Performance elo, tournois maison

Classement général · échelle Ordo

Performance Elo — tournois maison

Cotes Ordo (fit global) depuis le PGN du laboratoire : toutes, sans exception, issues de parties jouées. Les moteurs en bleu tournent sous adaptateur Python (ponts eng2uci / shredder2uci) : leur cote est celle de la version adaptée, jamais celle du moteur d'origine. Les machines dédiées sont en vert, en italique lorsqu'elles sont pilotées en UCI et tournent sans bridage. Les portages maison sur machine émulée par MAME sont en violet. Les programmes PC d'époque tournant sur un 486 ou un Pentium émulé sont en brun : ni moteurs UCI natifs, ni machines dédiées, ni créations maison. Cliquer un moteur ✱ fait défiler vers son débrief.

Rang	Moteur / Système	Hardware	Elo	Parties	Err ±
1	✱ Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3709	120	±18
2	✱ Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3694	191	±14
3	✱ Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3688	191	±14
4	✱ Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3679	241	±13
5	✱ Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3667	151	±16
6	✱ Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3656	251	±13
7	✱ Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3656	100	±20
8	✱ Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3636	274	±12
9	✱ Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3636	110	±19
10	✱ Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3598	147	±16
11	✱ Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3557	206	±14
12	✱ Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3554	371	±10
13	✱ Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3528	198	±14
14	✱ Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3513	215	±14
15	✱ Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3511	112	±19
16	✱ Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3494	185	±15
17	✱ Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3481	160	±16
18	✱ Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3481	89	±21
19	✱ Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3456	159	±16
20	✱ Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3453	180	±15
21	✱ Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3453	168	±15
22	✱ Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3449	372	±10
23	✱ Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3444	70	±24
24	✱ rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3413	179	±15
25	✱ Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3394	412	±10
26	✱ Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3377	180	±14
27	✱ Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3343	154	±16
28	✱ Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3337	180	±14
29	✱ Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3326	176	±15
30	✱ Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3287	146	±15
31	✱ Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3287	128	±11
32	✱ Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3270	163	±16
33	✱ Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3264	199	±14
34	✱ Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3211	80	±22
35	✱ Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3184	101	±20
36	✱ Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3177	126	±17
37	✱ Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3176	128	±18
38	✱ Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3171	288	±12
39	✱ Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3097	127	±16
40	✱ Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3043	118	±18
41	✱ Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3038	179	±15
42	✱ Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3032	79	±22
43	✱ Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2990	192	±14
44	✱ Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2987	456	±9
45	✱ DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2959	127	±18
46	✱ Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2951	90	±21
47	✱ Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2931	361	±10
48	✱ Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2930	163	±16
49	✱ Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2913	128	±18
50	✱ The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2912	128	±17
51	✱ Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2886	128	±18
52	✱ Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2885	186	±13
53	✱ HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2882	368	±10
54	✱ Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2880	711	±7
55	✱ Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2876	127	±18
56	✱ Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2874	128	±17
57	✱ Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2874	128	±17
58	✱ ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2861	127	±17
59	✱ Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2857	74	±23
60	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2843	99	±20
61	✱ Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2840	934	±6
62	✱ Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2834	97	±19
63	✱ Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2834	214	±13
64	✱ Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2827	498	±9
65	✱ Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2826	90	±21
66	✱ Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2796	60	±26
67	✱ ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2787	913	±7
68	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2785	96	±20
69	✱ Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2778	169	±15
70	✱ Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2775	107	±19
71	✱ Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2771	98	±20
72	✱ Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2769	177	±15
73	✱ Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2763	290	±12
74	✱ Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2761	389	±10
75	✱ Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2756	90	±21
76	✱ Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2751	521	±9
77	✱ Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2738	225	±13
78	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2737	100	±19
79	✱ The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2734	424	±10
80	✱ Junior 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2732	406	±10
81	✱ Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2730	720	±7
82	✱ Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2725	118	±18
83	✱ Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2724	102	±20
84	✱ Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2723	132	±17
85	✱ Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2719	70	±24
86	✱ Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2716	234	±13
87	✱ Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2716	121	±18
88	✱ THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2715	214	±14
89	✱ Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2715	193	±14
90	✱ Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2707	310	±11
91	✱ THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2702	227	±13
92	✱ Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2700	551	±8
93	✱ Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	2700	338	±11
94	✱ Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2699	304	±11
95	✱ Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2698	224	±13
96	✱ Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2696	189	±14
97	✱ Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	Apple Silicon M1 Max	2694	686	±8
98	✱ Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2680	85	±22
99	✱ SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2675	676	±8
100	✱ Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2662	200	±14
101	✱ Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2659	194	±14
102	✱ List 512 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2656	538	±9
103	✱ Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2653	368	±10
104	✱ Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2653	285	±12
105	✱ Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2646	116	±18
106	✱ Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2638	235	±13
107	✱ Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2630	212	±14
108	✱ WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2627	167	±14
109	✱ Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2604	171	±15
110	✱ Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2603	195	±14
111	✱ Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2598	126	±18
112	✱ Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2587	450	±9
113	✱ Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	68040 40 MHz — MAME	2548	406	±9
114	✱ Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2535	490	±9
115	✱ Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2521	150	±16
116	✱ Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2521	150	±16
117	✱ CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2517	105	±16
118	✱ Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2491	153	±16
119	✱ Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2486	150	±16
120	✱ Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHzturbo	ARM2 400 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2378	235	±13
121	✱ Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2366	150	±16
122	✱ Mephisto Genius 68030 London	68EC030 33,3 MHz — cb-emu	2363	763	±7
123	✱ Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME	2358	371	±10
124	✱ Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2339	150	±16
125	✱ MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2338	150	±16
126	✱ Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2335	150	±16
127	✱ Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	68EC020 24,6 MHz — cb-emu	2315	760	±7
128	✱ Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2306	290	±12
129	✱ Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2306	150	±16
130	✱ MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2284	157	±15
131	✱ Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	2265	177	±15
132	✱ MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2256	150	±16
133	✱ Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2234	276	±12
134	✱ Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	68040 40 MHz — MAME	2228	329	±11
135	✱ Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	H8S/2312 25 MHz — cb-emu	2226	379	±9
136	✱ Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2224	238	±10
137	✱ Mephisto RISC II	65SC02 2,5 MHz + ARM2 ChessMachine — cb-emu	2218	637	±8
138	✱ MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2188	288	±12
139	✱ Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2171	181	±15
140	✱ Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	ARM2 14,2 MHz — cb-emu	2171	561	±8
141	✱ Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2163	150	±16
142	✱ Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	SPARClite (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu	2160	492	±8
143	✱ Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	286 1800 MHz — PC émulé	2144	173	±15
144	✱ Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	68030 32 MHz — cb-emu	2125	498	±9
145	✱ Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	68000 12,3 MHz — cb-emu	2115	497	±9
146	✱ Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2115	150	±16
147	✱ Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2098	263	±11
148	✱ Novag Sapphire	Clipper C400 12,5 MHz — cb-emu	2097	480	±9
149	✱ Fidelity Designer Mach IV	68EC020 20 MHz — cb-emu	2090	494	±9
150	✱ Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHzturbo	65C02 73 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2088	257	±12
151	✱ Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHzturbo	65C02 91 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2054	262	±12
152	✱ Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME	2039	179	±14
153	✱ Fidelity Designer Mach III	68000 16 MHz — cb-emu	2029	457	±9
154	✱ Novag Zircon II	H8/325 26,6 MHz — cb-emu	1963	430	±10
155	✱ Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	68000 12 MHz — cb-emu	1961	441	±10
156	✱ Mephisto Nigel Short	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1956	379	±10
157	✱ Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	286 16 MHz — PC émulé	1922	283	±12
158	✱ Saitek President	6502 2 MHz — cb-emu	1918	374	±10
159	✱ Saitek Maestro D++	65C02 (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu	1911	380	±10
160	✱ Novag Super Expert C v3.6	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1884	380	±10
161	✱ Novag Super Forte C v3.6	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1882	379	±10
162	✱ Novag Turquoise	65C02 (à confirmer) — cb-emu	1859	344	±11
163	✱ Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1856	390	±10
164	✱ Mephisto Modena (set 3)	65C02 4,2 MHz — cb-emu	1837	391	±10
165	✱ Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1832	390	±10
166	✱ Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1817	388	±10
167	✱ Novag Constellation Forte A	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1803	380	±10
168	✱ Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1801	389	±10
169	✱ Fidelity Designer 2100	65C02 6 MHz — cb-emu	1792	388	±10
170	✱ Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1756	389	±9
171	✱ Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1738	367	±10
172	✱ Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHzturbo	HD6301Y0 125 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	1724	150	±16
173	✱ Saitek Prisma	H8/325 20 MHz — cb-emu	1724	369	±10
174	✱ Fidelity Designer 2000	65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu	1688	368	±9
175	✱ Novag Super VIP v3.7	HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu	1640	358	±9
176	✱ Tandy Chess Champion 2150	65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu	1577	356	±8
177	✱ Saitek Turbo 16K	HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu	1437	358	±6
178	✱ Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	HD6303Y 12 MHz — cb-emu	1285	357	±4

✱ = débrief cliquable · bleu = sous adaptateur Python (18) · vert = machine dédiée sous cb-emu (38) · vert italique = échiquier dédié piloté en UCI, sans bridage (2) · violet = portage maison sur machine émulée MAME (6) · brun = programme PC d'époque sur 486 / Pentium émulé (19) · 178 moteurs au total

Débriefs · adversaire par adversaire

Débrief de chaque gauntlet

Perf locale = cote Ordo de l'adversaire + 400·log₁₀(p/(1−p)). Sa dispersion reflète la transitivité du moteur. Mêmes couleurs qu'au classement : bleu pour les moteurs sous adaptateur Python, vert pour les machines dédiées, violet pour les portages maison, brun pour les programmes PC d'époque sur 486 / Pentium émulé.

Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3709 · 120 parties · 57.1 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3709± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3694
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3688
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3714
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3709
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3783
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3669

Meilleur : 70 % vs Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3694 · 191 parties · 57.6 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3694± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3709
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3688
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3696
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3667
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3674
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3744
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	8/15	53.3 %	+1/=14/−0	3659
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3735
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3726
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3643

Meilleur : 72 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3688 · 191 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3688± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3709
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3694
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3679
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3667
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3691
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3725
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3706
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3711
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3684
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3624

Meilleur : 68 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 20 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3679 · 241 parties · 57.9 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3679± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3674
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3676
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3688
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3667
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3674
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3656	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3673
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3707
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+2/=13/−0	3682
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3711
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3652
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3701
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3584
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3701
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3688

Meilleur : 77 % vs Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3667 · 151 parties · 54.6 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3667± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3694
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3688
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3679
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3656
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3636
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	9/16	56.2 %	+2/=14/−0	3642
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3705
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3624

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3656 · 251 parties · 55.0 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3656± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3656
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3676
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3653
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3662
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3667
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3656	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3621
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3671
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3636
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+1/=15/−0	3620
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3607
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3617
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3754
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3709

Meilleur : 80 % vs Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 42 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3656 · 100 parties · 55.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3656± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3662
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3691
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3689
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3646
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3589

Meilleur : 62 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 48 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3636 · 274 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3636± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3586
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3600
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3609
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3621
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3656	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3603
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3662
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	19	13/19	68.4 %	+7/=12/−0	3663
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3621
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3600
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3690
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3654
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3776
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3618
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3719

Meilleur : 90 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 35 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3636 · 110 parties · 45.0 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3636± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3562
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	15	7/15	46.7 %	+0/=14/−1	3670
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3618
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+0/=13/−2	3632
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3667
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3656
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3669

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3598 · 147 parties · 42.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3598± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3709	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3638
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3557
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3576
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3567
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	16	7/16	43.8 %	+0/=14/−2	3623
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+0/=15/−1	3634
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3636	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3565
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+1/=13/−2	3536
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3691

Meilleur : 69 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 31 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3557 · 206 parties · 46.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3557± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3525
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3561
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3584
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3520
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3656	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3567
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+2/=13/−1	3620
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3583
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	13	7/13	53.8 %	+1/=12/−0	3538
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	15	8/15	53.3 %	+2/=12/−1	3518
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3576
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	3576
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3544
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+3/=7/−0	3552

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 28 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3554 · 371 parties · 52.2 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3554± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3694	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3605
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3688	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3618
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3532
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3667	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3597
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3604
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3656	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3621
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3529
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3598	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3461
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3528
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3636
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3479
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	12	7/12	58.3 %	+2/=10/−0	3570
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3494
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3481
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3542
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	32	20/32	62.5 %	+9/=22/−1	3538
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3540
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3541
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3524
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+12/=7/−1	3552

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3528 · 198 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3528± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3567
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	19	6/19	31.6 %	+0/=12/−7	3502
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3446
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3531
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3506
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3576
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+8/=11/−0	3569
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3502
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3504
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3606

Meilleur : 82 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3513 · 215 parties · 52.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3513± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3609
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3415
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3529
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3589
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3511
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3506
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3519
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3448
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3524
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3552

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3511 · 112 parties · 53.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3511± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	13	6/13	46.2 %	+0/=12/−1	3531
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	12	5/12	41.7 %	+0/=10/−2	3496
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	3521
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+4/=9/−0	3592
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3481
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+0/=11/−1	3426
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	12	8/12	66.7 %	+4/=8/−0	3574
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3478
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3515

Meilleur : 67 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 42 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3494 · 185 parties · 48.4 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3494± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3472
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3656	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3441
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	15	7/15	46.7 %	+1/=12/−2	3534
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3554
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	3484
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3534
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3473
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3470
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3502
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3515
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3483

Meilleur : 62 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 22 % vs Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3481 · 160 parties · 47.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3481± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3679	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3472
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3462
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3554
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+0/=9/−4	3401
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3442
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3481
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3490
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3506
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3519
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3479

Meilleur : 60 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 23 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3481 · 89 parties · 53.4 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo3481± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3511
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3481
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	15	8/15	53.3 %	+1/=14/−0	3479
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3548
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+0/=13/−1	3424
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+3/=11/−1	3441

Meilleur : 63 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 46 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3456 · 159 parties · 50.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3456± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	3437
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+1/=11/−0	3540
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3477
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3447
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	15	7/15	46.7 %	+0/=14/−1	3458
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3371
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3449
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3515
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	14	8/14	57.1 %	+3/=10/−1	3444
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	13	9/13	69.2 %	+5/=8/−0	3484
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	13	8/13	61.5 %	+3/=10/−0	3408

Meilleur : 69 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 33 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3453 · 180 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3453± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3489
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3465
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3476
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3461
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3432
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	12/20	60.0 %	+5/=14/−1	3484
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3464
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+5/=11/−4	3394
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3426

Meilleur : 62 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3453 · 168 parties · 53.0 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3453± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	12	4/12	33.3 %	+0/=8/−4	3391
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3477
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3429
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3386
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3537
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+1/=15/−2	3430
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3410
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3584
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3495

Meilleur : 80 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 33 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3449 · 372 parties · 48.7 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3449± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3395
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	3462
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	32	12/32	37.5 %	+1/=22/−9	3465
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3401
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3443
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3482
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3442
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3411
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+1/=13/−0	3506
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3456
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+2/=15/−1	3472
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3470
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3444	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3410
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3396
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	39	22.5/39	57.7 %	+7/=31/−1	3448
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3448
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	19	14/19	73.7 %	+11/=6/−2	3522
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3426
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+9/=9/−1	3482

Meilleur : 74 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3444 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo3444± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3557	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+0/=7/−3	3450
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3511	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3441
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3424
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3481	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3447
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3385
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3488
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3484

Meilleur : 55 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 35 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3413 · 179 parties · 42.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3413± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3395
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3427
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+0/=11/−8	3372
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3479
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	8/20	40.0 %	+1/=14/−5	3383
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3466
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3394
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	11/20	55.0 %	+5/=12/−3	3412
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3390

Meilleur : 57 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3394 · 412 parties · 51.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3394± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3255
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3407
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3421
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3443
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3494	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3406
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3481	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+1/=11/−3	3434
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	14	6/14	42.9 %	+1/=10/−3	3406
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3383
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3453
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	39	16.5/39	42.3 %	+1/=31/−7	3395
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3413
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3448
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	25	13.5/25	54.0 %	+5/=17/−3	3371
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3372
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	20	12/20	60.0 %	+6/=12/−2	3397
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	3397
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3391
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3454
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+10/=9/−0	3380
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3553

Meilleur : 90 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3377 · 180 parties · 37.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3377± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3395
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3407
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3401
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3366
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+4/=11/−5	3436
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3379
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	9/20	45.0 %	+3/=12/−5	3378
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3324
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3337	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3337

Meilleur : 50 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3343 · 154 parties · 47.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3343± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	13	4/13	30.8 %	+0/=8/−5	3315
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3212
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	19	5/19	26.3 %	+2/=6/−11	3270
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	25	11.5/25	46.0 %	+3/=17/−5	3366
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	26	13.5/26	51.9 %	+5/=17/−4	3339
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	26	18/26	69.2 %	+11/=14/−1	3411
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	25	17.5/25	70.0 %	+11/=13/−1	3411

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3337 · 180 parties · 31.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3337± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3636	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3255
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3554	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+1/=7/−12	3339
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3528	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3259
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3513	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3299
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3453	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3364
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3360
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3413	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3361
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3359
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3377	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3377

Meilleur : 50 % vs Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3326 · 176 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3326± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3456	13	5/13	38.5 %	+0/=10/−3	3374
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3453	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3285
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3449	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+1/=9/−9	3293
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	8/20	40.0 %	+2/=12/−6	3324
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	26	12.5/26	48.1 %	+4/=17/−5	3330
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+6/=11/−1	3386
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3323
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	20	11/20	55.0 %	+6/=10/−4	3299
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	3346

Meilleur : 72 % vs Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 28 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3287 · 146 parties · 67.8 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3287± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+1/=11/−6	3227
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+5/=9/−6	3253
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+2/=13/−3	3245
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+6/=11/−1	3276
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	18	13.5/18	75.0 %	+9/=9/−0	3362
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	18	16/18	88.9 %	+14/=4/−0	3399
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	18	16.5/18	91.7 %	+15/=3/−0	3328
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	18	17/18	94.4 %	+16/=2/−0	3332

Meilleur : 94 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread · plus dur : 36 % vs Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3287 · 128 parties · 87.5 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3287± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3308
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3234
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3234
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3242
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3214
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3401
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3713
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3357
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3220
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3218
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3347
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3345
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3212
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3199
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3640
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3534
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3427

↑ retour au classement

Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3270 · 163 parties · 51.5 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3270± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	26	8/26	30.8 %	+1/=14/−11	3202
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3274
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+6/=9/−5	3304
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+1/=9/−3	3210
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	3243
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3259
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	3385
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	13	9/13	69.2 %	+6/=6/−1	3312
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	13	11/13	84.6 %	+9/=4/−0	3334

Meilleur : 85 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 31 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3264 · 199 parties · 51.3 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3264± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3267
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3343	25	7.5/25	30.0 %	+1/=13/−11	3196
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	20	9/20	45.0 %	+4/=10/−6	3291
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+3/=13/−2	3306
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+3/=9/−1	3324
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3211	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3228
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	3263
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+10/=17/−3	3260
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	29	17/29	58.6 %	+7/=20/−2	3236
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3318

Meilleur : 70 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 30 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3211 · 80 parties · 56.2 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3211± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3247
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3237
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3171
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3185

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 48 % vs Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3184 · 101 parties · 44.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3184± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3125
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	3212
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	3185
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3211	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3158
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3177
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3246
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	3241
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3185

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 18 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3177 · 126 parties · 36.5 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3177± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+0/=9/−10	3191
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3326	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	3158
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+1/=11/−6	3188
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3188
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+3/=17/−10	3181
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3184
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3171

Meilleur : 50 % vs Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 24 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3176 · 128 parties · 57.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3176± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	3061
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	29	12/29	41.4 %	+2/=20/−7	3203
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3114
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3171
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+9/=5/−1	3245
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3197
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	15	12.5/15	83.3 %	+10/=5/−0	3267
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	15	11/15	73.3 %	+8/=6/−1	3106

Meilleur : 83 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 23 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3171 · 288 parties · 60.2 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3171± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3394	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3012
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	4.5/18	25.0 %	+0/=9/−9	3096
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3150
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	13	4/13	30.8 %	+1/=6/−6	3129
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3264	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3117
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3211	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3211
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	3114
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3177	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3177
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3176
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3234
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3043
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	16	13/16	81.2 %	+11/=4/−1	3293
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	16	12.5/16	78.1 %	+11/=3/−2	3211
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3242
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3297
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3401
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3251
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3077
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3073
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3135
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3676
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3345
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3212
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3115
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3178
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3534
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3427

Meilleur : 81 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 10 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3097 · 127 parties · 70.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3097± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3150
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3034
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3180
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	3076
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3048
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3269
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3050
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3077
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3352
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3017
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3131
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3129
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3011
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3052
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3178
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2925
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3427

↑ retour au classement

Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3043 · 118 parties · 63.6 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3043± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	3096
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3171
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2960
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2987
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	3062
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2989
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3251
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2886
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3019
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3071
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2978
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	3011
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3129
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2963
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3120
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3534
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3098

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3038 · 179 parties · 42.7 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3038± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	2/18	11.1 %	+0/=4/−14	2926
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3270	13	2/13	15.4 %	+0/=4/−9	2974
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3211	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3064
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3184	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3037
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+1/=5/−9	2969
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	16	3/16	18.8 %	+1/=4/−11	2916
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3032	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3049
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	17	10.5/17	61.8 %	+6/=9/−2	3073
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	16	9/16	56.2 %	+4/=10/−2	3031
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+11/=5/−1	3165
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+10/=7/−0	3115

Meilleur : 79 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 11 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3032 · 79 parties · 56.3 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3032± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3021
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+9/=5/−6	3043
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3095
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+5/=11/−3	2967

Meilleur : 65 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 48 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2990 · 192 parties · 50.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2990± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	2969
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	16	3.5/16	21.9 %	+2/=3/−11	2950
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	6.5/17	38.2 %	+2/=9/−6	2955
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3032	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+6/=5/−9	2979
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2964
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	2951	30	15/30	50.0 %	+7/=16/−7	2951
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2930
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	3048
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	2967
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	20	16/20	80.0 %	+14/=4/−2	3028

Meilleur : 80 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 22 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2987 · 456 parties · 60.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2987± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	3032
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	15	2.5/15	16.7 %	+0/=5/−10	2896
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2916
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	3008
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	3043
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	16	7/16	43.8 %	+2/=10/−4	2994
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3032	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	2924
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	3013
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3096
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	2951	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+11/=15/−4	3034
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	48	26.5/48	55.2 %	+16/=21/−11	2967
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3025
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3002
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3023
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	48	29/48	60.4 %	+20/=18/−10	2955
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	24	15/24	62.5 %	+9/=12/−3	2969
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3013
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2918
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	4/8	50.0 %	+0/=8/−0	2874
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3199
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2843	20	12/20	60.0 %	+7/=10/−3	2914
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	23	18/23	78.3 %	+14/=8/−1	3063
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2826	18	14/18	77.8 %	+11/=6/−1	3043
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3067
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2785	20	13/20	65.0 %	+12/=2/−6	2892
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2771	19	16/19	84.2 %	+14/=4/−1	3062
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2737	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3006
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2823
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3525
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3427

Meilleur : 84 % vs Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads · plus dur : 17 % vs Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2959 · 127 parties · 53.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2959± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	3032
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2833
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	3008
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2941
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2850
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3122
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3050
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3023
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2925
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3071
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3131
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2963
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2786
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2904
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2751
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2925
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2882

↑ retour au classement

Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2951 · 90 parties · 51.7 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2951± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	30	15/30	50.0 %	+7/=16/−7	2990
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+4/=15/−11	2905
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	30	20/30	66.7 %	+14/=12/−4	2960

Meilleur : 67 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2931 · 361 parties · 56.1 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2931± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2816
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2701
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2759
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2985
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	48	21.5/48	44.8 %	+11/=21/−16	2951
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2769
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2913
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3023
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	48	26/48	54.2 %	+15/=22/−11	2911
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	46	28/46	60.9 %	+15/=26/−5	2957
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2876
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2963
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2831
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2904
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	44	32/44	72.7 %	+23/=18/−3	3010
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	39	23.5/39	60.3 %	+17/=13/−9	2899
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	38	28/38	73.7 %	+22/=12/−4	2930
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2925
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3098

Meilleur : 74 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Loop M1-T — 4 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2930 · 163 parties · 48.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2930± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3176	15	4/15	26.7 %	+1/=6/−8	3000
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+1/=5/−11	2803
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3032	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+3/=11/−5	2995
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	2990
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	2892
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	17	9/17	52.9 %	+5/=8/−4	2900
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2857	24	15/24	62.5 %	+11/=8/−5	2946
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	19	11/19	57.9 %	+7/=8/−4	2895
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	2930

Meilleur : 69 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2913 · 128 parties · 47.3 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2913± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2487
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2833
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2960
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2705
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2899
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2822
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2931
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	2975
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3137
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2969
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3067
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2831
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2918
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	2949
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2751
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2823
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2965

↑ retour au classement

The King 3.50 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2912 · 128 parties · 64.8 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2912± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	1.5/18	8.3 %	+0/=3/−15	2870
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2694
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2880
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	5	3/5	60.0 %	+3/=0/−2	2910
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	6	3/6	50.0 %	+0/=6/−0	2834
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2916
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3169
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3040
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3132
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2929
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3116
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3061
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	2837
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2995
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2835
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3507
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2702
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2837
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3080
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	2795
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2942
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2994
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3453
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+3/=1/−1	2785
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3004
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2873

Meilleur : 8 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 8 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2886 · 128 parties · 43.8 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2886± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2816
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2980
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2906
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3043
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2850
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2822
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2794
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2824
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2793
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2924
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2788
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2874
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	3011
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2949
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2840
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2925
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2965

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2885 · 186 parties · 71.5 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2885± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3102
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2760
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2840
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3114
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2763
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2947
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3067
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2648
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2804
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3089
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2964
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2960
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2819
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	2906
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3026
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3089
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2862
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2870
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2768
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2777
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	7/8	87.5 %	+7/=0/−1	3000
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3453
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2735
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2893
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2724
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2873

Meilleur : 73 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 73 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2882 · 368 parties · 48.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2882± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2949
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2980
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2627
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2906
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	48	19/48	39.6 %	+10/=18/−20	2914
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2916
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	48	22/48	45.8 %	+11/=22/−15	2902
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2658
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2975
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	48	24/48	50.0 %	+16/=16/−16	2880
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2965
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2963
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2786
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2772
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	44	26.5/44	60.2 %	+17/=19/−8	2912
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	40	20.5/40	51.2 %	+13/=15/−12	2835
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	40	24.5/40	61.3 %	+15/=19/−6	2830
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3072
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3098

Meilleur : 61 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2880 · 711 parties · 57.1 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2880± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2949
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2916
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2960
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2852
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3038	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+0/=7/−10	2803
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2822
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	24	9/24	37.5 %	+3/=12/−9	2899
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2769
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	46	18/46	39.1 %	+5/=26/−15	2854
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	17	8/17	47.1 %	+4/=8/−5	2910
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2824
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2912
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2843
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	3006
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	48	24/48	50.0 %	+16/=16/−16	2882
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2920
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2831
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2918
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+1/=7/−0	2904
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2857	25	12/25	48.0 %	+8/=8/−9	2843
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2843	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2880
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	38	22.5/38	59.2 %	+15/=15/−8	2905
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3634
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2834
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	24	15/24	62.5 %	+10/=10/−4	2916
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2826	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+5/=7/−4	2847
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	36	21.5/36	59.7 %	+14/=15/−7	2855
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2785	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+11/=5/−4	2912
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2969
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2966
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2771	20	14/20	70.0 %	+12/=4/−4	2918
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2994
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2863
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	2888
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2773
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2737	20	13/20	65.0 %	+8/=10/−2	2845
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	3045
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	2893
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2915
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2914
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+5/=5/−0	2907
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2750
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2970
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	2987
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+7/=1/−1	2982
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2932
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2742
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2777
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2847
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2755
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3446
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3438
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3430
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2882
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3387
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2917

Meilleur : 90 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2876 · 127 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2876± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2816
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2371
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2842
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2941
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2850
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2705
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2931
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2722
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2975
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2793
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2836
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3129
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2963
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2817
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3031
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3072
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2882

↑ retour au classement

Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2874 · 128 parties · 42.2 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2874± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2816
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2701
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2960
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2906
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2944
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2871
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2842
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2957
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2749
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2971
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2924
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2622
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2918
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2904
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2840
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2925
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2882

↑ retour au classement

Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2874 · 128 parties · 42.2 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2874± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2949
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2833
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2842
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2788
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	4/8	50.0 %	+0/=8/−0	2987
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	3048
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2975
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2869
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2886
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2793
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2836
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2788
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2831
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2904
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2649
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2823
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2965

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2861 · 127 parties · 40.6 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2861± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2949
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2916
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2906
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2941
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2649
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2916
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2887
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2824
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2798
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2971
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+0/=7/−1	2836
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2920
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2831
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2831
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2751
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2823
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2882

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 10 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2857 · 74 parties · 46.6 % · err ±23

Cote Ordo2857± 23

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	24	9/24	37.5 %	+5/=8/−11	2841
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	25	13/25	52.0 %	+9/=8/−8	2894
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2840

Meilleur : 52 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Loop M1-T — 4 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2843 · 99 parties · 49.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2843± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	20	8/20	40.0 %	+3/=10/−7	2917
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2843
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+6/=9/−5	2857
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2787
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	20	12/20	60.0 %	+8/=8/−4	2821

Meilleur : 60 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2840 · 934 parties · 55.9 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo2840± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3287	18	1/18	5.6 %	+0/=2/−16	2795
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2487
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2833
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2759
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2764
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	2863
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	23	5/23	21.7 %	+1/=8/−14	2765
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	3048
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	2951	30	10/30	33.3 %	+4/=12/−14	2831
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	44	12/44	27.3 %	+3/=18/−23	2761
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	19	8/19	42.1 %	+4/=8/−7	2875
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	3002
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	2/5	40.0 %	+2/=0/−3	2841
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2886
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2885
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	44	17.5/44	39.8 %	+8/=19/−17	2810
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	38	15.5/38	40.8 %	+8/=15/−15	2815
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2685
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3065
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2874
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2949
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2857	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2857
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2843	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+5/=9/−6	2826
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2954
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	2923
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	22	11.5/22	52.3 %	+10/=3/−9	2843
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2826	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+7/=5/−6	2845
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	43	25.5/43	59.3 %	+15/=21/−7	2852
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2785	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	2976
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2834
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2771	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+8/=7/−5	2824
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2871
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2871
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2777
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2737	20	13/20	65.0 %	+9/=8/−3	2845
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2866
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	2958
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	60	39.5/60	65.8 %	+30/=19/−11	2843
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	2916
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2844
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2532
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2719	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	2878
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2837
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2824
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3053
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2804
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	27	17/27	63.0 %	+13/=8/−6	2799
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3173
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	45	30/45	66.7 %	+23/=14/−8	2820
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	2889
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	56	38/56	67.9 %	+24/=28/−4	2824
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2750
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	30	22.5/30	75.0 %	+17/=11/−2	2866
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3079
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2465
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3123
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3446
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	2917
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3430
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2965
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2724
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2643

Meilleur : 79 % vs Junior 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 6 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2834 · 97 parties · 66.5 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2834± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2606
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2080
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2720
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2643
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3018
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2978
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3030
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3534
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3055
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2715
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2994
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3045
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2893
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3500
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2698
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2837
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2976
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2867
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2873

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2834 · 214 parties · 64.5 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2834± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	6	3/6	50.0 %	+0/=6/−0	2912
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2956
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2880
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2751
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3025
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3053
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2667
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	3/6	50.0 %	+2/=2/−2	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3561
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2839
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2788
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2812
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2844
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	7	4/7	57.1 %	+1/=6/−0	2773
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	10	7/10	70.0 %	+4/=6/−0	2864
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2794
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2874
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2587
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2823
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2854
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	7/9	77.8 %	+5/=4/−0	2916
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2930
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2525
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2745
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	6	5/6	83.3 %	+5/=0/−1	2932
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2893
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2968
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2925
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2790

Meilleur : 71 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 70 % vs Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2827 · 498 parties · 59.4 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2827± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	39	15.5/39	39.7 %	+9/=13/−17	2859
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2823
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2765
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	40	19.5/40	48.8 %	+12/=15/−13	2873
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	24	9/24	37.5 %	+4/=10/−10	2791
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	22	10.5/22	47.7 %	+9/=3/−10	2824
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2643
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2608
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	24	13.5/24	56.2 %	+9/=9/−6	2831
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2622
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3072
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2794
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2680
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	8	5/8	62.5 %	+5/=0/−3	2823
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	60	36.5/60	60.8 %	+27/=19/−14	2806
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2915
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2853
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3515
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2852
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	23	14.5/23	63.0 %	+13/=3/−7	2800
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2752
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	25	18.5/25	74.0 %	+15/=7/−3	2881
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2889
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	56	34.5/56	61.6 %	+25/=19/−12	2776
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	23	15/23	65.2 %	+12/=6/−5	2784
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2799
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+11/=5/−3	2812
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2964
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3446
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3438
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2968
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	3033
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3335

Meilleur : 74 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2826 · 90 parties · 47.2 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2826± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	18	4/18	22.2 %	+1/=6/−11	2770
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+4/=7/−5	2858
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+6/=5/−7	2821
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	19	11.5/19	60.5 %	+7/=9/−3	2861
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	19	11/19	57.9 %	+9/=4/−6	2806

Meilleur : 61 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 22 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2796 · 60 parties · 56.7 % · err ±26

Cote Ordo2796± 26

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	15	10/15	66.7 %	+7/=6/−2	2907
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2658
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+6/=7/−2	2827
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2795

Meilleur : 67 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 33 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2787 · 913 parties · 55.9 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2787± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	2990	20	4/20	20.0 %	+2/=4/−14	2749
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2708
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	2930	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2788
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2530
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2606
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	36	14.5/36	40.3 %	+7/=15/−14	2812
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2843	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2843
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	43	17.5/43	40.7 %	+7/=21/−15	2775
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2643
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2954
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	24	10.5/24	43.8 %	+6/=9/−9	2783
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2826	19	7.5/19	39.5 %	+3/=9/−7	2751
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5/15	33.3 %	+2/=6/−7	2676
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2785	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+5/=9/−4	2804
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2753
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2834
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2771	20	9/20	45.0 %	+7/=4/−9	2736
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2827
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	33	15/33	45.5 %	+11/=8/−14	2731
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	38	22/38	57.9 %	+16/=12/−10	2816
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	5/9	55.6 %	+1/=8/−0	2789
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3538
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2737	20	12/20	60.0 %	+9/=6/−5	2808
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	2881
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	47	28/47	59.6 %	+22/=12/−13	2800
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	60	35.5/60	59.2 %	+27/=17/−16	2794
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3003
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2825
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2719	14	8/14	57.1 %	+7/=2/−5	2769
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2751
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2751
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2759
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2835
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	26	15/26	57.7 %	+12/=6/−8	2761
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2868
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	25	18/25	72.0 %	+15/=6/−4	2864
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	34	19.5/34	57.4 %	+13/=13/−8	2750
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2835
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	56	36.5/56	65.2 %	+26/=21/−9	2803
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2715
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	55	35/55	63.6 %	+28/=14/−13	2772
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3462
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	50	35.5/50	71.0 %	+26/=19/−5	2812
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2734
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2812
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2735
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2745
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2968
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2842
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2655

Meilleur : 72 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 20 % vs Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2785 · 96 parties · 41.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2785± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	20	7/20	35.0 %	+6/=2/−12	2880
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+4/=5/−11	2753
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2649
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+4/=9/−5	2768
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	2893

Meilleur : 69 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2778 · 169 parties · 58.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2778± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2689
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	2917
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2812
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2732
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2764
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2719	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2694
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2787
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+9/=1/−5	2795
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2696
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2680
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	2843
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2758
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2844

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 46 % vs Deep Fritz — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2775 · 107 parties · 55.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2775± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2912
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2782
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2834
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2729
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2726
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2705
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2907
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2715
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2877
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2512
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2932
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2698
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	2733
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2847
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2638
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3387
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3335

Meilleur : 79 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 42 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2771 · 98 parties · 39.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2771± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	19	3/19	15.8 %	+1/=4/−14	2697
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	20	6/20	30.0 %	+4/=4/−12	2733
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+5/=7/−8	2787
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	20	11/20	55.0 %	+9/=4/−7	2822
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2787

Meilleur : 55 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 16 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2769 · 177 parties · 56.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2769± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2912
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	3006
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2654
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2738
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	6	3/6	50.0 %	+2/=2/−2	2834
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	2974
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2729
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2614
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2751
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+1/=1/−3	2591
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2734
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2915
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2646
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	2804
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	3/6	50.0 %	+1/=4/−1	2715
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2844
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3502
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2629
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2639
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	3121
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	2888
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2656
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2603
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2696
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2778
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	2761

Meilleur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2763 · 290 parties · 57.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2763± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	33	18/33	54.5 %	+14/=8/−11	2819
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	34	16.5/34	48.5 %	+6/=21/−7	2751
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	48	23/48	47.9 %	+16/=14/−18	2718
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	2820
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	49	27.5/49	56.1 %	+19/=17/−13	2741
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	48	32/48	66.7 %	+24/=16/−8	2795
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	48	29/48	60.4 %	+23/=12/−13	2730
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	15	12/15	80.0 %	+9/=6/−0	2845

Meilleur : 80 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 48 % vs Junior 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2761 · 389 parties · 55.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2761± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2632
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2842
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2778
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2840
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	2034
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2516
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	38	16/38	42.1 %	+10/=12/−16	2732
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	2916
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	34	17.5/34	51.5 %	+7/=21/−6	2773
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2701
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3050
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2854
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	33	18.5/33	56.1 %	+14/=9/−10	2775
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2653
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2667
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2774
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2715
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2933
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2761
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	2735
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2832
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	33	22.5/33	68.2 %	+15/=15/−3	2831
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2639
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	40	24.5/40	61.3 %	+17/=15/−8	2755
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	36	22/36	61.1 %	+17/=10/−9	2735
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2653
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3446
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	5	4/5	80.0 %	+4/=0/−1	2879
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2631
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2655

Meilleur : 68 % vs Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 42 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2756 · 90 parties · 60.6 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2756± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2759
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	2781
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2757
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+7/=3/−3	2806
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2884
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2738
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2578

Meilleur : 77 % vs SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread · plus dur : 46 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2751 · 521 parties · 48.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2751± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	38	10/38	26.3 %	+4/=12/−22	2752
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2530
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2547
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	40	15.5/40	38.8 %	+6/=19/−15	2802
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2743
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2843	20	8/20	40.0 %	+4/=8/−8	2773
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2720
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2554
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2745
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2783
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2826	19	8/19	42.1 %	+6/=4/−9	2770
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	9	4/9	44.4 %	+0/=8/−1	2748
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2785	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2642
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2800
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2771	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2734
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2811
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2859
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2737	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2737
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+2/=5/−0	2836
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	60	32.5/60	54.2 %	+21/=23/−16	2759
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2603
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2914
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+3/=3/−3	2716
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2765
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2613
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2866
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2773
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	2778
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2609
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	55	33.5/55	60.9 %	+22/=23/−10	2771
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2586
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2799
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2656
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	2932
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2677
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2630
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2724
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	2896

Meilleur : 61 % vs Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread · plus dur : 26 % vs Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2738 · 225 parties · 51.8 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2738± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2721
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2659
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2845
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2801
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2784
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2885
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1987
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+3/=1/−1	2916
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2450
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2630
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2675
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2813
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2812
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2755
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3053
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2524
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2657
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2668
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	13	8/13	61.5 %	+6/=4/−3	2781
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2797
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	4/8	50.0 %	+1/=6/−1	2698
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2777
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3069
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2767
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2638
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2821
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2828
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2790

Meilleur : 80 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2737 · 100 parties · 35.5 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2737± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	2718
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	20	7/20	35.0 %	+2/=10/−8	2772
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	7/20	35.0 %	+3/=8/−9	2732
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	20	8/20	40.0 %	+5/=6/−9	2717
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2751

Meilleur : 50 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 18 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

The King 3.50 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2734 · 424 parties · 47.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2734± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2487
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2371
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2906
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2243
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2899
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2769
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2740
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2824
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2530
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2696
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2659
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2544
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2569
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2538
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2684
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2786
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2772
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2708
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2034
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2755
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	3/8	37.5 %	+3/=0/−5	2738
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	2640
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2804
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2640
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+0/=5/−2	2649
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2797
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	60	34/60	56.7 %	+25/=18/−17	2776
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	5	2.5/5	50.0 %	+1/=3/−1	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2755
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	2436
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2785
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+2/=5/−0	2809
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2868
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+4/=5/−5	2675
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+3/=5/−3	2700
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	6/9	66.7 %	+3/=6/−0	2818
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	53	27.5/53	51.9 %	+18/=19/−16	2707
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2901
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	6/8	75.0 %	+6/=0/−2	2853
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2936
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2907
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2767
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2758
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3430
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2507
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+3/=5/−1	2666
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2776

Meilleur : 80 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 14 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2732 · 406 parties · 52.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2732± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2614
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+2/=7/−6	2702
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	47	19/47	40.4 %	+13/=12/−22	2720
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2778
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	48	25/48	52.1 %	+18/=14/−16	2777
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	33	14.5/33	43.9 %	+10/=9/−14	2718
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2729
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2795
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2675
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	33	18/33	54.5 %	+14/=8/−11	2730
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	55	33/55	60.0 %	+26/=14/−15	2745
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	56	37/56	66.1 %	+31/=12/−13	2772
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	28	15/28	53.6 %	+10/=10/−8	2678
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2725
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2682
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2719

Meilleur : 66 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2730 · 720 parties · 49.6 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2730± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	60	20.5/60	34.2 %	+11/=19/−30	2726
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	60	23.5/60	39.2 %	+14/=19/−27	2750
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	60	24.5/60	40.8 %	+16/=17/−27	2723
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	60	27.5/60	45.8 %	+16/=23/−21	2722
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	60	26/60	43.3 %	+17/=18/−25	2687
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2847
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2694	410	228/410	55.6 %	+117/=222/−71	2733

Meilleur : 70 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 34 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2725 · 118 parties · 50.0 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2725± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2187
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	2712
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2649
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2740
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2657
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1875
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2735
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2773
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	9	7/9	77.8 %	+6/=2/−1	2822
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2905
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	9	7/9	77.8 %	+7/=0/−2	2816
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2695

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2724 · 102 parties · 51.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2724± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2885
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2720
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2713
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2507
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2578
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2871
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2650
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2734
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1916
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2595
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2715
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2828
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2982
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2820
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2797
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2577
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2638
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2910
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3387
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2726

Meilleur : 64 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 64 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2723 · 132 parties · 48.5 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2723± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2573
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2504
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3031
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	7	3/7	42.9 %	+0/=6/−1	2784
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2827
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2685
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2831
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2560
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2650
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	5	2.5/5	50.0 %	+1/=3/−1	2734
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2724
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2716
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2804
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2594
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2757
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2702
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2750
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2636
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2698
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2764
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2853
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2656
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2373
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2837
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2917
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3430
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2707
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2815

Meilleur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2719 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo2719± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2681
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	14	6/14	42.9 %	+5/=2/−7	2737
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2803
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	14	6/14	42.9 %	+3/=6/−5	2650
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+4/=7/−3	2724

Meilleur : 54 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 29 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2716 · 234 parties · 48.1 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2716± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2791
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2783
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+0/=5/−5	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2720
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	10	3/10	30.0 %	+0/=6/−4	2687
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2690
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2752
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2585
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2839
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2811
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+3/=3/−3	2751
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2700
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2695
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3524
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2723
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2715
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2817
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2844
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+2/=5/−2	2702
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	2673
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2870
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2737
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2636
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2503
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2570
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2465
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2506
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2767
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2681
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2821
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2626
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	2726

Meilleur : 73 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 25 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2716 · 121 parties · 51.2 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2716± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2732
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2752
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2708
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2654
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2653
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2696
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2750
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2745
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2656
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	29	19/29	65.5 %	+15/=8/−6	2764

Meilleur : 66 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2715 · 214 parties · 48.4 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2715± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2632
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2694
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2845
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2502
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2755
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2027
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2743
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2680
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2702
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2701
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2400
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	3013
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2844
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2634
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2716
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	2906
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+1/=5/−0	2766
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2543
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2854
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2731
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2748
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2631
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	2942
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2659
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2656
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2812
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2735
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2517
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2542
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2898
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2605

Meilleur : 71 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2715 · 193 parties · 48.4 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2715± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2791
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2574
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2625
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2751
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2554
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2675
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2690
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2667
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	3/6	50.0 %	+1/=4/−1	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2853
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	2929
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2663
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2844
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2614
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2524
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+1/=5/−0	2766
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2761
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2629
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2668
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2742
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2516
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	2888
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1856
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3446
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2758
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2630
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2746
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2790

Meilleur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2707 · 310 parties · 45.8 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2707± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2112
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2504
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2600
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	27	10/27	37.0 %	+6/=8/−13	2748
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2954
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	23	8.5/23	37.0 %	+7/=3/−13	2734
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	26	11/26	42.3 %	+8/=6/−12	2733
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2605
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2632
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2535
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2592
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2788
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+0/=5/−2	2632
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2603
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2673
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2580
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+0/=5/−1	2657
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+0/=5/−1	2656
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2746
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	28	14.5/28	51.8 %	+11/=7/−10	2712
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2668
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	2889
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	24	11/24	45.8 %	+5/=12/−7	2646
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2821
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	2882
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2812
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2367
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2758
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2821
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2657
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2846

Meilleur : 79 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 27 % vs Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2702 · 227 parties · 46.3 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2702± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2912
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2726
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+1/=1/−7	2600
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2370
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2643
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2713
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2777
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	2621
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2966
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1969
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2702
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2680
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2773
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	2568
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2444
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+2/=5/−2	2716
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2874
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2656
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2663
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	13	7/13	53.8 %	+6/=2/−5	2726
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2731
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2737
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2733
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2997
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2847
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	5	3/5	60.0 %	+1/=4/−0	2723
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2926
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2758
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2676
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2672

Meilleur : 55 % vs Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2700 · 551 parties · 44.7 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2700± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2775
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2715
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2648
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	45	15/45	33.3 %	+8/=14/−23	2720
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2034
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2680
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	25	6.5/25	26.0 %	+3/=7/−15	2645
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2796	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2702
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	25	7/25	28.0 %	+4/=6/−15	2623
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+5/=1/−9	2683
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2543
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2839
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	2642
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	2726
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	2674
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	2672
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	13	5/13	38.5 %	+3/=4/−6	2657
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+5/=5/−4	2759
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2757
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2603
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2673
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2719	14	8/14	57.1 %	+5/=6/−3	2769
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	2743
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2763
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2561
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2785
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	28	13.5/28	48.2 %	+10/=7/−11	2695
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	13	6/13	46.2 %	+5/=2/−6	2676
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2529
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+4/=5/−2	2762
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2775
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2795
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2759
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2758
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	34	21.5/34	63.2 %	+14/=15/−5	2747
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2456
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2702
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2630
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2695
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	12	6/12	50.0 %	+2/=8/−2	2535

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2700 · 338 parties · 61.5 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2700± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2628
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2641
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+3/=5/−3	2734
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2582
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2627
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2787
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2546
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2684
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2747
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2739
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2671
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2870
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2830
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+6/=5/−0	2888
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2694
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2723
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2524
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2621
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2710
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2677
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2728
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2659
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2757
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2739
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2535
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	13.5/14	96.4 %	+13/=1/−0	2936
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3158
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	13.5/14	96.4 %	+13/=1/−0	2888
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3065
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3028
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3026
Mephisto RISC II	2218	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2650
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	14	14/14	100.0 %	+14/=0/−0	2971
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	2839

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 · plus dur : 27 % vs Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2699 · 304 parties · 47.5 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2699± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	34	14.5/34	42.6 %	+8/=13/−13	2736
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	49	21.5/49	43.9 %	+13/=17/−19	2720
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	33	10.5/33	31.8 %	+3/=15/−15	2628
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2698
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	33	15/33	45.5 %	+11/=8/−14	2701
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2719	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+3/=7/−4	2694
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2784
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	47	25.5/47	54.3 %	+19/=13/−15	2705
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	45	22/45	48.9 %	+17/=10/−18	2649
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+7/=5/−1	2826
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2663

Meilleur : 73 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2698 · 224 parties · 46.2 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2698± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2530
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2815
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2836
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2649
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	9	2/9	22.2 %	+0/=4/−5	2616
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2636
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2650
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2827
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2819
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2839
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	8	4/8	50.0 %	+1/=6/−1	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	3/9	33.3 %	+0/=6/−3	2613
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2844
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2678
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2665
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2671
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2516
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2664
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+2/=5/−4	2636
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2567
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2721
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2850
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1856
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	8	6/8	75.0 %	+6/=0/−2	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2926
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+3/=5/−1	2716
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2821
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2626
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2790

Meilleur : 41 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2696 · 189 parties · 56.1 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2696± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2778
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+3/=3/−7	2646
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2764
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2716
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2610
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	9	6/9	66.7 %	+6/=0/−3	2795
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2693
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2614
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	24	14/24	58.3 %	+13/=2/−9	2663
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	29	21.5/29	74.1 %	+19/=5/−5	2786
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	23	14/23	60.9 %	+10/=8/−5	2675
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	20	11/20	55.0 %	+10/=2/−8	2622

Meilleur : 74 % vs Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs Fritz 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread

Apple Silicon M1 Max · cote Ordo 2694 · 686 parties · 42.0 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2694± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	56	18/56	32.1 %	+4/=28/−24	2710
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	56	21.5/56	38.4 %	+12/=19/−25	2745
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	56	19.5/56	34.8 %	+9/=21/−26	2678
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	55	21.5/55	39.1 %	+10/=23/−22	2674
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	53	25.5/53	48.1 %	+16/=19/−18	2721
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2730	410	182/410	44.4 %	+71/=222/−117	2690

Meilleur : 48 % vs The King 3.50 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2680 · 85 parties · 44.1 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo2680± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2770
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2752
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2778
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2646
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2605
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2605
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2621
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2723

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 37 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2675 · 676 parties · 42.5 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2675± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2791
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2783
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2778
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	30	7.5/30	25.0 %	+2/=11/−17	2649
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2579
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	23	8/23	34.8 %	+5/=6/−12	2718
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	55	20/55	36.4 %	+13/=14/−28	2690
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2610
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	2717
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	2323
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	48	16/48	33.3 %	+8/=16/−24	2642
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	40	15.5/40	38.8 %	+8/=15/−17	2681
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2547
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2839
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2508
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	55	22/55	40.0 %	+15/=14/−26	2662
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3525
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2634
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2755
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2646
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2759
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2874
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	24	13/24	54.2 %	+7/=12/−5	2736
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2644
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2579
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+0/=5/−6	2487
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	47	21.5/47	45.7 %	+15/=13/−19	2669
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2698
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	9	3/9	33.3 %	+3/=0/−6	2575
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2750
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2525
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2659
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	55	34.5/55	62.7 %	+27/=15/−13	2747
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	39	22/39	56.4 %	+12/=20/−7	2698
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2703
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2558
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2638
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2821
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2626
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2585

Meilleur : 63 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 23 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2662 · 200 parties · 41.0 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2662± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2632
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	1/8	12.5 %	+1/=0/−7	2547
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2880
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2423
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2834
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2971
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2690
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	1987
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2543
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2614
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	8	2/8	25.0 %	+2/=0/−6	2543
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2532
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2876
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2436
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2489
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2548
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2702
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2602
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2668
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2639
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2812
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2850
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2812
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	2864
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2485
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	7	2/7	28.6 %	+2/=0/−5	2376

Meilleur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 36 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2659 · 194 parties · 53.4 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2659± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2547
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2649
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2738
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2449
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2578
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2423
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2662
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2548
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2543
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2635
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2634
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2805
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2715
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2626
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2618
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2364
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2509
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2636
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2507
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2471
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2564
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2549
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2719
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2498
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2849
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2726
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2776
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2903
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2873
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2824
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3138
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3135
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3106
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2665

Meilleur : 90 % vs Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

List 512 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2656 · 538 parties · 41.5 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2656± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2573
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2689
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3031
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2745
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+3/=5/−11	2671
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	50	14.5/50	29.0 %	+5/=19/−26	2631
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2676
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2585
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2769
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	48	19/48	39.6 %	+13/=12/−23	2689
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	36	14/36	38.9 %	+9/=10/−17	2682
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2674
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2751
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2618
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2454
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	56	19/56	33.9 %	+13/=12/−31	2617
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2646
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2723
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2907
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2716
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2715
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3515
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2481
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2512
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2598
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2832
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	45	23/45	51.1 %	+18/=10/−17	2706
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3498
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2659
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2715
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	55	20.5/55	37.3 %	+13/=15/−27	2585
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	29	12.5/29	43.1 %	+7/=11/−11	2605
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2653
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2638
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2752
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2711
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2706
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+3/=7/−2	2616
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2726

Meilleur : 70 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2653 · 368 parties · 48.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2653± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2705
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2778	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2587
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	28	13/28	46.4 %	+8/=10/−10	2708
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2604
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2716	29	10/29	34.5 %	+6/=8/−15	2605
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	34	12.5/34	36.8 %	+5/=15/−14	2605
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+1/=5/−7	2525
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2734
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2680	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2609
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	39	17/39	43.6 %	+7/=20/−12	2630
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	29	16.5/29	56.9 %	+11/=11/−7	2705
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	34	22.5/34	66.2 %	+15/=15/−4	2721
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	53	30.5/53	57.5 %	+17/=27/−9	2656
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	33	18/33	54.5 %	+13/=10/−10	2630
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	21	14/21	66.7 %	+12/=4/−5	2707

Meilleur : 67 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2653 · 285 parties · 51.6 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2653± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2112
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2085
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2778
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2370
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2643
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	6	1/6	16.7 %	+1/=0/−5	2554
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2516
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2628
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2819
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2761
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2471
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2322
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2479
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2533
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3003
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	2864
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2556
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2524
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2548
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	5	2/5	40.0 %	+0/=4/−1	2632
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2509
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2731
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	2/8	25.0 %	+2/=0/−6	2507
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2625
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2503
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2656
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	5	4/5	80.0 %	+4/=0/−1	2879
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2440
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2361
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2929
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2593
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3321
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2903
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2732
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2867
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2849
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3135
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3106
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2525

Meilleur : 100 % vs Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 25 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2646 · 116 parties · 42.7 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2646± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2796
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2080
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2040
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2643
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2834
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2027
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2698
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2769
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1961
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2751
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2618
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2613
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2532
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2596
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2626
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1915
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2987
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2423
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2891
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2636
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2418
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2764
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2662
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2659
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2653
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2976
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2510
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2498
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2849
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2535

Meilleur : 85 % vs Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2638 · 235 parties · 39.8 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2638± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+1/=1/−3	2764
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2630
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	2080
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	2560
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2579
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2679
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2775
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2710
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	5	1/5	20.0 %	+1/=0/−4	2520
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2712
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2738
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2613
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2444
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2673
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2836
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2594
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2587
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2582
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2636
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2661
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+1/=5/−3	2619
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2675
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2436
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2656
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	5	1/5	20.0 %	+1/=0/−4	2412
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2308
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2968
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2746
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3348
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2655
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2771
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3084

Meilleur : 50 % vs SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2630 · 212 parties · 57.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2630± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2796
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2080
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2040
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2745
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2489
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2449
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2680
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2672
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2751
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2548
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1934
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2444
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1923
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2526
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2804
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2715
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2516
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2614
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2700
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2602
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2507
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2484
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2573
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2570
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2844
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2767
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2300
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2587
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2548
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2624
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3003
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3106
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2665
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3034
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2988
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2682
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2963
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2627

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 36 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2627 · 167 parties · 28.1 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2627± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3287	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2487
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3171	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2371
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3097	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2297
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3043	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2573
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	2987	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2187
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	2959	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2705
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	2931	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2461
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	2913	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2575
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	2886	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2548
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2882	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2411
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2625
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	2876	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2622
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	2874	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2620
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	2874	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2536
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	2861	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2606
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2502
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2854
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2668
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2789
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2870
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3028

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2604 · 171 parties · 40.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2604± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2763	15	3/15	20.0 %	+0/=6/−9	2522
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2756	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2783
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2612
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	2/9	22.2 %	+1/=2/−6	2507
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2699	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2640
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	24	10/24	41.7 %	+9/=2/−13	2637
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2509
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	34	11.5/34	33.8 %	+4/=15/−15	2536
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	15	6/15	40.0 %	+3/=6/−6	2533
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2645
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2734

Meilleur : 70 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 20 % vs Fritz 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2603 · 195 parties · 46.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2603± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2654
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2424
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	29	7.5/29	25.9 %	+5/=5/−19	2513
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2549
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	53	22.5/53	42.5 %	+9/=27/−17	2600
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	15	9/15	60.0 %	+6/=6/−3	2675
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2598
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	21	11.5/21	54.8 %	+9/=5/−7	2620
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	34	24/34	70.6 %	+20/=8/−6	2687

Meilleur : 71 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 15 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2598 · 126 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2598± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2732	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2612
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	9	2/9	22.2 %	+2/=0/−7	2507
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	23	9/23	39.1 %	+5/=8/−10	2619
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2549
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	33	15/33	45.5 %	+10/=10/−13	2621
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2558
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2603
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+4/=7/−2	2641

Meilleur : 58 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2587 · 450 parties · 49.9 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2587± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2495
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2748
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	2080
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2703
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2554
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2496
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	2381
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2532
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1975
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2578
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2717
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2614
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2498
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+1/=5/−3	2655
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2725	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2617
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1924
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2603
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2678
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2404
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2556
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2637
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2614
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2592
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2529
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2659
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2696	20	9/20	45.0 %	+8/=2/−10	2661
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2636
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2764
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2748
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+2/=7/−3	2627
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2653	21	7/21	33.3 %	+5/=4/−12	2532
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	2878
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2735
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2479
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2630
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2604	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2457
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	21	9.5/21	45.2 %	+7/=5/−9	2570
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2598	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+2/=7/−4	2544
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2789
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2655
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3033
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3032
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2793
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2997
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3166
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3139
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3138
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3135
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3106
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3084
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3056

Meilleur : 100 % vs Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 20 % vs Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz

68040 40 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2548 · 406 parties · 68.8 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2548± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2509
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2358
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2271
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2345
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1838
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2630
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2386
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2346
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2234
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+8/=1/−7	2543
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	15	8/15	53.3 %	+7/=2/−6	2544
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2421
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	12	9/12	75.0 %	+8/=2/−2	2676
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2877
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	44	32.5/44	73.9 %	+29/=7/−8	2543
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	46	41/46	89.1 %	+36/=10/−0	2724
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2851
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2396
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2547
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	43	37/43	86.0 %	+34/=6/−3	2631
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2438
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2525
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3065
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2768
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3028
Mephisto RISC II	2218	43	40.5/43	94.2 %	+39/=3/−1	2702
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	2482
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	2839

Meilleur : 95 % vs Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 10 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2535 · 490 parties · 58.6 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2535± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	2912	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2573
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	2885	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2547
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	2880	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2498
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2840	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2732
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2834	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2496
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2834	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2579
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2787	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2667
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2775	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1975
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2769	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2543
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2761	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2640
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2751	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	2389
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2738	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2484
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2734	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2493
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2724	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2533
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2723	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2444
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2716	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2526
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2715	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2645
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2715	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2460
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2707	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2396
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2702	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2565
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2700	12	6/12	50.0 %	+2/=8/−2	2700
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2700
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2698	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2443
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2675	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2625
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2662	7	5/7	71.4 %	+5/=0/−2	2821
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2468
List 512 — 1 Thread	2656	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2465
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2594
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2646	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2646
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2517
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2542
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2603	34	10/34	29.4 %	+6/=8/−20	2451
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2467
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2849
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3033
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2903
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2587
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2873
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2867
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2760
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3166
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2740
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3139
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3138
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3135
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2688
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3106
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3084
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3056
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3034
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3028
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2988
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2682
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2963
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2944
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2915

Meilleur : 100 % vs Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 10 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2521 · 150 parties · 64.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2521± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2404
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1853
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2075
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+7/=1/−8	2526
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2023
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2680
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2875
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	16	12/16	75.0 %	+10/=4/−2	2549
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2827
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3106
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2566
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3034
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3028
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2490

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2521 · 150 parties · 64.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2521± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2277
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2271
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2075
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	15	7/15	46.7 %	+6/=2/−7	2525
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2153
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2890
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2745
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	15	11/15	73.3 %	+9/=4/−2	2534
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2697
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2688
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2776
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2615
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2740
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2988

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2517 · 105 parties · 80.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2517± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2465
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+8/=5/−1	2554
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+8/=3/−3	2445
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	13	9/13	69.2 %	+7/=4/−2	2367
Mephisto RISC II	2218	13	13/13	100.0 %	+13/=0/−0	3018
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2602
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2591
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2925
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2395
Novag Sapphire	2097	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2897
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2370
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2829

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto RISC II · plus dur : 40 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2491 · 153 parties · 58.5 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2491± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2277
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2412
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2358
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2119
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2286
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2618
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2153
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3178
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2745
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2466
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2616
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2688
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2372
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2745
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2530
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2700

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2486 · 150 parties · 62.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2486± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2321
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2271
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2075
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	12	3/12	25.0 %	+2/=2/−8	2357
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2153
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3178
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+7/=5/−0	2595
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2590
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	9/13	69.2 %	+8/=2/−3	2456
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	13	10/13	76.9 %	+8/=4/−1	2516
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	12	10/12	83.3 %	+9/=2/−1	2544
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	12	10/12	83.3 %	+10/=0/−2	2513
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3028
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2988

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHzturbo

ARM2 400 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2378 · 235 parties · 55.5 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2378± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2153
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2220
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2009
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1691
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1686
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+8/=1/−6	2412
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	27	14/27	51.9 %	+10/=8/−9	2376
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	15	7/15	46.7 %	+6/=2/−7	2316
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2274
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2467
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	26	18.5/26	71.2 %	+15/=7/−4	2472
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+5/=7/−0	2460
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2585
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2427
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3018
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	27	22.5/27	83.3 %	+19/=7/−1	2450
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2944

Meilleur : 100 % vs Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2366 · 150 parties · 53.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2366± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2036
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+6/=1/−8	2332
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	11/14	78.6 %	+10/=2/−2	2589
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	15	5/15	33.3 %	+5/=0/−10	2238
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	2541
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	2330
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	2424
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2535
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	10/15	66.7 %	+7/=6/−2	2349
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2570

Meilleur : 90 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Genius 68030 London

68EC030 33,3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2363 · 763 parties · 64.7 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2363± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	14	0.5/14	3.6 %	+0/=1/−13	2127
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	44	11.5/44	26.1 %	+8/=7/−29	2367
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2009
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2139
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+1/=5/−8	2326
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2110
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+0/=5/−7	2254
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	27	13/27	48.1 %	+9/=8/−10	2366
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	14	3/14	21.4 %	+2/=2/−10	2140
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	43	18/43	41.9 %	+16/=4/−23	2301
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+2/=5/−7	2209
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2205
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2335
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	8.5/14	60.7 %	+6/=5/−3	2391
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2136
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2306
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2249
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2455
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2124
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2292
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+6/=5/−7	2209
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2380
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2218	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2427
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2359
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2139
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	15	11/15	73.3 %	+9/=4/−2	2346
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2375
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2671
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2526
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2257
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2328
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2247
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2568
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2244
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2391
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2888
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2566
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	2350
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2330
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2264
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2342
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2338
Saitek President	1918	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2718
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2152
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2185
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2183
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2659
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2348
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2632
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2601
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2304
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2556
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2250
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Prisma · plus dur : 4 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz

68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2358 · 371 parties · 48.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2358± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1900
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2116
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	46	5/46	10.9 %	+0/=10/−36	2182
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2153
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	16	4/16	25.0 %	+2/=4/−10	2330
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	15	4/15	26.7 %	+2/=4/−9	2345
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2384
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2254
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	15	10/15	66.7 %	+10/=0/−5	2486
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	43	25/43	58.1 %	+23/=4/−16	2420
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+8/=3/−3	2469
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2435
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	2364
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	43	28/43	65.1 %	+26/=4/−13	2423
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2284
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2353
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2389
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3028
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1426
Mephisto RISC II	2218	43	29.5/43	68.6 %	+28/=3/−12	2354
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	14	11/14	78.6 %	+10/=2/−2	2396
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2252
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2839

Meilleur : 79 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 · plus dur : 5 % vs WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2339 · 150 parties · 50.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2339± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2036
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	15	8/15	53.3 %	+7/=2/−6	2402
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+7/=5/−2	2493
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+3/=3/−8	2228
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	9/14	64.3 %	+5/=8/−1	2417
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	15	9/15	60.0 %	+6/=6/−3	2377
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	15	8/15	53.3 %	+6/=4/−5	2288
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2535
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	14	8.5/14	60.7 %	+7/=3/−4	2304
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2379

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2338 · 150 parties · 45.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2338± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	1859
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2141
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2489
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2442
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2495
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2261
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	8/12	66.7 %	+5/=6/−1	2435
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	2336
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2265
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2404
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2287
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+6/=5/−0	2401

Meilleur : 77 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2335 · 150 parties · 44.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2335± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1859
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1853
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2335
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2246
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2363
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2329
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2435
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2306
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	11	9/11	81.8 %	+8/=2/−1	2526
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2615
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2349
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	9/11	81.8 %	+9/=0/−2	2450

Meilleur : 90 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020

68EC020 24,6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2315 · 760 parties · 61.1 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2315± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	14	0.5/14	3.6 %	+0/=1/−13	2127
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	43	6/43	14.0 %	+3/=6/−34	2232
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2009
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2139
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+3/=3/−8	2387
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2190
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	13	4/13	30.8 %	+3/=2/−8	2345
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	26	7.5/26	28.8 %	+4/=7/−15	2222
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2140
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	5.5/14	39.3 %	+3/=5/−6	2287
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	43	15/43	34.9 %	+13/=4/−26	2250
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	14	5/14	35.7 %	+1/=8/−5	2237
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	12	4/12	33.3 %	+1/=6/−5	2217
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2214
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2136
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2247
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2284
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2265
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2389
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2136
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+8/=3/−7	2248
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2346
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2065
Mephisto RISC II	2218	13	7/13	53.8 %	+5/=4/−4	2245
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2247
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2202
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+8/=3/−2	2344
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2333
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2480
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2445
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2366
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2186
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+6/=5/−0	2328
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2352
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2287
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2331
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2389
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2186
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2456
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2411
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2153
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2761
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2756
Saitek President	1918	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2300
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2423
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2395
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2393
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2659
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2348
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2344
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2198
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2312
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2592
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2556
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2199
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 4 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2306 · 290 parties · 53.4 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2306± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1830
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2153
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1721
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2139
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2110
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	13	3/13	23.1 %	+1/=4/−8	2276
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	2343
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2533
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	15	6/15	40.0 %	+3/=6/−6	2269
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2308
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2335
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2485
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+3/=5/−4	2277
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2213
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2320
Mephisto RISC II	2218	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2247
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2552
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2330
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2526
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2245
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2286
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2148
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2411
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2474
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2761

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2306 · 150 parties · 41.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2306± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1859
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1853
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2415
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+0/=7/−5	2224
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2363
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2329
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2373
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+4/=5/−3	2336
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2265
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2366
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2399
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2401

Meilleur : 77 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2284 · 157 parties · 34.1 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2284± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2659	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2277
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2653	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2412
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2638	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1838
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2249
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2307
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2077
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2398
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2358
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2315
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2377
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2372
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2341
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2299
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2223

Meilleur : 65 % vs Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2265 · 177 parties · 39.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2265± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1900
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1748
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2220
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2009
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2384
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	12	2/12	16.7 %	+1/=2/−9	2206
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2207
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2172
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2269
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	15	7/15	46.7 %	+5/=4/−6	2316
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2338
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	2/11	18.2 %	+1/=2/−8	2073
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2315
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2306
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2176
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	2285
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2508
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2226
Mephisto RISC II	2218	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2307
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2361
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2335
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	2839
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2722

Meilleur : 75 % vs Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU · plus dur : 5 % vs Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2256 · 150 parties · 42.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2256± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2587	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1787
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2036
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2208
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2495
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2226
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2183
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2243
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2236
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2175
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2441
Mephisto RISC II	2218	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2160
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2401
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2383

Meilleur : 77 % vs Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2234 · 276 parties · 45.7 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2234± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1830
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1721
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2139
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1980
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	12	2/12	16.7 %	+2/=0/−10	2206
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2064
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2305
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2038
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2167
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1953
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2412
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2173
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2176
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2315
Mephisto RISC II	2218	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2389
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2341
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	2257
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2291
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2295
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2417
Novag Sapphire	2097	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+7/=1/−4	2185
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2391
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2411
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2474
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2173

Meilleur : 95 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz

68040 40 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2228 · 329 parties · 43.3 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2228± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1900
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2627	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1827
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1748
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1721
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2009
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2190
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1686
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	15	5/15	33.3 %	+2/=6/−7	2245
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+7/=5/−6	2382
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	14	5.5/14	39.3 %	+4/=3/−7	2263
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2279
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2214
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+7/=3/−8	2296
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2213
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	1985
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2044
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2226
Mephisto RISC II	2218	13	11/13	84.6 %	+11/=0/−2	2514
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+11/=1/−6	2270
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+7/=3/−5	2206
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2179
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	15	11/15	73.3 %	+10/=2/−3	2301
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+8/=3/−4	2210
Novag Sapphire	2097	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+11/=1/−3	2303
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	15	10/15	66.7 %	+9/=2/−4	2210
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2839
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2304

Meilleur : 90 % vs Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)

H8S/2312 25 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2226 · 379 parties · 76.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2226± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1900
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	13	4/13	30.8 %	+2/=4/−7	2376
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2209
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3158
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2195
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2265
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2228
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2174
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2027
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2136
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2128
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2316
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2186
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2436
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2204
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2281
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2088
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1239
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2064
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2763
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2202
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek President	1918	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2718
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2152
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2266
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2264
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2659
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2138
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2632
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2198
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2185
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2182
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2592
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2267
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2106
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	1814

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 25 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2224 · 238 parties · 79.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2224± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2204
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2474
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2276
Mephisto RISC II	2218	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2011
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	7	3/7	42.9 %	+3/=0/−4	2110
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2571
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2561
Novag Sapphire	2097	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	2513
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2090
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2188
Novag Zircon II	1963	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2274
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2431
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	1797
Saitek President	1918	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2229
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2222
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2684
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2327
Novag Turquoise	1859	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2659
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2167
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2148
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2632
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	7	5/7	71.4 %	+5/=0/−2	1976
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2114
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2112
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2592
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2556
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2085

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto RISC II

65SC02 2,5 MHz + ARM2 ChessMachine — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2218 · 637 parties · 62.3 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2218± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2268
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	43	2.5/43	5.8 %	+1/=3/−39	2064
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	13	0/13	0.0 %	+0/=0/−13	1717
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1578
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2154
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	43	13.5/43	31.4 %	+12/=3/−28	2222
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	6/13	46.2 %	+4/=4/−5	2288
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2277
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2176
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2315
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	13	2/13	15.4 %	+2/=0/−11	1932
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2417
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3024
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2359
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2235
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+10/=1/−3	2361
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2227
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2125
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2252
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2426
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2417
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2285
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2436
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2131
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2020
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2083
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	25	18/25	72.0 %	+17/=2/−6	2203
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2029
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2110
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2262
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2257
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1992
Saitek President	1918	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2219
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	9	8.5/9	94.4 %	+8/=1/−0	2403
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	2684
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+7/=1/−1	2161
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2659
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2238
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2138
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2344
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2312
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2304
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2267
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2120
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Prisma · plus dur : 0 % vs CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2188 · 288 parties · 42.0 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2188± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1830
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2220
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2521	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1721
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2491	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1980
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2486	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1686
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2366	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1984
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2193
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2339	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2148
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2338	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+0/=5/−6	2125
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	2/11	18.2 %	+2/=0/−9	2073
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2257
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2093
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2284	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2249
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2044
Mephisto RISC II	2218	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2048
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2552
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2096
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2214
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2245
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2286
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2890
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2829
Novag Zircon II	1963	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2021
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2472
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2304

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach III · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2171 · 181 parties · 50.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2171± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2119
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2023
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2395
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2283
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2256	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2044
Mephisto RISC II	2218	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2154
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2202
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2191
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1997
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2286
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1993
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2126
Novag Zircon II	1963	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2133
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2342
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2069

Meilleur : 90 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 5 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04

ARM2 14,2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2171 · 561 parties · 60.5 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2171± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	14	0/14	0.0 %	+0/=0/−14	1900
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2237
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2085
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	27	4.5/27	16.7 %	+1/=7/−19	2099
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	15	4/15	26.7 %	+2/=4/−9	2187
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	14	3/14	21.4 %	+2/=2/−10	2132
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+2/=3/−8	2142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1925
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2074
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+6/=1/−11	2129
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2261
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2218	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+3/=1/−10	2027
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1807
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2139
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	2131
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2350
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2189
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2179
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2051
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2141
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2337
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2411
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2185
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	1922
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	12	9/12	75.0 %	+8/=2/−2	2230
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2220
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	2324
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2342
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek President	1918	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2109
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2152
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1991
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2393
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2160
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2157
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2348
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2134
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2617
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2601
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2174
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2556
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2163 · 150 parties · 48.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2163± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1830
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2150
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2145
Mephisto RISC II	2218	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2154
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	2202
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2062
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2248
Novag Sapphire	2097	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2229
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2331
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2093
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2264
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2173

Meilleur : 85 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Sparc (rev.518)

SPARClite (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2160 · 492 parties · 66.6 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2160± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2085
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1994
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2136
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	2136
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+5/=3/−7	2182
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2258
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	4/7	57.1 %	+4/=0/−3	2274
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2253
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2252
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2139
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1980
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2260
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1997
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2195
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1924
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2212
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2098
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2337
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2160
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	2235
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2267
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2340
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2270
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2129
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2068
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2163
Saitek President	1918	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2109
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2293
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2185
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1989
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1929
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2077
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2214
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2042
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2094
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2267
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1979
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2199
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU

286 1800 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2144 · 173 parties · 40.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2144± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1735
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2378	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1578
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1981
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2251
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1925
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2074
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2087
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2193
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2111
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2118
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2318
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2307
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2115
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2131
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2391
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2220

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach IV · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9

68030 32 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2125 · 498 parties · 64.0 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2125± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1717
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2231
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2074
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2186
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	4/15	26.7 %	+3/=2/−10	2053
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1917
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2068
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2171
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2107
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2163
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2089
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2144
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+4/=5/−2	2179
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2147
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2200
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2058
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2198
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2235
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2143
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	21	12.5/21	59.5 %	+9/=7/−5	2106
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2176
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2033
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2152
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2026
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2163
Saitek President	1918	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2025
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1982
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2125
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1952
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2160
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2348
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2023
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2198
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2601
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2592
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2556
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2267
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	2045
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2199
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 15 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03

68000 12,3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2115 · 497 parties · 63.2 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2115± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2237
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2150
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2245
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2136
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1932
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+4/=3/−8	2133
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2156
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1917
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2018
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2000
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2107
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2031
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2350
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2144
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+2/=5/−4	2061
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2247
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2352
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2097
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	2090
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	2088
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2175
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	22	12.5/22	56.8 %	+11/=3/−8	2087
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2137
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2083
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2068
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2147
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2223
Saitek President	1918	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2065
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2293
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2266
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2183
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2160
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1907
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2073
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2008
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2102
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2094
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2267
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1894
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2199
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1959
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 15 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2115 · 150 parties · 42.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2115± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2630	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2119
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2535	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1735
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2231
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+0/=5/−6	2102
Mephisto RISC II	2218	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2048
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2234
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2062
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2093
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1983
Novag Sapphire	2097	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	1964
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2122
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2242
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2344
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2202

Meilleur : 90 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2098 · 263 parties · 68.8 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2098± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1893
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2060
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1888
Mephisto RISC II	2218	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1880
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2127
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2160
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2023
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	1861
Novag Sapphire	2097	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2140
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	8	4/8	50.0 %	+4/=0/−4	2090
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2166
Novag Zircon II	1963	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2301
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2004
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2147
Saitek President	1918	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2109
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2357
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2075
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	1971
Novag Turquoise	1859	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2170
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2047
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	1925
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2303
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2287
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	8	7/8	87.5 %	+7/=0/−1	2141
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2601
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2592
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2201
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2538
Saitek Prisma	1724	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2170
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	1942
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2085

↑ retour au classement

Novag Sapphire

Clipper C400 12,5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2097 · 480 parties · 60.9 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2097± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1717
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2216
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2124
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2005
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+4/=1/−7	2145
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+3/=1/−11	2022
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2118
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	1807
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2183
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1887
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1869
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1930
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2031
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1919
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2109
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2164
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2115
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2247
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2054
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2160
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2113
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	22	11/22	50.0 %	+9/=4/−9	2039
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2064
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+5/=3/−1	2129
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2761
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2122
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2029
Saitek President	1918	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2159
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2019
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2395
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2264
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2100
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	9	8.5/9	94.4 %	+8/=1/−0	2329
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2344
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2058
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	2080
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	9	7/9	77.8 %	+5/=4/−0	2010
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2267
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2039
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1831
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	9	8/9	88.9 %	+8/=0/−1	1938
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 15 % vs Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer Mach IV

68EC020 20 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2090 · 494 parties · 59.1 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2090± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2237
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2074
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2248
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1932
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	15	5/15	33.3 %	+4/=2/−9	2108
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2224
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2289
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1388
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2268
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1850
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1922
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2089
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1843
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2017
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	2115
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2083
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	4/8	50.0 %	+4/=0/−4	2098
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2026
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1980
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2355
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2039	22	11.5/22	52.3 %	+10/=3/−9	2055
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2099
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2203
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2152
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2103
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2029
Saitek President	1918	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2300
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2019
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2125
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2183
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2050
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1926
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1944
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1940
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2008
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2185
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2312
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2304
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	11	10/11	90.9 %	+9/=2/−0	2156
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1835
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2253
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	1961
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fidelity Designer 2000 · plus dur : 0 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHzturbo

65C02 73 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2088 · 257 parties · 62.3 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2088± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2226
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2111
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2073
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	2012
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1978
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	2115
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1989
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2198
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	2126
Novag Zircon II	1963	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1994
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2058
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek President	1918	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2429
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2058
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1948
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2264
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2027
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1979
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2102
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2033
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1947

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Constellation Forte A · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHzturbo

65C02 91 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2054 · 262 parties · 57.3 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2054± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2183
Mephisto RISC II	2218	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2189
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2303
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	1947
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2036
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	1995
Novag Sapphire	2097	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2038
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1789
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2029
Novag Zircon II	1963	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	1963
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	12	4/12	33.3 %	+4/=0/−8	1840
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek President	1918	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2429
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2032
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2125
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2123
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2157
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	1866
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1979
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2013
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2174
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1997

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Turbo King II (D+) · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz

68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2039 · 179 parties · 31.3 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2039± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2700	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1900
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2548	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1748
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2052
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2358	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1558
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	1898
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1465
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1428
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3026
Mephisto RISC II	2218	25	7/25	28.0 %	+6/=2/−17	2054
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	12	3/12	25.0 %	+2/=2/−8	1980
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1858
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	21	8.5/21	40.5 %	+5/=7/−9	2058
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	22	9.5/22	43.2 %	+8/=3/−11	2068
Novag Sapphire	2097	22	11/22	50.0 %	+9/=4/−9	2097
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	22	10.5/22	47.7 %	+9/=3/−10	2074

Meilleur : 50 % vs Novag Sapphire · plus dur : 8 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer Mach III

68000 16 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2029 · 457 parties · 53.5 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2029± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2517	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1717
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1933
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1925
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1852
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2191
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2065
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2218
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1388
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2074
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1980
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2099
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1919
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2144	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1953
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1978
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2008
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1903
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	1961
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2062
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2020
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1990
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2054
Novag Zircon II	1963	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	1919
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2262
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2064
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2163
Saitek President	1918	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1988
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2019
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2075
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1882
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2050
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1856
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2027
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1979
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	1914
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1994
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2182
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1983
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1947
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1929
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	1900
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2152
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Zircon II

H8/325 26,6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1963 · 430 parties · 48.7 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1963± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2124
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1795
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1722
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2071
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2130
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2000
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	1809
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1862
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	1994
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	1995
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1733
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1759
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+1/=3/−5	1931
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1849
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2056
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2054
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2073
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1926
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2026
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2113
Saitek President	1918	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1953
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1911
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1954
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1952
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1788
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1926
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2077
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1903
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	2178
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2044
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	1948
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2094
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1997
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	1904
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+5/=1/−3	1766
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	1714
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL

68000 12 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1961 · 441 parties · 48.6 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1961± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1981
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2306	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1506
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2234	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2021
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1985
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1753
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1917
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1677
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1789
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1789
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2163	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1950
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2052
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1934
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2008
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2115	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1874
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2054
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1297
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1899
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1990
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	8/12	66.7 %	+8/=0/−4	2175
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1728
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1997
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2026
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2029
Saitek President	1918	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1883
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1911
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2031
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1811
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1966
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2157
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1907
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2023
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2008
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1994
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2102
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2033
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1947
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2039
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2488
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1797

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Nigel Short

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1956 · 379 parties · 50.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1956± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1981
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1917
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1789
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1778
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1924
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1907
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	1931
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1943
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1706
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1672
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1921
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1892
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1890
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	1887
Saitek President	1918	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1771
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2124
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2125
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1847
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1824
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1964
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1984
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2134
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2328
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2042
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1983
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1788
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2059
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	1937
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1758
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1959
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU

286 16 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 1922 · 283 parties · 47.0 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo1922± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2265	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1465
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2228	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1847
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2148
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2188	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1807
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2171	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2024
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1919
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1884
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1814
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1989
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1982
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1788
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1772
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1853
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	1991
Saitek President	1918	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2718
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1804
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1884
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	1847
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2047
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	1984
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2023
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2058
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1836
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1983
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1863
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1885
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1928

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek President · plus dur : 10 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek President

6502 2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1918 · 374 parties · 48.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1918± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1933
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1917
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1980
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1969
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2017
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1968
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1907
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1708
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1576
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1543
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1959
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1928
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1996
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	2103
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1122
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2058
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1919
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1989
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2160
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2047
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2077
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1867
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1964
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1838
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1836
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1939
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1863
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	2018
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1689
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1989
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2152
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Maestro D++

65C02 (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1911 · 380 parties · 48.0 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1911± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1985
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	9	0.5/9	5.6 %	+0/=1/−8	1726
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1930
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1778
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1734
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1652
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1989
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1982
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1940
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	1934
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1921
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1963
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1961
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1743
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2029
Saitek President	1918	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1771
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1916
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1989
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1751
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	2177
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1837
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1896
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1746
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1973
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1908
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2094
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2057
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1846
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1688
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super Expert C v3.6

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1884 · 380 parties · 45.1 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1884± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2063
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1858
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1884
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1734
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1907
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1849
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2024
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1813
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1892
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1814
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1715
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1922
Saitek President	1918	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1883
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1879
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1847
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1929
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1856
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1984
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1940
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1924
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1911
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1766
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	1889
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	11	10/11	90.9 %	+10/=0/−1	2156
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	11	10/11	90.9 %	+9/=2/−0	2138
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2199
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1810
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super Forte C v3.6

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1882 · 379 parties · 45.1 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1882± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Mephisto RISC II	2218	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+1/=1/−7	1939
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1659
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2052
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1814
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2009
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1715
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1789
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1706
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1813
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2029
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1892
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2031
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1991
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	1957
Saitek President	1918	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1810
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1804
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1919
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1859
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1724
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1984
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1903
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	1881
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1873
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1654
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1792
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1997
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1846
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1965
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2008
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1747
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	1814

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Turquoise

65C02 (à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1859 · 344 parties · 43.3 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo1859± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1869
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2089
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1824
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1814
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1786
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1899
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2033
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1853
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1991
Saitek President	1918	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1617
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2019
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1813
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1882
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1821
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1802
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1797
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1887
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1911
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2102
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1757
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1863
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1929
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1871
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1928
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1787
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1678
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1856 · 390 parties · 39.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1856± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1714
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1837
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1869
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1919
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1315
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1907
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2020
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1288
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1753
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2029
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1892
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1659
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1848
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1731
Saitek President	1918	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1727
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1590
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1884
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2014
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1894
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	1805
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1940
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1576
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1873
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1737
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1695
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1947
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1885
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1795
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1871
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1878
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1878
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Modena (set 3)

65C02 4,2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1837 · 391 parties · 40.7 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1837± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1925
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1917
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1659
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1919
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2045
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2009
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	0.5/9	5.6 %	+0/=1/−8	1604
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1982
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1897
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2025
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1722
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1890
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1809
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1775
Saitek President	1918	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1677
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1911
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1737
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1735
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1894
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	1888
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1725
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1914
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	4/11	36.4 %	+1/=6/−4	1706
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1693
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2174
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1903
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2039
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1759
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1794
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1624
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	1641
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM V (v5.1)

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1832 · 390 parties · 40.1 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1832± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1707
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1869
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1778
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1934
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1874
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1627
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1982
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1940
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1907
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1882
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1892
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1770
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1655
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1731
Saitek President	1918	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1883
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1847
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1776
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1811
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1894
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1748
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1944
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1709
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1769
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1695
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	1788
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	11	9/11	81.8 %	+8/=2/−1	1999
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2236
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1915
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1617
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo King II (D+)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1817 · 388 parties · 38.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1817± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1933
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+2/=0/−5	2065
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1707
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1648
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1743
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1924
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1627
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1899
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1576
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1543
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	1932
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	1601
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1770
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1444
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1681
Saitek President	1918	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1771
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1982
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1776
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	1818
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1788
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1739
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1940
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1898
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1856
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	1863
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1738
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1795
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1794
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1688
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	9	8/9	88.9 %	+8/=0/−1	2001
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Constellation Forte A

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1803 · 380 parties · 36.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1803± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1659
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1648
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1814
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	1/8	12.5 %	+1/=0/−7	1759
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1795
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1708
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1288
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1722
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1770
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2026
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1992
Saitek President	1918	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1883
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1741
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1776
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1811
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1751
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1786
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	11	7/11	63.6 %	+4/=6/−1	1934
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1832
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1817
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1668
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	1792
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1659
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1703
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1795
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1759
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1722
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1797

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1801 · 389 parties · 36.9 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1801± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1913
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1707
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1919
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1814
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	1817
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1578
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1786
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1842
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1647
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1815
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1659
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1715
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1887
Saitek President	1918	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1883
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1804
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1919
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2029
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1557
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1920
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1944
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1864
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1719
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	1935
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1827
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1721
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1703
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1795
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	2008
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1710
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1577
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1797

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer 2100

65C02 6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1792 · 388 parties · 36.0 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1792± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1707
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1789
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1858
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1814
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	2/9	22.2 %	+0/=4/−5	1879
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1578
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1847
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1672
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1661
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1720
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1765
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1731
Saitek President	1918	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1771
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1610
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	1787
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1882
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1894
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	1953
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1455
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1929
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1753
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1766
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1826
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	1846
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1832
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1759
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2069
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1738
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Simultano (ver. B)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1756 · 389 parties · 32.1 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1756± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1714
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1707
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1648
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1604
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1652
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	1/11	9.1 %	+0/=2/−9	1690
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2088	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1897
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2054	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1813
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1722
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1770
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1924
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1814
Saitek President	1918	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1810
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1610
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	1/11	9.1 %	+1/=0/−10	1484
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1641
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1751
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1665
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1689
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	1801
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1709
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	1900
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1836
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1722
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1809
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1724
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2069
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1797

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Par Excellence (B)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1738 · 367 parties · 31.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1738± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1837
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1919
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1596
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1315
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1795
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1993
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	1797
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1659
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1635
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1775
Saitek President	1918	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	1638
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1804
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	1/11	9.1 %	+0/=2/−9	1484
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1774
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1668
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1709
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1535
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	11	2/11	18.2 %	+1/=2/−8	1571
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1817
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1838
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1836
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1685
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1685
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+5/=5/−0	1878
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1675
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1628
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHzturbo

HD6301Y0 125 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 1724 · 150 parties · 51.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo1724± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1786
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1802
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1321
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1746
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1730
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1685
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1791
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1547
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1616
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1758
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2022
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1667

Meilleur : 90 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto MM V (v5.1).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Prisma

H8/325 20 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1724 · 369 parties · 29.7 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1724± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1360
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1804
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1945
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1652
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1715
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1561
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1581
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1579
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	1743
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1814
Saitek President	1918	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1953
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1529
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1919
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1641
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1712
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1709
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1766
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1641
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1746
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1768
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1693
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1757
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1756
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1631
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1540
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1570
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1628
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer 2000

65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1688 · 368 parties · 26.6 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1688± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1648
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1604
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	1843
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1297
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1290
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1816
Novag Zircon II	1963	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+3/=1/−5	1884
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1161
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1886
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1922	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1681
Saitek President	1918	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1617
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1911
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1372
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1561
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1618
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1665
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1900
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1903
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1817
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1768
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1480
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1411
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1374
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+0/=5/−5	1547
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1654
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1871
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1605
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1685
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2085

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super VIP v3.7

HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1640 · 358 parties · 20.5 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1640± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1360
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1315
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1906
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1769
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1517
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1722
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1720
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1156
Saitek President	1918	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1406
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1670
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1714
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1641
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1712
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1615
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1535
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1032
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	9	1/9	11.1 %	+1/=0/−8	1455
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1502
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1730
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1551
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1515
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1703
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1342
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1794
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1722
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1542
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1738
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1667

Meilleur : 90 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03.

↑ retour au classement

Tandy Chess Champion 2150

65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1577 · 356 parties · 17.6 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo1577± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1697
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1360
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1734
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	1/9	11.1 %	+1/=0/−8	1735
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1849
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Novag Zircon II	1963	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	1826
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1161
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1574
Saitek President	1918	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1118
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1670
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1643
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1712
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1668
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1555
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	1773
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1032
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1017
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1801
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1281
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1515
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1497
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1533
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1533
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1580
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1675
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1507
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1586

Meilleur : 85 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach III.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo 16K

HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1437 · 358 parties · 8.0 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo1437± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1360
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1734
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1297
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1578
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1163
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1161
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1444
Saitek President	1918	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1406
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1400
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1084
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1500
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1618
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1344
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1325
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1451
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1435
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1289
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1491
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1374
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1547
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1342
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1533
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1176
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1339
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1507
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1285	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1215

Meilleur : 40 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek Sparc (rev.518).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)

HD6303Y 12 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1285 · 357 parties · 3.5 % · err ±4

Cote Ordo1285± 4

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1697
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2218	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1418
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2171	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1371
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2160	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1360
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2115	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1315
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2098	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1298
Novag Sapphire	2097	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1297
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2090	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1290
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Novag Zircon II	1963	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1163
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1961	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1449
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1156
Saitek President	1918	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1118
Saitek Maestro D++	1911	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1111
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1884	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1084
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1882	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1353
Novag Turquoise	1859	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1059
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1056
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1837	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1037
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1832	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1032
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1817	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1017
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1801	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1289
Fidelity Designer 2100	1792	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	992
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1756	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1244
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1738	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	938
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1724	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1342
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	924
Fidelity Designer 2000	1688	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	888
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1258
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1276
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1507

Meilleur : 60 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Post Views: 986