0 | 3036 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 3 | 3/3 | 100.0 % | +3/=0/−0 | 3527 |
Meilleur : 76 % vs Shredder 10 UCI · plus dur : 17 % vs Wasp 2.00 8CPU.
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 2990 · 142 parties · 52.1 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo2990± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 15 | 3.5/15 | 23.3 % | +0/=7/−8 | 2964 |
| Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread | 3154 | 16 | 3.5/16 | 21.9 % | +2/=3/−11 | 2933 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 17 | 6.5/17 | 38.2 % | +2/=9/−6 | 2955 |
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 15 | 7/15 | 46.7 % | +4/=6/−5 | 2978 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 19 | 9.5/19 | 50.0 % | +4/=11/−4 | 2915 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +11/=7/−2 | 3051 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 20 | 13.5/20 | 67.5 % | +9/=9/−2 | 2976 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 20 | 16/20 | 80.0 % | +14/=4/−2 | 2997 |
Meilleur : 80 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 22 % vs Komodo64 3.
Loop M1-T — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 2915 · 120 parties · 45.8 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo2915± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads | 3171 | 15 | 4/15 | 26.7 % | +1/=6/−8 | 2995 |
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 17 | 3.5/17 | 20.6 % | +1/=5/−11 | 2804 |
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +1/=9/−5 | 2906 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 19 | 9.5/19 | 50.0 % | +4/=11/−4 | 2990 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 17 | 9/17 | 52.9 % | +5/=8/−4 | 2903 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 19 | 11/19 | 57.9 % | +7/=8/−4 | 2904 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 18 | 12.5/18 | 69.4 % | +8/=9/−1 | 2899 |
Meilleur : 69 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2882 · 150 parties · 50.7 % · err ±16
Cote Ordo2882± 16
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads | 3038 | 17 | 3.5/17 | 20.6 % | +0/=7/−10 | 2804 |
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 16 | 6/16 | 37.5 % | +2/=8/−6 | 2912 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +2/=7/−11 | 2822 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 17 | 8/17 | 47.1 % | +4/=8/−5 | 2894 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 27 | 17/27 | 63.0 % | +13/=8/−6 | 2941 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 6 | 4.5/6 | 75.0 % | +4/=1/−1 | 2973 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 27 | 17/27 | 63.0 % | +12/=10/−5 | 2849 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +10/=9/−1 | 2896 |
Meilleur : 72 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2849 · 229 parties · 56.1 % · err ±13
Cote Ordo2849± 13
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 19 | 4.5/19 | 23.7 % | +1/=7/−11 | 2798 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 20 | 6.5/20 | 32.5 % | +2/=9/−9 | 2863 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 19 | 8/19 | 42.1 % | +4/=8/−7 | 2860 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 27 | 10/27 | 37.0 % | +6/=8/−13 | 2790 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 34 | 21/34 | 61.8 % | +12/=18/−4 | 2840 |
| Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | 2730 | 14 | 10/14 | 71.4 % | +9/=2/−3 | 2889 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 20 | 15/20 | 75.0 % | +13/=4/−3 | 2918 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 6.5/10 | 65.0 % | +4/=5/−1 | 2828 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 35 | 24.5/35 | 70.0 % | +19/=11/−5 | 2866 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +4/=4/−2 | 2753 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 21 | 16.5/21 | 78.6 % | +13/=7/−1 | 2896 |
Meilleur : 79 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 24 % vs Gull 1.2 x64.
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2797 · 60 parties · 56.7 % · err ±26
Cote Ordo2797± 26
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 15 | 5/15 | 33.3 % | +3/=4/−8 | 2661 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 15 | 10/15 | 66.7 % | +7/=6/−2 | 2877 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +6/=7/−2 | 2836 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +7/=5/−3 | 2814 |
Meilleur : 67 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 33 % vs Deep Junior 7.
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2787 · 90 parties · 62.8 % · err ±20
Cote Ordo2787± 20
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 15 | 8/15 | 53.3 % | +4/=8/−3 | 2775 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 15 | 7/15 | 46.7 % | +4/=6/−5 | 2718 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 10/15 | 66.7 % | +6/=8/−1 | 2839 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 15 | 10.5/15 | 70.0 % | +9/=3/−3 | 2817 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 15 | 9/15 | 60.0 % | +7/=4/−4 | 2736 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 15 | 12/15 | 80.0 % | +9/=6/−0 | 2852 |
Meilleur : 80 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 47 % vs Junior 8.
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2782 · 169 parties · 58.6 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo2782± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 6 | 1.5/6 | 25.0 % | +1/=1/−4 | 2692 |
| Shredder 6 — 1 Thread | 2797 | 15 | 10/15 | 66.7 % | +8/=4/−3 | 2917 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 14 | 7.5/14 | 53.6 % | +6/=3/−5 | 2781 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +5/=4/−5 | 2741 |
| Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | 2730 | 14 | 6.5/14 | 46.4 % | +5/=3/−6 | 2705 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 5/9 | 55.6 % | +4/=2/−3 | 2766 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +5/=2/−3 | 2791 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +9/=1/−5 | 2814 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +4/=6/−4 | 2699 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 2683 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 20 | 14.5/20 | 72.5 % | +11/=7/−2 | 2838 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 14 | 9/14 | 64.3 % | +7/=4/−3 | 2768 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 14 | 10.5/14 | 75.0 % | +9/=3/−2 | 2846 |
Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 46 % vs Deep Fritz.
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2771 · 90 parties · 60.6 % · err ±21
Cote Ordo2771± 21
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 12 | 7/12 | 58.3 % | +5/=4/−3 | 2810 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 13 | 7/13 | 53.8 % | +4/=6/−3 | 2768 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +4/=8/−1 | 2800 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 13 | 8.5/13 | 65.4 % | +7/=3/−3 | 2810 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 13 | 10/13 | 76.9 % | +9/=2/−2 | 2879 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +7/=2/−4 | 2748 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 13 | 6/13 | 46.2 % | +3/=6/−4 | 2584 |
Meilleur : 77 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 46 % vs Nimzo 8.
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2756 · 219 parties · 44.1 % · err ±13
Cote Ordo2756± 13
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 3 | 0.5/3 | 16.7 % | +0/=1/−2 | 2721 |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads | 2990 | 20 | 4/20 | 20.0 % | +2/=4/−14 | 2749 |
| Loop M1-T — 8 Threads | 2915 | 18 | 5.5/18 | 30.6 % | +1/=9/−8 | 2772 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 27 | 10/27 | 37.0 % | +5/=10/−12 | 2790 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 34 | 13/34 | 38.2 % | +4/=18/−12 | 2765 |
| Shredder 6 — 1 Thread | 2797 | 15 | 5/15 | 33.3 % | +2/=6/−7 | 2677 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 6.5/14 | 46.4 % | +5/=3/−6 | 2757 |
| Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | 2730 | 14 | 8/14 | 57.1 % | +7/=2/−5 | 2780 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +5/=1/−4 | 2755 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 10/15 | 66.7 % | +8/=4/−3 | 2839 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +5/=1/−4 | 2718 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 13 | 7.5/13 | 57.7 % | +6/=3/−4 | 2724 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 13 | 7.5/13 | 57.7 % | +6/=3/−4 | 2720 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +7/=2/−4 | 2737 |
Meilleur : 67 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 · plus dur : 20 % vs Glaurung 2.2 JA 8CPU.
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2752 · 103 parties · 56.8 % · err ±20
Cote Ordo2752± 20
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 7/15 | 46.7 % | +3/=8/−4 | 2764 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 12 | 5/12 | 41.7 % | +3/=4/−5 | 2712 |
| Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | 2730 | 14 | 6.5/14 | 46.4 % | +3/=7/−4 | 2705 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 12 | 7.5/12 | 62.5 % | +6/=3/−3 | 2788 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 13 | 8/13 | 61.5 % | +5/=6/−2 | 2752 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 12 | 8/12 | 66.7 % | +6/=4/−2 | 2786 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 13 | 9.5/13 | 73.1 % | +7/=5/−1 | 2829 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 12 | 7/12 | 58.3 % | +5/=4/−3 | 2670 |
Meilleur : 73 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 42 % vs Fritz 7.
Junior 8 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2741 · 138 parties · 55.1 % · err ±17
Cote Ordo2741± 17
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 6 — 1 Thread | 2797 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +2/=7/−6 | 2702 |
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 8/15 | 53.3 % | +5/=6/−4 | 2811 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +5/=4/−5 | 2782 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 6/13 | 46.2 % | +3/=6/−4 | 2744 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 9 | 5.5/9 | 61.1 % | +4/=3/−2 | 2799 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 9 | 4.5/9 | 50.0 % | +4/=1/−4 | 2670 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 8 | 7/8 | 87.5 % | +6/=2/−0 | 3004 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 28 | 15/28 | 53.6 % | +10/=10/−8 | 2680 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 9 | 6/9 | 66.7 % | +5/=2/−2 | 2732 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 9 | 6/9 | 66.7 % | +5/=2/−2 | 2719 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 9 | 5.5/9 | 61.1 % | +4/=3/−2 | 2667 |
Meilleur : 54 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Shredder 6.
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2730 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24
Cote Ordo2730± 24
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 14 | 4/14 | 28.6 % | +3/=2/−9 | 2690 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 7.5/14 | 53.6 % | +6/=3/−5 | 2807 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 14 | 6/14 | 42.9 % | +5/=2/−7 | 2706 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 14 | 7.5/14 | 53.6 % | +4/=7/−3 | 2777 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 14 | 6/14 | 42.9 % | +3/=6/−5 | 2669 |
Meilleur : 54 % vs Deep Junior 7 · plus dur : 29 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads
Cote Ordo 2727 · 118 parties · 50.0 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo2727± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread | 3001 | 3 | 0/3 | 0.0 % | +0/=0/−3 | 2201 |
| Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread | 2882 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +1/=9/−10 | 2714 |
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 20 | 5/20 | 25.0 % | +3/=4/−13 | 2658 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 9 | 4/9 | 44.4 % | +3/=2/−4 | 2743 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 9 | 4/9 | 44.4 % | +3/=2/−4 | 2661 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 1 | 0/1 | 0.0 % | +0/=0/−1 | 1870 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 9 | 5.5/9 | 61.1 % | +4/=3/−2 | 2745 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 9 | 6/9 | 66.7 % | +4/=4/−1 | 2776 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 9 | 7/9 | 77.8 % | +6/=2/−1 | 2829 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 9 | 7/9 | 77.8 % | +7/=0/−2 | 2816 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 10 | 8.5/10 | 85.0 % | +8/=1/−1 | 2890 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 10 | 6.5/10 | 65.0 % | +6/=1/−3 | 2677 |
Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2720 · 121 parties · 51.2 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo2720± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 10 | 3.5/10 | 35.0 % | +1/=5/−4 | 2741 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +3/=2/−5 | 2711 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +4/=1/−5 | 2722 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 9 | 3.5/9 | 38.9 % | +2/=3/−4 | 2662 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 6.5/15 | 43.3 % | +4/=5/−6 | 2672 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 8 | 4/8 | 50.0 % | +2/=4/−2 | 2699 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +4/=4/−2 | 2753 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +3/=6/−1 | 2740 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 2666 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 29 | 19/29 | 65.5 % | +15/=8/−6 | 2767 |
Meilleur : 66 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 35 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2719 · 186 parties · 45.2 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo2719± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 35 | 10.5/35 | 30.0 % | +5/=11/−19 | 2702 |
| Shredder 6 — 1 Thread | 2797 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +3/=5/−7 | 2702 |
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 5/15 | 33.3 % | +1/=8/−6 | 2667 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +5/=1/−9 | 2687 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +1/=8/−4 | 2689 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 15 | 5/15 | 33.3 % | +3/=4/−8 | 2636 |
| Deep Fritz — 1 Thread | 2730 | 14 | 8/14 | 57.1 % | +5/=6/−3 | 2780 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 15 | 8.5/15 | 56.7 % | +6/=5/−4 | 2767 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 15 | 9.5/15 | 63.3 % | +7/=5/−3 | 2778 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 34 | 21.5/34 | 63.2 % | +14/=15/−5 | 2749 |
Meilleur : 63 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 30 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.
Junior 7 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2699 · 189 parties · 56.1 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo2699± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +4/=6/−4 | 2782 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 4.5/13 | 34.6 % | +3/=3/−7 | 2660 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 12 | 4.5/12 | 37.5 % | +3/=3/−6 | 2663 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 5/9 | 55.6 % | +4/=2/−3 | 2766 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 8 | 4/8 | 50.0 % | +2/=4/−2 | 2720 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 9 | 6/9 | 66.7 % | +6/=0/−3 | 2790 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 19 | 10.5/19 | 55.3 % | +7/=7/−5 | 2703 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 9 | 4/9 | 44.4 % | +3/=2/−4 | 2616 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 24 | 14/24 | 58.3 % | +13/=2/−9 | 2670 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 23 | 14/23 | 60.9 % | +10/=8/−5 | 2676 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 29 | 21.5/29 | 74.1 % | +19/=5/−5 | 2772 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 20 | 11/20 | 55.0 % | +10/=2/−8 | 2604 |
Meilleur : 74 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 35 % vs Fritz 7.
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2683 · 85 parties · 44.1 % · err ±22
Cote Ordo2683± 22
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +2/=4/−4 | 2778 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 2782 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +4/=1/−5 | 2722 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +2/=4/−4 | 2650 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 15 | 5.5/15 | 36.7 % | +3/=5/−7 | 2624 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +2/=4/−4 | 2599 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +3/=3/−4 | 2631 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +5/=2/−3 | 2726 |
Meilleur : 60 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0.
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2670 · 193 parties · 41.5 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo2670± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread | 2849 | 21 | 4.5/21 | 21.4 % | +1/=7/−13 | 2623 |
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 4.5/15 | 30.0 % | +3/=3/−9 | 2640 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 20 | 5.5/20 | 27.5 % | +2/=7/−11 | 2613 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 3/13 | 23.1 % | +2/=2/−9 | 2561 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 13 | 5.5/13 | 42.3 % | +4/=3/−6 | 2703 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +2/=6/−5 | 2670 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 9 | 4.5/9 | 50.0 % | +4/=1/−4 | 2741 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 1 | 1/1 | 100.0 % | +1/=0/−0 | 3527 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +1/=6/−3 | 2650 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 9 | 3/9 | 33.3 % | +3/=0/−6 | 2579 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 6/10 | 60.0 % | +4/=4/−2 | 2753 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 20 | 11.5/20 | 57.5 % | +8/=7/−5 | 2719 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 39 | 22/39 | 56.4 % | +12/=20/−7 | 2700 |
Meilleur : 60 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 21 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.
List 512 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2666 · 212 parties · 45.0 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo2666± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 6/15 | 40.0 % | +4/=4/−7 | 2717 |
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 5/14 | 35.7 % | +3/=4/−7 | 2680 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +4/=2/−7 | 2689 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 13 | 5.5/13 | 42.3 % | +4/=3/−6 | 2703 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 12 | 4/12 | 33.3 % | +2/=4/−6 | 2631 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 8 | 1/8 | 12.5 % | +0/=2/−6 | 2403 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 3.5/9 | 38.9 % | +2/=3/−4 | 2649 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 10 | 5/10 | 50.0 % | +3/=4/−3 | 2720 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 19 | 8.5/19 | 44.7 % | +5/=7/−7 | 2663 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +4/=3/−3 | 2718 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 20 | 8.5/20 | 42.5 % | +5/=7/−8 | 2617 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 29 | 12.5/29 | 43.1 % | +7/=11/−11 | 2607 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 10 | 7/10 | 70.0 % | +6/=2/−2 | 2758 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 10 | 6.5/10 | 65.0 % | +5/=3/−2 | 2706 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 10 | 6.5/10 | 65.0 % | +4/=5/−1 | 2696 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 10 | 5.5/10 | 55.0 % | +3/=5/−2 | 2604 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 33 % vs Hiarcs 8.
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2655 · 368 parties · 48.4 % · err ±10
Cote Ordo2655± 10
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2782 | 14 | 3.5/14 | 25.0 % | +2/=3/−9 | 2591 |
| ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2756 | 13 | 5/13 | 38.5 % | +4/=2/−7 | 2675 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 13 | 3.5/13 | 26.9 % | +1/=5/−7 | 2578 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 28 | 13/28 | 46.4 % | +8/=10/−10 | 2716 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 3/9 | 33.3 % | +1/=4/−4 | 2607 |
| Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread | 2720 | 29 | 10/29 | 34.5 % | +6/=8/−15 | 2609 |
| Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread | 2719 | 34 | 12.5/34 | 36.8 % | +5/=15/−14 | 2624 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 9 | 5/9 | 55.6 % | +4/=2/−3 | 2738 |
| Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread | 2683 | 10 | 4/10 | 40.0 % | +3/=2/−5 | 2612 |
| SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread | 2670 | 39 | 17/39 | 43.6 % | +7/=20/−12 | 2625 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 29 | 16.5/29 | 56.9 % | +11/=11/−7 | 2714 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 34 | 22.5/34 | 66.2 % | +15/=15/−4 | 2728 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 33 | 18/33 | 54.5 % | +13/=10/−10 | 2630 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 53 | 30.5/53 | 57.5 % | +17/=27/−9 | 2641 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 21 | 14/21 | 66.7 % | +12/=4/−5 | 2690 |
Meilleur : 67 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 25 % vs Deep Junior 7.
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2611 · 171 parties · 40.6 % · err ±15
Cote Ordo2611± 15
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 8 — 1 Thread | 2787 | 15 | 3/15 | 20.0 % | +0/=6/−9 | 2547 |
| Fritz 7 — 1 Thread | 2771 | 13 | 7/13 | 53.8 % | +4/=6/−3 | 2797 |
| Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread | 2752 | 12 | 5/12 | 41.7 % | +3/=4/−5 | 2693 |
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 9 | 3/9 | 33.3 % | +2/=2/−5 | 2620 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 2/9 | 22.2 % | +1/=2/−6 | 2510 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 24 | 10/24 | 41.7 % | +9/=2/−13 | 2641 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 3/10 | 30.0 % | +2/=2/−6 | 2519 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 34 | 11.5/34 | 33.8 % | +4/=15/−15 | 2539 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 15 | 8.5/15 | 56.7 % | +6/=5/−4 | 2645 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 15 | 6/15 | 40.0 % | +3/=6/−6 | 2518 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 15 | 10.5/15 | 70.0 % | +9/=3/−3 | 2716 |
Meilleur : 70 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 20 % vs Fritz 8.
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2599 · 126 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18
Cote Ordo2599± 18
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 9 | 3/9 | 33.3 % | +2/=2/−5 | 2620 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 9 | 2/9 | 22.2 % | +2/=0/−7 | 2510 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 23 | 9/23 | 39.1 % | +5/=8/−10 | 2623 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 3.5/10 | 35.0 % | +2/=3/−5 | 2558 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 33 | 15/33 | 45.5 % | +10/=10/−13 | 2624 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 15 | 6.5/15 | 43.3 % | +4/=5/−6 | 2564 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +4/=6/−4 | 2589 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 13 | 7.5/13 | 57.7 % | +4/=7/−2 | 2623 |
Meilleur : 58 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 35 % vs List 512.
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2589 · 195 parties · 46.2 % · err ±14
Cote Ordo2589± 14
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junior 8 — 1 Thread | 2741 | 9 | 3.5/9 | 38.9 % | +2/=3/−4 | 2662 |
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 10 | 1.5/10 | 15.0 % | +1/=1/−8 | 2426 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 29 | 7.5/29 | 25.9 % | +5/=5/−19 | 2516 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 3.5/10 | 35.0 % | +1/=5/−4 | 2558 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 53 | 22.5/53 | 42.5 % | +9/=27/−17 | 2602 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 15 | 9/15 | 60.0 % | +6/=6/−3 | 2682 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 14 | 7/14 | 50.0 % | +4/=6/−4 | 2599 |
| Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread | 2569 | 21 | 11.5/21 | 54.8 % | +9/=5/−7 | 2602 |
| Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread | 2434 | 34 | 24/34 | 70.6 % | +20/=8/−6 | 2586 |
Meilleur : 71 % vs Rebel 6.0 · plus dur : 15 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU.
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2569 · 110 parties · 39.5 % · err ±19
Cote Ordo2569± 19
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads | 2727 | 10 | 3.5/10 | 35.0 % | +3/=1/−6 | 2620 |
| Junior 7 — 1 Thread | 2699 | 20 | 9/20 | 45.0 % | +8/=2/−10 | 2665 |
| List 512 — 1 Thread | 2666 | 10 | 4.5/10 | 45.0 % | +2/=5/−3 | 2631 |
| Fritz 6 — 1 Thread | 2655 | 21 | 7/21 | 33.3 % | +5/=4/−12 | 2535 |
| Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread | 2611 | 15 | 4.5/15 | 30.0 % | +3/=3/−9 | 2464 |
| Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread | 2599 | 13 | 5.5/13 | 42.3 % | +2/=7/−4 | 2545 |
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 21 | 9.5/21 | 45.2 % | +7/=5/−9 | 2555 |
Meilleur : 45 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 30 % vs Nimzo 8.
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread
Cote Ordo 2434 · 34 parties · 29.4 % · err ±31
Cote Ordo2434± 31
| Adversaire | Cote | Pt. | Score | % | W/D/L | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread | 2589 | 34 | 10/34 | 29.4 % | +6/=8/−20 | 2437 |
Meilleur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32.
Étalonnage · pontage liste → CCRL
Aligner le laboratoire sur l'échelle CCRL
Trois moteurs-ancres, étagés sur l'échelle, mesurés à pleine cadence sur le Ryzen 9 7950X3D contre des adversaires bridés pour reproduire leur force CCRL. Ces valeurs serviront de points d'ancrage fixes pour le réétalonnage global de la liste par Ordo.
Méthode. Le moteur cible joue à pleine cadence (15 s/coup) ; chaque ancre est bridée (~½ temps, 8 s/coup) pour rejouer sa force CCRL sur le Ryzen. Le bridage neutralise l'avantage de fréquence par cœur — seuls les threads supplémentaires par rapport à la référence CCRL produisent un gain.
Formule. perf = moyenne des ancres + 400 · log₁₀(p / (1−p))
Écart-type. σ = 400 · √(p(1−p) / N) · (forme « table », colonne Err ±)
Formule. perf = moyenne des ancres + 400 · log₁₀(p / (1−p))
Écart-type. σ = 400 · √(p(1−p) / N) · (forme « table », colonne Err ±)
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 threads
| Adversaire (ancre) | Cote CCRL | Score | % | W / D / L | Perf ind. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caissa 1.17 | 3601 | 3.5 / 20 | 17,50 % | +0 / =7 / −13 | 3332 |
| Stockfish 10 | 3522 | 6.5 / 20 | 32,50 % | +0 / =13 / −7 | 3395 |
| Ethereal 12.75 | 3454 | 9.5 / 20 | 47,50 % | +1 / =17 / −2 | 3437 |
| Wasp 5.50 | 3325 | 14.0 / 20 | 70,00 % | +9 / =10 / −1 | 3472 |
| Gull 3 | 3223 | 12.0 / 20 | 60,00 % | +4 / =16 / −0 | 3293 |
| Total | moy. 3425 | 45.5 / 100 | 45,50 % | +14 / =63 / −23 | 3394 |
Performance Elo
3394
± 20 (table) · ± 9 (log)
Cohérence. Gain +67 sur la cote CCRL 4CPU, attribuable au doublement 4 → 8 threads (la fréquence par cœur étant neutralisée par le bridage temporel).
List 5.12 — 1 thread
| Adversaire (ancre) | Cote CCRL | Score | % | W / D / L | Perf ind. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toga II 1.2.1a | 2766 | 8.0 / 20 | 40,00 % | +5 / =6 / −9 | 2696 |
| Spike 1.1 | 2690 | 10.0 / 20 | 50,00 % | +6 / =8 / −6 | 2690 |
| Ruffian 1.0.5 | 2599 | 10.0 / 20 | 50,00 % | +6 / =8 / −6 | 2599 |
| Hermann 2.8 | 2487 | 22.0 / 32 | 68,75 % | +16 / =12 / −4 | 2624 |
| Total | moy. 2635,5 | 50.0 / 92 | 54,35 % | +33 / =34 / −25 | 2666 |
Performance Elo
2666
± 21 (table) · ± 9 (log)
Cohérence. List mesuré à 2666 pour une cote CCRL de 2608, soit +58 au-dessus. En mono-thread (même nombre de threads que sa référence CCRL), il n'y a pas de bonus SMP ; l'écart de +58 tient au pool retenu sans Tao (avec Tao inclus, la perf revenait vers ~2610).
Note. List fait 50 % contre Ruffian (2599) et contre Spike (2690), deux ancres à 91 points d'écart — légère non-transitivité / bruit résiduel qui fixe le plancher de précision à ± 21. Hermann (perf 2624) est l'ancre la plus basse en perf après régression vers la moyenne (72,7 % à 11 parties → 68,75 % à 32) ; Tao 5.6, statistiquement non distinguable de Hermann (z = 0,64), a été écarté du pool retenu.
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 threads
| Adversaire (ancre) | Cote CCRL | Score | % | W / D / L | Perf ind. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igel 2.3.1 | 3097 | 6.0 / 20 | 30,00 % | +0 / =12 / −8 | 2950 |
| Deep Shredder 12 | 3043 | 10.5 / 20 | 52,50 % | +6 / =9 / −5 | 3060 |
| Wasp 2.00 | 2946 | 9.0 / 20 | 45,00 % | +5 / =8 / −7 | 2911 |
| Stockfish 1.4 JA | 2845 | 15.5 / 20 | 77,50 % | +12 / =7 / −1 | 3060 |
| Lux 5.0 | 2811 | 15.0 / 20 | 75,00 % | +11 / =8 / −1 | 3002 |
| Total | moy. 2948 | 56.0 / 100 | 56,00 % | +34 / =44 / −22 | 2990 |
Performance Elo
2990
± 20 (table) · ± 9 (log)
Cohérence. Écart +79 sur la cote CCRL 4CPU, attribuable au doublement 4 → 8 threads (la fréquence par cœur étant neutralisée par le bridage temporel). À 20 parties par ancre le profil est homogène : Igel (perf 2950) et Wasp 2.00 (2911) alignés en bas, DS12 et Stockfish 1.4 en haut (3060) — plus aucun outlier de style.
Triplet d'ancrage CCRL
| Moteur | Th. | Cote CCRL | Cote Ryzen 9 | Écart CCRL | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Shredder 13 x64 | 8T | 3327 | 3394 ± 20 | +67 | terminé |
| Glaurung 2.2 JA | 8T | 2911 | 2990 ± 20 | +79 | terminé |
| List 5.12 | 1T | 2608 | 2666 ± 21 | +58 | terminé |
Lecture. Les écarts au référentiel CCRL sont propres à chaque moteur et ne suivent pas le nombre de threads. Aucun facteur uniforme ne s'applique : le réétalonnage passe par Ordo, en épinglant ces trois ancres à leur valeur CCRL mesurée pour redériver la liste sur le référentiel CCRL.