Performance elo, tournois maison

Classement général · échelle Ordo

Performance Elo — tournois maison

Cotes Ordo (fit global) depuis le PGN du laboratoire, complétées des moteurs dédiés figés. Cliquer un moteur ✱ fait défiler vers son débrief.

Rang	Moteur / Système	Hardware	Elo	Parties	Err ±
1	✱ Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3707	120	±18
2	✱ Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3692	191	±14
3	✱ Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3687	191	±14
4	✱ Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3676	241	±13
5	✱ Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3665	151	±16
6	✱ Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3655	251	±13
7	✱ Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3654	100	±20
8	✱ Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3635	274	±12
9	✱ Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3634	110	±19
10	✱ Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3596	147	±16
11	✱ Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3555	206	±14
12	✱ Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3551	371	±10
13	✱ Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3527	198	±14
14	✱ Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3512	215	±14
15	✱ Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3510	112	±19
16	✱ Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3493	185	±15
17	✱ Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3485	90	±21
18	✱ Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3480	160	±16
19	✱ Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3452	144	±17
20	✱ Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3452	180	±15
21	✱ Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3450	168	±15
22	✱ Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3445	373	±10
23	✱ Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3442	70	±24
24	✱ rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3412	179	±15
25	✱ Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3394	412	±10
26	✱ Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3375	180	±14
27	✱ Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3336	154	±16
28	✱ Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3335	180	±14
29	✱ Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3313	158	±16
30	✱ Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3258	143	±17
31	✱ Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3251	181	±15
32	✱ Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3206	80	±22
33	✱ Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3179	101	±20
34	✱ Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3171	128	±18
35	✱ Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3166	108	±19
36	✱ Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3162	142	±17
37	✱ Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3043	161	±16
38	✱ Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	3035	79	±22
39	✱ Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2990	122	±18
40	✱ Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2990	162	±16
41	✱ Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2931	163	±16
42	✱ Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2879	175	±15
43	✱ Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2862	74	±23
44	✱ Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2851	254	±12
45	✱ Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2798	60	±26
46	✱ Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2788	90	±20
47	✱ Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2782	169	±15
48	✱ Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2772	90	±21
49	✱ ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2758	219	±13
50	✱ Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2752	103	±20
51	✱ Junior 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2741	138	±17
52	✱ Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2732	70	±24
53	✱ Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2727	118	±18
54	✱ Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2721	121	±18
55	✱ Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2719	186	±15
56	✱ Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2700	189	±14
57	✱ Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2684	85	±22
58	✱ SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2670	193	±14
59	✱ List 512 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2666	212	±14
60	✱ Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2656	368	±10
61	✱ Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2612	171	±15
62	✱ Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2599	126	±18
63	✱ Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2589	195	±14
64	✱ Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2570	110	±19
65	Cray Blitz 4.9h	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2531	70	±19
66	✱ Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2435	34	±31
67	Mephisto Genius 68030 London	cb-emu	2363	349	±13
68	Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	cb-emu	2315	349	±15
69	Mephisto RISC II	cb-emu	2266	342	±16
70	Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	cb-emu	2247	348	±17
71	Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2233	238	±21
72	Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	cb-emu	2226	350	±17
73	Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	cb-emu	2153	347	±19
74	Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	cb-emu	2135	349	±19
75	Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	cb-emu	2125	350	±19
76	Novag Sapphire	cb-emu	2123	334	±20
77	Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100%	2108	264	±23
78	Fidelity Designer Mach IV	cb-emu	2090	350	±20
79	Fidelity Designer Mach III	cb-emu	2029	348	±21
80	Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	cb-emu	1973	346	±21
81	Novag Zircon II	cb-emu	1970	334	±22
82	Saitek President	cb-emu	1958	344	±21
83	Mephisto Nigel Short	cb-emu	1956	349	±21
84	Saitek Maestro D++	cb-emu	1923	348	±21
85	Novag Super Forte C v3.6	cb-emu	1901	349	±21
86	Novag Super Expert C v3.6	cb-emu	1894	349	±21
87	Novag Turquoise	cb-emu	1871	344	±21
88	Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	cb-emu	1856	350	±21
89	Mephisto Modena (set 3)	cb-emu	1850	349	±21
90	Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	cb-emu	1844	348	±21
91	Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	cb-emu	1835	350	±21
92	Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	cb-emu	1808	348	±21
93	Fidelity Designer 2100	cb-emu	1808	348	±21
94	Novag Constellation Forte A	cb-emu	1803	350	±21
95	Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	cb-emu	1764	349	±20
96	Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	cb-emu	1742	347	±20
97	Saitek Prisma	cb-emu	1724	349	±19
98	Fidelity Designer 2000	cb-emu	1703	348	±19
99	Novag Super VIP v3.7	cb-emu	1640	348	±17
100	Tandy Chess Champion 2150	cb-emu	1577	346	±16
101	Saitek Turbo 16K	cb-emu	1437	348	±11
102	Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	cb-emu	1285	347	±8

✱ = débrief cliquable · moteurs en italique = figés (machines dédiées)

Débriefs · adversaire par adversaire

Débrief de chaque gauntlet

Perf locale = cote Ordo de l'adversaire + 400·log₁₀(p/(1−p)). Sa dispersion reflète la transitivité du moteur.

Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3707 · 120 parties · 57.1 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3707± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3692
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3687
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3711
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3707
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3781
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3667

Meilleur : 70 % vs Dragon Komodo 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3692 · 191 parties · 57.6 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3692± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3707
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3687
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3693
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3665
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3672
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3742
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	8/15	53.3 %	+1/=14/−0	3657
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3733
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3724
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3640

Meilleur : 72 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3687 · 191 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3687± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3707
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3692
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3676
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3665
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3689
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3724
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3704
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3708
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3682
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3622

Meilleur : 68 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 20 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3676 · 241 parties · 57.9 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3676± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3672
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3674
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3687
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3665
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3672
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3654	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3671
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3705
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+2/=13/−0	3680
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3708
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3650
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3698
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3582
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3699
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3686

Meilleur : 77 % vs Caissa 1.5 8CPU · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 18 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3665 · 151 parties · 54.6 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3665± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3692
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3687
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3676
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3655
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3634
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	9/16	56.2 %	+2/=14/−0	3640
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3703
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3622

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Dragon Komodo 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3655 · 251 parties · 55.0 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3655± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3654
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3674
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3652
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3658
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3665
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3654	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3619
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3670
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3634
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+1/=15/−0	3618
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3604
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3616
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3753
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3707

Meilleur : 80 % vs Ethereal 12.75 8CPU · plus dur : 42 % vs Stockfish 18 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3654 · 100 parties · 55.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3654± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3658
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3689
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3687
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3644
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3586

Meilleur : 62 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3635 · 274 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3635± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3584
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3598
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3605
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3620
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3654	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3601
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3659
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	19	13/19	68.4 %	+7/=12/−0	3661
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3620
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3599
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3686
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3652
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3776
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3616
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3717

Meilleur : 90 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3634 · 110 parties · 45.0 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3634± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3560
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	15	7/15	46.7 %	+0/=14/−1	3669
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3616
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+0/=13/−2	3629
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3665
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3655
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3667

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fire 9.3 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 18 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3596 · 147 parties · 42.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3596± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3707	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3637
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3555
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3574
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3563
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	16	7/16	43.8 %	+0/=14/−2	3622
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+0/=15/−1	3633
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3634	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3563
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+1/=13/−2	3534
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3688

Meilleur : 69 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 31 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3555 · 206 parties · 46.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3555± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3523
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3560
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3581
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3518
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3654	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3565
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+2/=13/−1	3618
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3580
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	13	7/13	53.8 %	+1/=12/−0	3537
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	15	8/15	53.3 %	+2/=12/−1	3516
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3575
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	3573
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3540
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+3/=7/−0	3550

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ethereal 11.75 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3551 · 371 parties · 52.2 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3551± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3603
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3687	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3616
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3529
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3665	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3595
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3602
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3654	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3619
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3527
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3596	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3459
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3526
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3635
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3477
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	12	7/12	58.3 %	+2/=10/−0	3568
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3493
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3480
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3540
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	32	20/32	62.5 %	+9/=22/−1	3534
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3539
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3541
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3522
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+12/=7/−1	3550

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3527 · 198 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3527± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3566
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	19	6/19	31.6 %	+0/=12/−7	3501
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3444
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3529
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3504
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3572
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+8/=11/−0	3568
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3502
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3502
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3604

Meilleur : 82 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3512 · 215 parties · 52.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3512± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3605
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3414
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3527
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3586
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3510
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3504
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3516
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3446
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3522
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3550

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3510 · 112 parties · 53.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3510± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	13	6/13	46.2 %	+0/=12/−1	3529
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	12	5/12	41.7 %	+0/=10/−2	3493
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	3519
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3485	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3485
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+4/=9/−0	3590
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+0/=11/−1	3423
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	12	8/12	66.7 %	+4/=8/−0	3571
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3474
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3513

Meilleur : 67 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 42 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3493 · 185 parties · 48.4 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3493± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3469
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3655	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3440
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	15	7/15	46.7 %	+1/=12/−2	3532
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3551
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	3483
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3532
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3470
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3468
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3498
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3513
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3483

Meilleur : 62 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 22 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3485 · 75 parties · 54.0 % · err ±23

Cote Ordo3485± 23

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3510
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3480
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3545
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3445
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+3/=11/−1	3441

Meilleur : 63 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3480 · 160 parties · 47.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3480± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3676	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3469
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3460
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3551
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+0/=9/−4	3399
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3440
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3485	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3485
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3487
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3503
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3516
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3477

Meilleur : 60 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 8CPU · plus dur : 23 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3452 · 144 parties · 50.7 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3452± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	3435
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+1/=11/−0	3539
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3475
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3445
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3369
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3445
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3513
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	14	8/14	57.1 %	+3/=10/−1	3444
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	13	9/13	69.2 %	+5/=8/−0	3477
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	13	8/13	61.5 %	+3/=10/−0	3394

Meilleur : 69 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3452 · 180 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3452± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3488
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3462
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3475
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3459
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3428
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	12/20	60.0 %	+5/=14/−1	3482
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+5/=11/−4	3393
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3424

Meilleur : 62 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3450 · 168 parties · 53.0 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3450± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	12	4/12	33.3 %	+0/=8/−4	3389
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3475
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3485	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3390
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3427
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3534
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+1/=15/−2	3426
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3407
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3577
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3481

Meilleur : 80 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3445 · 373 parties · 48.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3445± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3394
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	3460
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	32	12/32	37.5 %	+1/=22/−9	3462
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3400
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3442
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3481
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3440
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3485	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3485
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3409
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3452
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3469
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+2/=15/−1	3470
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3442	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3407
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3394
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	39	22.5/39	57.7 %	+7/=31/−1	3448
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3446
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	19	14/19	73.7 %	+11/=6/−2	3515
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3424
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+9/=9/−1	3469

Meilleur : 74 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3442 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo3442± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3555	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+0/=7/−3	3448
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3510	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3439
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3422
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3480	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3445
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3382
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3485
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3480

Meilleur : 55 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3412 · 179 parties · 42.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3412± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3394
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3424
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+0/=11/−8	3371
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3477
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	8/20	40.0 %	+1/=14/−5	3381
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3463
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	11/20	55.0 %	+5/=12/−3	3410
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3387

Meilleur : 57 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3394 · 412 parties · 51.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3394± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3253
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3404
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3420
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3442
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3493	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3404
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3485	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+1/=11/−3	3438
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	14	6/14	42.9 %	+1/=10/−3	3402
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3381
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3450
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	39	16.5/39	42.3 %	+1/=31/−7	3391
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3412
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3446
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	25	13.5/25	54.0 %	+5/=17/−3	3364
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3370
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	20	12/20	60.0 %	+6/=12/−2	3383
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	3385
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3378
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3448
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+10/=9/−0	3369
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3543

Meilleur : 90 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3375 · 180 parties · 37.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3375± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3394
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3404
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3400
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3365
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+4/=11/−5	3434
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3375
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	9/20	45.0 %	+3/=12/−5	3377
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3324
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3335	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3335

Meilleur : 50 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3336 · 154 parties · 47.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3336± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	13	4/13	30.8 %	+0/=8/−5	3311
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3209
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	19	5/19	26.3 %	+2/=6/−11	3266
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	25	11.5/25	46.0 %	+3/=17/−5	3366
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	26	13.5/26	51.9 %	+5/=17/−4	3326
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	26	18/26	69.2 %	+11/=14/−1	3399
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	25	17.5/25	70.0 %	+11/=13/−1	3398

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 3.75 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3335 · 180 parties · 31.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3335± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3635	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3253
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3551	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+1/=7/−12	3336
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3527	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3258
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3512	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3297
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3452	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3363
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3356
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3412	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3359
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3359
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3375	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3375

Meilleur : 50 % vs Laser 1.7 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3313 · 158 parties · 46.5 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3313± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3452	13	5/13	38.5 %	+0/=10/−3	3371
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3450	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3282
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3445	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+1/=9/−9	3289
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+2/=12/−6	3324
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	26	12.5/26	48.1 %	+4/=17/−5	3323
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3311
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	20	11/20	55.0 %	+6/=10/−4	3286
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	3335

Meilleur : 72 % vs Naum 4.2 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3258 · 143 parties · 51.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3258± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	26	8/26	30.8 %	+1/=14/−11	3195
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3260
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+1/=9/−3	3197
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	3237
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	3380
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3248
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	13	9/13	69.2 %	+6/=6/−1	3302
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	13	11/13	84.6 %	+9/=4/−0	3339

Meilleur : 85 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 31 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3251 · 181 parties · 51.1 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3251± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3336	25	7.5/25	30.0 %	+1/=13/−11	3189
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	20	9/20	45.0 %	+4/=10/−6	3278
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+3/=9/−1	3312
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3206	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3223
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	3258
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	29	17/29	58.6 %	+7/=20/−2	3232
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+10/=17/−3	3249
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3309

Meilleur : 70 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 30 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3206 · 80 parties · 56.2 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3206± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3234
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3232
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3162
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3190

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Wasp 3.75 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3179 · 101 parties · 44.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3179± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3125
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	3200
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	3173
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3206	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3153
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3242
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3166
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	3232
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3190

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 18 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3171 · 128 parties · 57.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3171± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	3049
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	29	12/29	41.4 %	+2/=20/−7	3191
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3109
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3162
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+9/=5/−1	3250
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	15	12.5/15	83.3 %	+10/=5/−0	3270
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3197
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	15	11/15	73.3 %	+8/=6/−1	3107

Meilleur : 83 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 · plus dur : 23 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3166 · 108 parties · 36.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3166± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+0/=9/−10	3191
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3313	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	3144
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3177
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+3/=17/−10	3169
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3179
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3162

Meilleur : 50 % vs Senpai 2.0 8CPU · plus dur : 24 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3162 · 142 parties · 46.5 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3162± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3012
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	13	4/13	30.8 %	+1/=6/−6	3118
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3251	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3104
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3206	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3206
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	3109
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3171
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3166	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3166
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	16	13/16	81.2 %	+11/=4/−1	3298
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	16	12.5/16	78.1 %	+11/=3/−2	3211

Meilleur : 81 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3043 · 161 parties · 46.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3043± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3258	13	2/13	15.4 %	+0/=4/−9	2962
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3206	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3059
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3179	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3032
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+1/=5/−9	2965
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	16	3/16	18.8 %	+1/=4/−11	2907
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3035	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3052
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	16	9/16	56.2 %	+4/=10/−2	3034
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	17	10.5/17	61.8 %	+6/=9/−2	3073
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+11/=5/−1	3166
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+10/=7/−0	3114

Meilleur : 79 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 · plus dur : 15 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3035 · 79 parties · 56.3 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3035± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3026
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3098
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+9/=5/−6	3043
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+5/=11/−3	2968

Meilleur : 65 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 · plus dur : 48 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2990 · 122 parties · 52.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2990± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	15	2.5/15	16.7 %	+0/=5/−10	2892
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	16	7/16	43.8 %	+2/=10/−4	2999
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3035	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	2927
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	3013
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3026
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	16	10/16	62.5 %	+6/=8/−2	2968
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+11/=7/−1	3054
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3037
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3527

Meilleur : 76 % vs Shredder 10 UCI · plus dur : 17 % vs Wasp 2.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 2990 · 162 parties · 50.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2990± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	2965
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3162	16	3.5/16	21.9 %	+2/=3/−11	2940
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	17	6.5/17	38.2 %	+2/=9/−6	2960
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3035	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+6/=5/−9	2982
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2967
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2931
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	3048
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	2978
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	20	16/20	80.0 %	+14/=4/−2	2999

Meilleur : 80 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 22 % vs Komodo64 3.

↑ retour au classement

Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2931 · 163 parties · 48.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2931± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3171	15	4/15	26.7 %	+1/=6/−8	2995
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+1/=5/−11	2808
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3035	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+3/=11/−5	2998
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	2895
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2990
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	17	9/17	52.9 %	+5/=8/−4	2900
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2862	24	15/24	62.5 %	+11/=8/−5	2950
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	19	11/19	57.9 %	+7/=8/−4	2906
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	2900

Meilleur : 69 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2879 · 175 parties · 50.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2879± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3043	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+0/=7/−10	2808
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	16	6/16	37.5 %	+2/=8/−6	2902
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2822
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	17	8/17	47.1 %	+4/=8/−5	2911
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2862	25	12/25	48.0 %	+8/=8/−9	2848
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	27	17/27	63.0 %	+13/=8/−6	2943
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2973
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	27	17/27	63.0 %	+12/=10/−5	2850
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	2896

Meilleur : 72 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 10 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2862 · 74 parties · 46.6 % · err ±23

Cote Ordo2862± 23

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	24	9/24	37.5 %	+5/=8/−11	2842
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	25	13/25	52.0 %	+9/=8/−8	2893
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2851

Meilleur : 52 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 · plus dur : 38 % vs Loop M1-T 4CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2851 · 254 parties · 55.5 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2851± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+1/=7/−11	2787
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	2863
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	19	8/19	42.1 %	+4/=8/−7	2876
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	27	10/27	37.0 %	+6/=8/−13	2787
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2862	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2862
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	34	21/34	61.8 %	+12/=18/−4	2841
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2732	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	2891
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	2918
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2829
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	35	24.5/35	70.0 %	+19/=11/−5	2866
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2754
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	21	16.5/21	78.6 %	+13/=7/−1	2896

Meilleur : 79 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 24 % vs Gull 1.2 x64.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2798 · 60 parties · 56.7 % · err ±26

Cote Ordo2798± 26

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2662
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	15	10/15	66.7 %	+7/=6/−2	2878
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+6/=7/−2	2836
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2814

Meilleur : 67 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 33 % vs Deep Junior 7.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2788 · 90 parties · 62.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2788± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	15	8/15	53.3 %	+4/=8/−3	2775
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2718
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	2840
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2818
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	15	9/15	60.0 %	+7/=4/−4	2736
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	15	12/15	80.0 %	+9/=6/−0	2852

Meilleur : 80 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 47 % vs Junior 8.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2782 · 169 parties · 58.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2782± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2688
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2798	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	2919
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2783
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2741
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2732	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2707
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2766
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2791
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+9/=1/−5	2814
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2700
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2684
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	2839
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2768
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2847

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 46 % vs Deep Fritz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2772 · 90 parties · 60.6 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2772± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2811
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2768
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	2801
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+7/=3/−3	2811
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2880
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2748
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2585

Meilleur : 77 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 46 % vs Nimzo 8.

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2758 · 219 parties · 44.1 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2758± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2711
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	4/20	20.0 %	+2/=4/−14	2749
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2931	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2788
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	27	10/27	37.0 %	+5/=10/−12	2787
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	34	13/34	38.2 %	+4/=18/−12	2768
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2798	15	5/15	33.3 %	+2/=6/−7	2678
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2757
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2732	14	8/14	57.1 %	+7/=2/−5	2782
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2756
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	2840
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2719
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+6/=3/−4	2724
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+6/=3/−4	2720
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2738

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 · plus dur : 20 % vs Glaurung 2.2 JA 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2752 · 103 parties · 56.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2752± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	7/15	46.7 %	+3/=8/−4	2765
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2713
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2732	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+3/=7/−4	2707
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2789
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	13	8/13	61.5 %	+5/=6/−2	2752
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2786
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+7/=5/−1	2830
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2670

Meilleur : 73 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 42 % vs Fritz 7.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2741 · 138 parties · 55.1 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2741± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2798	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+2/=7/−6	2704
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	2812
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2782
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2745
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2800
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2670
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3004
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	28	15/28	53.6 %	+10/=10/−8	2681
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2732
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2720
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2667

Meilleur : 54 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Shredder 6.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2732 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo2732± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2692
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2807
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	14	6/14	42.9 %	+5/=2/−7	2708
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+4/=7/−3	2777
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	14	6/14	42.9 %	+3/=6/−5	2669

Meilleur : 54 % vs Deep Junior 7 · plus dur : 29 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 2727 · 118 parties · 50.0 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2727± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2990	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2190
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2879	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	2711
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2660
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2744
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2661
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1870
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2745
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2777
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	9	7/9	77.8 %	+6/=2/−1	2829
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	9	7/9	77.8 %	+7/=0/−2	2817
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2890
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2677

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2721 · 121 parties · 51.2 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2721± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2743
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2712
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2723
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2663
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2673
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2700
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2754
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2741
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2666
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	29	19/29	65.5 %	+15/=8/−6	2768

Meilleur : 66 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 35 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2719 · 186 parties · 45.2 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2719± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	35	10.5/35	30.0 %	+5/=11/−19	2704
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2798	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2704
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	2668
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+5/=1/−9	2687
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	2690
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2637
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2732	14	8/14	57.1 %	+5/=6/−3	2782
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2768
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2779
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	34	21.5/34	63.2 %	+14/=15/−5	2750

Meilleur : 63 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 30 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2700 · 189 parties · 56.1 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2700± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2782
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+3/=3/−7	2661
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2664
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2766
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2721
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	9	6/9	66.7 %	+6/=0/−3	2791
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2703
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2617
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	24	14/24	58.3 %	+13/=2/−9	2670
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	23	14/23	60.9 %	+10/=8/−5	2676
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	29	21.5/29	74.1 %	+19/=5/−5	2772
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	20	11/20	55.0 %	+10/=2/−8	2605

Meilleur : 74 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 35 % vs Fritz 7.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2684 · 85 parties · 44.1 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo2684± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2780
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2782
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2723
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2651
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2624
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2600
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2631
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2727

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0.

↑ retour au classement

SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2670 · 193 parties · 41.5 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2670± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2851	21	4.5/21	21.4 %	+1/=7/−13	2625
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2641
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2614
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2562
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+4/=3/−6	2704
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	13	5/13	38.5 %	+2/=6/−5	2671
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2741
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3527
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2651
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	9	3/9	33.3 %	+3/=0/−6	2580
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2754
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+8/=7/−5	2719
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	39	22/39	56.4 %	+12/=20/−7	2701

Meilleur : 60 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 21 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

List 512 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2666 · 212 parties · 45.0 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2666± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	6/15	40.0 %	+4/=4/−7	2718
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2680
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2690
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+4/=3/−6	2704
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2632
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2403
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2649
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2721
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2663
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2719
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+5/=7/−8	2618
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	29	12.5/29	43.1 %	+7/=11/−11	2608
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2759
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2707
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2696
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2605

Meilleur : 70 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 33 % vs Hiarcs 8.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2656 · 368 parties · 48.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2656± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2782	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2591
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2758	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2676
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+1/=5/−7	2579
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	28	13/28	46.4 %	+8/=10/−10	2716
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2607
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2721	29	10/29	34.5 %	+6/=8/−15	2609
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2719	34	12.5/34	36.8 %	+5/=15/−14	2625
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2739
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2684	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2614
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2670	39	17/39	43.6 %	+7/=20/−12	2626
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	29	16.5/29	56.9 %	+11/=11/−7	2714
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	34	22.5/34	66.2 %	+15/=15/−4	2728
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	33	18/33	54.5 %	+13/=10/−10	2631
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	53	30.5/53	57.5 %	+17/=27/−9	2642
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	21	14/21	66.7 %	+12/=4/−5	2690

Meilleur : 67 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 25 % vs Deep Junior 7.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2612 · 171 parties · 40.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2612± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2788	15	3/15	20.0 %	+0/=6/−9	2548
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2772	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2798
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2752	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2694
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2621
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	2/9	22.2 %	+1/=2/−6	2510
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	24	10/24	41.7 %	+9/=2/−13	2642
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2519
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	34	11.5/34	33.8 %	+4/=15/−15	2540
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2646
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	15	6/15	40.0 %	+3/=6/−6	2518
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2717

Meilleur : 70 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 20 % vs Fritz 8.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2599 · 126 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2599± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2621
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	9	2/9	22.2 %	+2/=0/−7	2510
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	23	9/23	39.1 %	+5/=8/−10	2623
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2558
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	33	15/33	45.5 %	+10/=10/−13	2625
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2565
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2589
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+4/=7/−2	2624

Meilleur : 58 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 35 % vs List 512.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2589 · 195 parties · 46.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2589± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2741	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2663
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2426
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	29	7.5/29	25.9 %	+5/=5/−19	2517
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2558
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	53	22.5/53	42.5 %	+9/=27/−17	2603
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	15	9/15	60.0 %	+6/=6/−3	2682
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2599
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2570	21	11.5/21	54.8 %	+9/=5/−7	2603
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2435	34	24/34	70.6 %	+20/=8/−6	2587

Meilleur : 71 % vs Rebel 6.0 · plus dur : 15 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2570 · 110 parties · 39.5 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2570± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2727	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2620
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2700	20	9/20	45.0 %	+8/=2/−10	2665
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2631
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2656	21	7/21	33.3 %	+5/=4/−12	2536
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2612	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2464
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2599	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+2/=7/−4	2545
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	21	9.5/21	45.2 %	+7/=5/−9	2556

Meilleur : 45 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 30 % vs Nimzo 8.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2435 · 34 parties · 29.4 % · err ±31

Cote Ordo2435± 31

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2589	34	10/34	29.4 %	+6/=8/−20	2437

Meilleur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32.

↑ retour au classement

Débriefs · adversaire par adversaire

Débrief de chaque gauntlet

Perf locale = cote Ordo de l'adversaire + 400·log₁₀(p/(1−p)). Sa dispersion reflète la transitivité du moteur.

Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3692 · 140 parties · 57.9 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3692± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3683
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3692
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3674
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3679
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3745
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3647
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3721

Meilleur : 72 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3683 · 140 parties · 56.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3683± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3692
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3675
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3674
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3697
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3727
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3629
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3679

Meilleur : 68 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 20 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3675 · 175 parties · 57.1 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3675± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3674
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3683
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3674
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3679
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3657	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3674
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3708
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3706
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3647
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3586
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3702

Meilleur : 77 % vs Caissa 1.5 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3674 · 120 parties · 55.0 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3674± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3692
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3683
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3675
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3662
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3629
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3699

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3662 · 200 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3662± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3674
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3648
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3657
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3674
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3657	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3622
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3673
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3611
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3620
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3757
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3711

Meilleur : 80 % vs Ethereal 12.75 8CPU · plus dur : 45 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3657 · 100 parties · 55.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3657± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3657
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3697
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3690
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3593
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3641

Meilleur : 62 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU · plus dur : 48 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3638 · 274 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3638± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3584
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3594
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3604
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3627
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3657	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3604
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3666
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	19	13/19	68.4 %	+7/=12/−0	3666
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3623
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3603
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3690
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3656
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3776
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3620
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3720

Meilleur : 90 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3558 · 355 parties · 53.1 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo3558± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3603
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3612
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3527
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3603
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3610
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3657	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3622
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3530
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3523
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3639
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	12	7/12	58.3 %	+2/=10/−0	3575
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3481
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3496
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3478
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3544
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	32	20/32	62.5 %	+9/=22/−1	3538
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3542
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3541
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3526
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+12/=7/−1	3553

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Fritz 20 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3552 · 190 parties · 46.3 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3552± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3692	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3523
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3683	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3556
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3580
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3674	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3526
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3657	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3568
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3588
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	13	7/13	53.8 %	+1/=12/−0	3544
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	15	8/15	53.3 %	+2/=12/−1	3519
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3572
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	3575
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3544
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+3/=7/−0	3553

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ethereal 11.75 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Caissa 1.24 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3531 · 198 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3531± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3573
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	19	6/19	31.6 %	+0/=12/−7	3503
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3451
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3533
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3508
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3576
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+8/=11/−0	3571
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3502
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3506
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3608

Meilleur : 82 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3517 · 97 parties · 54.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3517± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	12	5/12	41.7 %	+0/=10/−2	3500
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	13	6/13	46.2 %	+0/=12/−1	3525
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	3522
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+4/=9/−0	3588
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	12	8/12	66.7 %	+4/=8/−0	3580
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+0/=11/−1	3426
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3478
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3516

Meilleur : 67 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 42 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3516 · 215 parties · 52.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3516± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3604
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3421
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3530
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3593
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3514
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3508
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3520
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3450
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3526
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3553

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3496 · 185 parties · 48.4 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3496± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3675	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3468
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3662	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3447
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3558
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	15	7/15	46.7 %	+1/=12/−2	3529
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	3490
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3530
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3476
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3472
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3502
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3516
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3483

Meilleur : 62 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 22 % vs Rebel-16.3 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3478 · 110 parties · 47.7 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3478± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3558
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3457
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+0/=9/−4	3407
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3443
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3512
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3490
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3480

Meilleur : 57 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3459 · 153 parties · 54.6 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3459± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	12	4/12	33.3 %	+0/=8/−4	3397
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3478
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3425
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3536
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+1/=15/−2	3430
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3410
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3580
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3484

Meilleur : 80 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3456 · 180 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3456± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3491
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3470
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3479
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3463
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3432
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	12/20	60.0 %	+5/=14/−1	3486
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+5/=11/−4	3396
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3427

Meilleur : 62 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3455 · 144 parties · 50.7 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3455± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	3432
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+1/=11/−0	3546
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3478
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3443
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3377
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3449
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3516
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	14	8/14	57.1 %	+3/=10/−1	3444
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	13	9/13	69.2 %	+5/=8/−0	3480
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	13	8/13	61.5 %	+3/=10/−0	3398

Meilleur : 69 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 33 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3449 · 338 parties · 49.0 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo3449± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3397
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	32	12/32	37.5 %	+1/=22/−9	3470
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	3457
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3404
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3488
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3445
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3443
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+2/=15/−1	3478
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3473
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3455
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3445	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3410
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3398
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	39	22.5/39	57.7 %	+7/=31/−1	3448
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3450
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	19	14/19	73.7 %	+11/=6/−2	3518
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3427
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+9/=9/−1	3472

Meilleur : 74 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3445 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo3445± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3552	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+0/=7/−3	3445
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3517	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3447
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3425
Stockfish 8 64 POPCNT — 8 Threads	3478	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3443
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3494
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3384
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3484

Meilleur : 55 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 8CPU · plus dur : 35 % vs Wasp 7.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3415 · 179 parties · 42.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3415± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3397
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3432
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+0/=11/−8	3375
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3481
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	8/20	40.0 %	+1/=14/−5	3385
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3467
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	11/20	55.0 %	+5/=12/−3	3414
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3391

Meilleur : 57 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3394 · 397 parties · 51.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3394± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3256
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3411
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3424
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3445
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3496	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3407
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3459
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3385
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	14	6/14	42.9 %	+1/=10/−3	3405
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	39	16.5/39	42.3 %	+1/=31/−7	3395
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3415
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3450
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	25	13.5/25	54.0 %	+5/=17/−3	3367
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3373
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	20	12/20	60.0 %	+6/=12/−2	3386
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	3387
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3383
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3455
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+10/=9/−0	3371
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3536

Meilleur : 90 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3379 · 180 parties · 37.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3379± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3397
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3411
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3404
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3369
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+4/=11/−5	3438
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3379
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	9/20	45.0 %	+3/=12/−5	3381
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3324
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3339	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3339

Meilleur : 50 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3340 · 154 parties · 47.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3340± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3218
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	13	4/13	30.8 %	+0/=8/−5	3314
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	19	5/19	26.3 %	+2/=6/−11	3270
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	25	11.5/25	46.0 %	+3/=17/−5	3366
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	26	13.5/26	51.9 %	+5/=17/−4	3329
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	26	18/26	69.2 %	+11/=14/−1	3401
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	25	17.5/25	70.0 %	+11/=13/−1	3403

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 3.75 8CPU · plus dur : 20 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3339 · 180 parties · 31.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3339± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3638	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3256
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3558	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+1/=7/−12	3344
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3531	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3262
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3516	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3301
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3456	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3367
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3361
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3415	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3363
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3359
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3379	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3379

Meilleur : 50 % vs Laser 1.7 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3316 · 158 parties · 46.5 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3316± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3459	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3291
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3455	13	5/13	38.5 %	+0/=10/−3	3373
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+1/=9/−9	3293
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+2/=12/−6	3324
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	26	12.5/26	48.1 %	+4/=17/−5	3326
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3312
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	20	11/20	55.0 %	+6/=10/−4	3291
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	3336

Meilleur : 72 % vs Naum 4.2 8CPU · plus dur : 28 % vs Wasp 5.50 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3260 · 143 parties · 51.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3260± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	26	8/26	30.8 %	+1/=14/−11	3199
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3263
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+1/=9/−3	3202
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	3244
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	3381
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3249
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	13	9/13	69.2 %	+6/=6/−1	3295
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	13	11/13	84.6 %	+9/=4/−0	3334

Meilleur : 85 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 31 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3256 · 161 parties · 50.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3256± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3340	25	7.5/25	30.0 %	+1/=13/−11	3192
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	20	9/20	45.0 %	+4/=10/−6	3281
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+3/=9/−1	3314
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	3264
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	29	17/29	58.6 %	+7/=20/−2	3232
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+10/=17/−3	3250
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3302

Meilleur : 70 % vs Komodo64 3 · plus dur : 30 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3186 · 81 parties · 44.4 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3186± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3125
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	3201
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	3177
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3242
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3168
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	3225
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3185

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 18 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3172 · 128 parties · 57.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3172± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	3051
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	29	12/29	41.4 %	+2/=20/−7	3195
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3115
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3154
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+9/=5/−1	3245
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	15	12.5/15	83.3 %	+10/=5/−0	3280
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3197
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	15	11/15	73.3 %	+8/=6/−1	3096

Meilleur : 83 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 · plus dur : 23 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3168 · 108 parties · 36.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3168± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+0/=9/−10	3191
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3316	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	3147
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3178
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+3/=17/−10	3173
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3186
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3154

Meilleur : 50 % vs Senpai 2.0 8CPU · plus dur : 24 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3154 · 122 parties · 45.9 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3154± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3012
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	13	4/13	30.8 %	+1/=6/−6	3119
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3256	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3109
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	3115
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3172
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3168	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3168
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	16	13/16	81.2 %	+11/=4/−1	3293
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	16	12.5/16	78.1 %	+11/=3/−2	3211

Meilleur : 81 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU · plus dur : 10 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 3038 · 121 parties · 47.9 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3038± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3260	13	2/13	15.4 %	+0/=4/−9	2964
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3186	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3039
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+1/=5/−9	2965
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	16	3/16	18.8 %	+1/=4/−11	2900
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	16	9/16	56.2 %	+4/=10/−2	3044
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	17	10.5/17	61.8 %	+6/=9/−2	3073
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+11/=5/−1	3155
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+10/=7/−0	3111

Meilleur : 79 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 · plus dur : 15 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 3000 · 102 parties · 55.9 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3000± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	15	2.5/15	16.7 %	+0/=5/−10	2892
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	16	7/16	43.8 %	+2/=10/−4	2995
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	3013
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3015
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	16	10/16	62.5 %	+6/=8/−2	2965
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+11/=7/−1	3052
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3035
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3525

Meilleur : 76 % vs Shredder 10 UCI · plus dur : 17 % vs Wasp 2.00 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 2990 · 142 parties · 52.1 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2990± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	2965
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3154	16	3.5/16	21.9 %	+2/=3/−11	2933
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	6.5/17	38.2 %	+2/=9/−6	2955
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2977
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2920
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	3045
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	2975
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	20	16/20	80.0 %	+14/=4/−2	2996

Meilleur : 80 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 22 % vs Komodo64 3.

↑ retour au classement

Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2920 · 144 parties · 48.6 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2920± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3172	15	4/15	26.7 %	+1/=6/−8	2996
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+1/=5/−11	2804
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	2906
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2990
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	17	9/17	52.9 %	+5/=8/−4	2897
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2856	24	15/24	62.5 %	+11/=8/−5	2945
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	19	11/19	57.9 %	+7/=8/−4	2904
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	2898

Meilleur : 69 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2876 · 175 parties · 50.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2876± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+0/=7/−10	2804
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	16	6/16	37.5 %	+2/=8/−6	2912
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2822
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	17	8/17	47.1 %	+4/=8/−5	2900
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2856	25	12/25	48.0 %	+8/=8/−9	2842
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	27	17/27	63.0 %	+13/=8/−6	2941
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2971
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	27	17/27	63.0 %	+12/=10/−5	2847
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	2894

Meilleur : 72 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 10 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2856 · 74 parties · 46.6 % · err ±23

Cote Ordo2856± 23

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	24	9/24	37.5 %	+5/=8/−11	2831
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	25	13/25	52.0 %	+9/=8/−8	2890
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2848

Meilleur : 52 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 · plus dur : 38 % vs Loop M1-T 4CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2848 · 254 parties · 55.5 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2848± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+1/=7/−11	2797
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	2863
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	19	8/19	42.1 %	+4/=8/−7	2865
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	27	10/27	37.0 %	+6/=8/−13	2784
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2856	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2856
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	34	21/34	61.8 %	+12/=18/−4	2839
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2729	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	2888
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	2916
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2826
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	35	24.5/35	70.0 %	+19/=11/−5	2864
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2752
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	21	16.5/21	78.6 %	+13/=7/−1	2894

Meilleur : 79 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 24 % vs Gull 1.2 x64.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2796 · 60 parties · 56.7 % · err ±26

Cote Ordo2796± 26

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2660
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	15	10/15	66.7 %	+7/=6/−2	2876
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+6/=7/−2	2834
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2812

Meilleur : 67 % vs ProDeo 2.0 · plus dur : 33 % vs Deep Junior 7.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2787 · 90 parties · 62.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2787± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	15	8/15	53.3 %	+4/=8/−3	2774
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2716
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	2838
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2816
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	15	9/15	60.0 %	+7/=4/−4	2736
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	15	12/15	80.0 %	+9/=6/−0	2850

Meilleur : 80 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 47 % vs Junior 8.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2780 · 169 parties · 58.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2780± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2686
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	2916
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2780
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2739
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2729	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2704
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2764
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2789
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+9/=1/−5	2812
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2698
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2682
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	2837
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2768
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2845

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 46 % vs Deep Fritz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2770 · 90 parties · 60.6 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2770± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2809
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2766
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	2799
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+7/=3/−3	2809
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2878
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2748
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2583

Meilleur : 77 % vs SOS 5 for Arena · plus dur : 46 % vs Nimzo 8.

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2755 · 219 parties · 44.1 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2755± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2721
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	4/20	20.0 %	+2/=4/−14	2749
Loop M1-T 4CPU — 1 Thread	2920	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2777
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	27	10/27	37.0 %	+5/=10/−12	2784
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	34	13/34	38.2 %	+4/=18/−12	2765
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5/15	33.3 %	+2/=6/−7	2675
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2755
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2729	14	8/14	57.1 %	+7/=2/−5	2779
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2754
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	2838
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2717
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+6/=3/−4	2722
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+6/=3/−4	2720
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2736

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 · plus dur : 20 % vs Glaurung 2.2 JA 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2750 · 103 parties · 56.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2750± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	7/15	46.7 %	+3/=8/−4	2763
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2711
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2729	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+3/=7/−4	2704
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2787
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	13	8/13	61.5 %	+5/=6/−2	2750
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2786
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+7/=5/−1	2828
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2668

Meilleur : 73 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 42 % vs Fritz 7.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2739 · 138 parties · 55.1 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2739± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+2/=7/−6	2701
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	2810
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2780
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2743
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2797
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2669
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3004
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	28	15/28	53.6 %	+10/=10/−8	2679
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2730
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2718
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2666

Meilleur : 54 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Shredder 6.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2729 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo2729± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2689
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2805
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	14	6/14	42.9 %	+5/=2/−7	2705
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+4/=7/−3	2775
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	14	6/14	42.9 %	+3/=6/−5	2667

Meilleur : 54 % vs Deep Junior 7 · plus dur : 29 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads

Cote Ordo 2725 · 118 parties · 50.0 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2725± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3000	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2200
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2876	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	2708
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2658
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2741
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2659
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1869
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2745
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2775
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	9	7/9	77.8 %	+6/=2/−1	2827
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	9	7/9	77.8 %	+7/=0/−2	2815
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2888
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2675

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2719 · 121 parties · 51.2 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2719± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2741
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2710
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2720
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2661
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2670
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2698
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2752
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2739
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2666
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	29	19/29	65.5 %	+15/=8/−6	2766

Meilleur : 66 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 35 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2717 · 186 parties · 45.2 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2717± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	35	10.5/35	30.0 %	+5/=11/−19	2701
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2701
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	2666
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+5/=1/−9	2685
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	2688
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2635
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2729	14	8/14	57.1 %	+5/=6/−3	2779
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2766
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2777
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	34	21.5/34	63.2 %	+14/=15/−5	2748

Meilleur : 63 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 30 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2698 · 189 parties · 56.1 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2698± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2780
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+3/=3/−7	2659
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2662
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2764
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2719
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	9	6/9	66.7 %	+6/=0/−3	2789
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2703
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2615
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	24	14/24	58.3 %	+13/=2/−9	2668
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	23	14/23	60.9 %	+10/=8/−5	2674
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	29	21.5/29	74.1 %	+19/=5/−5	2770
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	20	11/20	55.0 %	+10/=2/−8	2603

Meilleur : 74 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 35 % vs Fritz 7.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2682 · 85 parties · 44.1 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo2682± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2778
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2780
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2720
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2648
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2622
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2598
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2631
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2725

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fritz 6 · plus dur : 37 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0.

↑ retour au classement

SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2669 · 193 parties · 41.5 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2669± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2848	21	4.5/21	21.4 %	+1/=7/−13	2623
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2639
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2612
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2561
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+4/=3/−6	2701
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	13	5/13	38.5 %	+2/=6/−5	2669
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2739
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3525
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2648
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	9	3/9	33.3 %	+3/=0/−6	2578
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2752
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+8/=7/−5	2719
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	39	22/39	56.4 %	+12/=20/−7	2699

Meilleur : 60 % vs Gandalf 6.01 · plus dur : 21 % vs Shredder 10 UCI.

↑ retour au classement

List 512 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2666 · 212 parties · 45.0 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2666± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	6/15	40.0 %	+4/=4/−7	2716
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2678
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2688
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+4/=3/−6	2701
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2630
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2401
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2647
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2719
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2661
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2717
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+5/=7/−8	2616
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	29	12.5/29	43.1 %	+7/=11/−11	2606
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2757
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2705
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2695
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2603

Meilleur : 70 % vs Nimzo 8 · plus dur : 33 % vs Hiarcs 8.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2654 · 368 parties · 48.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2654± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2780	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2589
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2755	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2674
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+1/=5/−7	2577
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	28	13/28	46.4 %	+8/=10/−10	2714
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2605
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2719	29	10/29	34.5 %	+6/=8/−15	2607
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2717	34	12.5/34	36.8 %	+5/=15/−14	2623
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2737
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2682	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2611
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2669	39	17/39	43.6 %	+7/=20/−12	2624
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	29	16.5/29	56.9 %	+11/=11/−7	2714
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	34	22.5/34	66.2 %	+15/=15/−4	2726
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	33	18/33	54.5 %	+13/=10/−10	2629
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	53	30.5/53	57.5 %	+17/=27/−9	2640
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	21	14/21	66.7 %	+12/=4/−5	2688

Meilleur : 67 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 25 % vs Deep Junior 7.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2610 · 171 parties · 40.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2610± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2787	15	3/15	20.0 %	+0/=6/−9	2546
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2770	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2796
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2750	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2692
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2619
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	2/9	22.2 %	+1/=2/−6	2508
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	24	10/24	41.7 %	+9/=2/−13	2640
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2519
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	34	11.5/34	33.8 %	+4/=15/−15	2538
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2644
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	15	6/15	40.0 %	+3/=6/−6	2517
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2715

Meilleur : 70 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 20 % vs Fritz 8.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2597 · 126 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2597± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2619
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	2/9	22.2 %	+2/=0/−7	2508
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	23	9/23	39.1 %	+5/=8/−10	2621
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2558
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	33	15/33	45.5 %	+10/=10/−13	2622
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2563
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2587
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+4/=7/−2	2622

Meilleur : 58 % vs Yace Paderborn · plus dur : 35 % vs List 512.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2587 · 195 parties · 46.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2587± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2739	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2661
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2424
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	29	7.5/29	25.9 %	+5/=5/−19	2515
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2558
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	53	22.5/53	42.5 %	+9/=27/−17	2601
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	15	9/15	60.0 %	+6/=6/−3	2680
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2597
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2568	21	11.5/21	54.8 %	+9/=5/−7	2601
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2432	34	24/34	70.6 %	+20/=8/−6	2584

Meilleur : 71 % vs Rebel 6.0 · plus dur : 15 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 8CPU.

↑ retour au classement

Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2568 · 110 parties · 39.5 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2568± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2618
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2698	20	9/20	45.0 %	+8/=2/−10	2663
List 512 — 1 Thread	2666	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2631
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2654	21	7/21	33.3 %	+5/=4/−12	2534
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2610	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2462
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2597	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+2/=7/−4	2544
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	21	9.5/21	45.2 %	+7/=5/−9	2554

Meilleur : 45 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 30 % vs Nimzo 8.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread

Cote Ordo 2432 · 34 parties · 29.4 % · err ±31

Cote Ordo2432± 31

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2587	34	10/34	29.4 %	+6/=8/−20	2435

Meilleur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32 · plus dur : 29 % vs Fritz 5.32.

↑ retour au classement

Post Views: 480