Performance elo, tournois maison

Classement général · échelle Ordo

Performance Elo — tournois maison

Cotes Ordo (fit global) depuis le PGN du laboratoire : toutes, sans exception, issues de parties jouées. Les moteurs en bleu tournent sous adaptateur Python (ponts eng2uci / shredder2uci) : leur cote est celle de la version adaptée, jamais celle du moteur d'origine. Les machines dédiées sont en vert, en italique lorsqu'elles sont pilotées en UCI et tournent sans bridage. Les portages maison sur machine émulée par MAME sont en violet. Les programmes PC d'époque tournant sur un 486 ou un Pentium émulé, ou sur une carte ChessMachine émulée, sont en brun : ni moteurs UCI natifs, ni machines dédiées, ni créations maison. Cliquer un moteur ✱ fait défiler vers son débrief.

Rang	Moteur / Système	Hardware	Elo	Parties	Err ±
1	✱ Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3850	120	±18
2	✱ Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3834	191	±14
3	✱ Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3829	191	±14
4	✱ Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3818	241	±13
5	✱ Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3808	151	±16
6	✱ Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3797	251	±13
7	✱ Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3796	100	±20
8	✱ Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3777	110	±19
9	✱ Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3776	274	±12
10	✱ Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3739	147	±16
11	✱ Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3698	206	±14
12	✱ Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3693	371	±10
13	✱ Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3668	198	±14
14	✱ Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3654	215	±14
15	✱ Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3652	112	±19
16	✱ Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3635	185	±15
17	✱ Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3622	160	±16
18	✱ Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3621	89	±21
19	✱ Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3596	159	±16
20	✱ Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3594	168	±15
21	✱ Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3593	180	±15
22	✱ Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3588	372	±10
23	✱ Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3585	70	±24
24	✱ rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3553	179	±15
25	✱ Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3533	412	±10
26	✱ Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3517	180	±14
27	✱ Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3483	154	±16
28	✱ Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3476	180	±14
29	✱ Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3466	176	±15
30	✱ Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3427	146	±15
31	✱ Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3410	163	±16
32	✱ Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3409	138	±12
33	✱ Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3403	199	±14
34	✱ Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3351	80	±22
35	✱ Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	ARM9 ARMv5TE 300 MHz — MAME	3329	244	±9
36	✱ Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3324	101	±20
37	✱ Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3317	126	±17
38	✱ Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3316	128	±18
39	✱ Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3310	298	±11
40	✱ Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3236	137	±16
41	✱ Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3185	128	±17
42	✱ Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3177	179	±15
43	✱ Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3172	79	±22
44	✱ Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	3151	238	±9
45	✱ Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3129	466	±9
46	✱ Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3129	192	±14
47	✱ DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3107	137	±17
48	✱ Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3092	90	±21
49	✱ Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3072	371	±10
50	✱ Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3070	163	±16
51	✱ The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3053	128	±17
52	✱ Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3049	138	±17
53	✱ Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3030	138	±17
54	✱ ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3027	227	±13
55	✱ Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3027	138	±17
56	✱ Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3024	202	±13
57	✱ HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3020	386	±10
58	✱ Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3020	143	±16
59	✱ Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3019	727	±7
60	✱ Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	3019	144	±16
61	✱ Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2997	74	±23
62	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2984	99	±20
63	✱ Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2979	940	±6
64	✱ Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2975	214	±13
65	✱ Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2974	103	±19
66	✱ Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2968	498	±9
67	✱ Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2966	90	±21
68	✱ Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2937	60	±26
69	✱ ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2926	919	±7
70	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2925	96	±20
71	✱ Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2919	169	±15
72	✱ Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2916	107	±19
73	✱ Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2912	98	±20
74	✱ Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2909	185	±15
75	✱ Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2906	489	±9
76	✱ Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2904	290	±12
77	✱ Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2897	90	±21
78	✱ Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2892	527	±9
79	✱ Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2878	100	±19
80	✱ Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2877	231	±13
81	✱ The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2875	430	±10
82	✱ Junior 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2874	406	±10
83	✱ Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2872	726	±7
84	✱ Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2871	138	±17
85	✱ Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2866	118	±18
86	✱ Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2860	336	±11
87	✱ Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2859	70	±24
88	✱ Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2858	110	±19
89	✱ Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2857	199	±14
90	✱ Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2857	121	±18
91	✱ THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2855	214	±14
92	✱ Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2848	316	±11
93	✱ THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2843	227	±13
94	✱ Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2841	232	±13
95	✱ Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2840	304	±11
96	✱ Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2840	559	±8
97	✱ Junior 7 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2837	189	±14
98	✱ Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	Apple Silicon M1 Max	2837	686	±8
99	✱ Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	2830	432	±9
100	✱ Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2820	85	±22
101	✱ Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2817	293	±11
102	✱ SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2814	692	±8
103	✱ Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2802	200	±14
104	✱ Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	486DX 33 MHz — MAME	2800	244	±12
105	✱ List 512 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2797	538	±9
106	✱ Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2794	368	±10
107	✱ Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2790	400	±10
108	✱ Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2780	134	±17
109	✱ Stockfish 11 SPARC 20MHz — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2779	150	±11
110	✱ Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2777	245	±13
111	✱ WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2764	193	±14
112	✱ Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2756	261	±12
113	✱ Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2746	171	±15
114	✱ Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2744	195	±14
115	✱ Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2739	126	±18
116	✱ Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2726	569	±8
117	✱ Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2674	660	±7
118	✱ Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	68040 40 MHz — MAME	2609	802	±6
119	✱ Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2576	244	±12
120	✱ Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2576	244	±12
121	✱ Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2569	244	±12
122	✱ Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2563	247	±12
123	✱ CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2543	105	±16
124	✱ Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2531	244	±12
125	✱ Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2511	229	±13
126	✱ The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHzturbo	ChessMachine SR, ARM 140 MHz — cmcard, accélérée	2491	271	±12
127	✱ Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2477	250	±13
128	✱ Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2448	243	±13
129	✱ Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400MHzturbo	ARM2 400 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2440	402	±10
130	✱ Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHzturbo	ChessMachine SR, ARM 150 MHz — cmcard, accélérée	2424	264	±12
131	✱ Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2414	245	±13
132	✱ The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard	2397	268	±12
133	✱ Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME	2391	638	±8
134	✱ MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2386	244	±13
135	✱ Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2377	266	±12
136	✱ Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2375	264	±12
137	✱ Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2373	244	±13
138	✱ Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2364	244	±13
139	✱ Mephisto Genius 68030 London	68EC030 33,3 MHz — cb-emu	2363	932	±6
140	✱ Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	2350	472	±9
141	✱ Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2336	563	±8
142	✱ Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard	2335	265	±12
143	✱ MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2328	249	±12
144	✱ The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard	2327	244	±13
145	✱ Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	68EC020 24,6 MHz — cb-emu	2315	967	±6
146	✱ MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2271	244	±12
147	✱ Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2269	266	±11
148	✱ Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	68040 40 MHz — MAME	2256	604	±8
149	✱ Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2255	528	±9
150	✱ Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2228	244	±12
151	✱ Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	H8S/2312 25 MHz — cb-emu	2226	379	±9
152	✱ Mephisto RISC II	65SC02 2,5 MHz + ARM2 ChessMachine — cb-emu	2225	661	±8
153	✱ Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2224	238	±10
154	✱ Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	2224	244	±13
155	✱ Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2224	244	±12
156	✱ Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2201	309	±11
157	✱ MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2187	574	±8
158	✱ Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	ARM2 14,2 MHz — cb-emu	2181	571	±8
159	✱ Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2180	244	±13
160	✱ Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	SPARClite (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu	2176	538	±8
161	✱ Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	286 1800 MHz — PC émulé	2162	173	±15
162	✱ Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard	2151	277	±12
163	✱ Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	68030 32 MHz — cb-emu	2125	544	±8
164	✱ Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	68000 12,3 MHz — cb-emu	2118	543	±8
165	✱ Novag Sapphire	Clipper C400 12,5 MHz — cb-emu	2098	526	±9
166	✱ Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 %	2097	263	±11
167	✱ Fidelity Designer Mach IV	68EC020 20 MHz — cb-emu	2094	546	±8
168	✱ Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé	2089	244	±12
169	✱ Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73MHzturbo	65C02 73 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2087	257	±12
170	✱ Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME	2080	273	±11
171	✱ Novag Constellation Forte A 91MHzturbo	65C02 91 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	2053	262	±12
172	✱ Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	ARM9 ARMv5TE 300 MHz — MAME	2048	254	±12
173	✱ Fidelity Designer Mach III	68000 16 MHz — cb-emu	2029	505	±9
174	✱ Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	Pentium — PC émulé	2006	343	±11
175	✱ Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	68000 12 MHz — cb-emu	1966	491	±9
176	✱ Novag Zircon II	H8/325 26,6 MHz — cb-emu	1965	480	±9
177	✱ Mephisto Nigel Short	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1956	429	±10
178	✱ Saitek Maestro D++	65C02 (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu	1920	430	±10
179	✱ Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	286 16 MHz — PC émulé	1920	283	±12
180	✱ Novag Super Expert C v3.6	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1880	420	±10
181	✱ Saitek President	6502 2 MHz — cb-emu	1875	424	±10
182	✱ Novag Super Forte C v3.6	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1871	419	±10
183	✱ Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	486DX 33 MHz — MAME	1867	302	±11
184	✱ Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1856	430	±9
185	✱ Novag Turquoise	65C02 (à confirmer) — cb-emu	1855	344	±11
186	✱ Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME	1851	320	±11
187	✱ Mephisto Modena (set 3)	65C02 4,2 MHz — cb-emu	1832	421	±10
188	✱ Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1822	420	±10
189	✱ Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1814	418	±9
190	✱ Novag Constellation Forte A	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1803	410	±10
191	✱ Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu	1788	419	±9
192	✱ Fidelity Designer 2100	65C02 6 MHz — cb-emu	1773	418	±9
193	✱ Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1747	419	±9
194	✱ Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu	1725	397	±9
195	✱ Saitek Prisma	H8/325 20 MHz — cb-emu	1724	399	±9
196	✱ Saitek Turbo 16K 125MHzturbo	HD6301Y0 125 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée	1717	150	±16
197	✱ Fidelity Designer 2000	65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu	1670	398	±9
198	✱ Novag Super VIP v3.7	HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu	1640	378	±8
199	✱ Tandy Chess Champion 2150	65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu	1577	376	±8
200	✱ Saitek Turbo 16K	HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu	1437	368	±6
201	✱ Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	HD6303Y 12 MHz — cb-emu	1232	357	±4

✱ = débrief cliquable · bleu = sous adaptateur Python (18) · vert = machine dédiée sous cb-emu (38) · vert italique = échiquier dédié piloté en UCI, sans bridage (2) · violet = portage maison sur machine émulée MAME (12) · brun = programme PC d'époque sur 486 / Pentium ou carte ChessMachine émulés (35) · 201 moteurs au total

Débriefs · adversaire par adversaire

Débrief de chaque gauntlet

Perf locale = cote Ordo de l'adversaire + 400·log₁₀(p/(1−p)). Sa dispersion reflète la transitivité du moteur. Mêmes couleurs qu'au classement : bleu pour les moteurs sous adaptateur Python, vert pour les machines dédiées, violet pour les portages maison, brun pour les programmes PC d'époque sur 486 / Pentium ou carte ChessMachine émulés.

Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3850 · 120 parties · 57.1 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo3850± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3834
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3829
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3853
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3850
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3924
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3810

Meilleur : 70 % vs Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3834 · 191 parties · 57.6 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3834± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3850
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3829
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3835
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3808
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3814
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	8/15	53.3 %	+1/=14/−0	3800
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3884
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3876
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3867
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3782

Meilleur : 72 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3829 · 191 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3829± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3850
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3834
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3818
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3808
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3832
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3847
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3865
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3852
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3825
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3763

Meilleur : 68 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 20 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3818 · 241 parties · 57.9 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3818± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3815
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3817
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3829
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3808
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3814
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3796	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3814
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+2/=13/−0	3823
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3847
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+5/=11/−0	3852
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3793
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3840
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3724
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3842
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3829

Meilleur : 77 % vs Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3808 · 151 parties · 54.6 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3808± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3834
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3829
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	10/20	50.0 %	+0/=20/−0	3818
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3797
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3777
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	9/16	56.2 %	+2/=14/−0	3783
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3845
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3763

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 50 % vs Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3797 · 251 parties · 55.0 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3797± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3797
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3817
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3794
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3801
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	10/20	50.0 %	+1/=18/−1	3808
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3796	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3761
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3777
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3811
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+1/=15/−0	3761
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3746
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3757
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3894
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3850

Meilleur : 80 % vs Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 42 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3796 · 100 parties · 55.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3796± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3801
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3832
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3829
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3787
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3728

Meilleur : 62 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 48 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3777 · 110 parties · 45.0 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3777± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3703
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	15	7/15	46.7 %	+0/=14/−1	3811
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3759
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+0/=13/−2	3771
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3808
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3797
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	15	9/15	60.0 %	+3/=12/−0	3810

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3777 · 274 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3777± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3727
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3740
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3748
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3762
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3796	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3744
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3801
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	19	13/19	68.4 %	+7/=12/−0	3803
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3761
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3740
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3829
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3794
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3915
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3758
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3858

Meilleur : 90 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 35 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3739 · 147 parties · 42.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3739± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 18 — 8 Threads	3850	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3779
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3697
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3717
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+0/=11/−5	3706
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	16	7/16	43.8 %	+0/=14/−2	3764
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+0/=15/−1	3775
Dragon Komodo — 8 Threads	3777	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3706
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+1/=13/−2	3676
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	16	11/16	68.8 %	+6/=10/−0	3830

Meilleur : 69 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 31 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3698 · 206 parties · 46.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3698± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3666
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3702
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3723
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3661
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3796	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3708
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+2/=13/−1	3761
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3722
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	13	7/13	53.8 %	+1/=12/−0	3679
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	15	8/15	53.3 %	+2/=12/−1	3658
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3717
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	3717
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3683
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+3/=7/−0	3693

Meilleur : 67 % vs Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 28 % vs Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3693 · 371 parties · 52.2 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3693± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Caissa 1.24 — 8 Threads	3834	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3746
Lc0 v0.31.0 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3829	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3759
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3671
Stockfish 12 — 8 Threads	3808	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3737
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3744
Lc0 v0.32.1 RTX 4060 Ti — 1 Thread	3796	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3761
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3669
Fire 9.3 — 8 Threads	3739	16	5/16	31.2 %	+0/=10/−6	3602
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3669
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	13/20	65.0 %	+6/=14/−0	3776
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3619
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	12	7/12	58.3 %	+2/=10/−0	3710
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3635
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3622
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3682
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	32	20/32	62.5 %	+9/=22/−1	3677
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3680
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3680
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	14/20	70.0 %	+8/=12/−0	3664
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+12/=7/−1	3691

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3668 · 198 parties · 56.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3668± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3708
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	19	6/19	31.6 %	+0/=12/−7	3642
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3585
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3671
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3646
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3715
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+8/=11/−0	3709
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3641
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+8/=11/−1	3644
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3745

Meilleur : 82 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3654 · 215 parties · 52.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3654± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	6/15	40.0 %	+0/=12/−3	3748
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3556
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	7/20	35.0 %	+0/=14/−6	3669
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3728
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3651
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3646
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3658
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	11/20	55.0 %	+2/=18/−0	3588
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3603
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3664
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	15.5/20	77.5 %	+11/=9/−0	3691

Meilleur : 78 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3652 · 112 parties · 53.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo3652± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	13	6/13	46.2 %	+0/=12/−1	3671
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	12	5/12	41.7 %	+0/=10/−2	3635
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	3662
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+4/=9/−0	3732
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3621
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+0/=11/−1	3567
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	12	8/12	66.7 %	+4/=8/−0	3714
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+2/=9/−1	3617
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3656

Meilleur : 67 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 42 % vs Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3635 · 185 parties · 48.4 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3635± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3611
Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads	3797	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3582
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	15	7/15	46.7 %	+1/=12/−2	3675
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	12	6/12	50.0 %	+0/=12/−0	3693
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	3625
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3675
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3614
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+2/=17/−1	3611
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+3/=17/−0	3641
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	6/10	60.0 %	+2/=8/−0	3656
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3622

Meilleur : 62 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 22 % vs Rebel-16.3 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3622 · 160 parties · 47.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3622± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 20 — 8 Threads	3818	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3611
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3603
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	12	6/12	50.0 %	+1/=10/−1	3693
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+0/=9/−4	3542
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3583
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3621
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3631
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+4/=15/−1	3646
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3658
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3620

Meilleur : 60 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 23 % vs Fritz 20 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3621 · 89 parties · 53.4 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo3621± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+0/=15/−0	3652
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	15	7.5/15	50.0 %	+1/=13/−1	3622
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	15	8/15	53.3 %	+1/=14/−0	3619
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+4/=11/−0	3689
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+0/=13/−1	3563
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+3/=11/−1	3580

Meilleur : 63 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 46 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3596 · 159 parties · 50.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3596± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	3578
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+1/=11/−0	3681
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3618
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3587
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	15	7/15	46.7 %	+0/=14/−1	3598
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3512
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3588
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3656
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	14	8/14	57.1 %	+3/=10/−1	3583
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	13	9/13	69.2 %	+5/=8/−0	3624
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	13	8/13	61.5 %	+3/=10/−0	3548

Meilleur : 69 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 33 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3594 · 168 parties · 53.0 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3594± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	12	4/12	33.3 %	+0/=8/−4	3532
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+1/=17/−2	3618
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+1/=15/−4	3569
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+0/=11/−4	3526
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3678
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+1/=15/−2	3569
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3550
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3533
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	20	16/20	80.0 %	+12/=8/−0	3724
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+9/=11/−0	3635

Meilleur : 80 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 33 % vs Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3593 · 180 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3593± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3629
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3604
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3616
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3601
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+0/=19/−1	3571
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	12/20	60.0 %	+5/=14/−1	3624
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3603
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+5/=11/−4	3535
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+5/=15/−0	3565

Meilleur : 62 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3588 · 372 parties · 48.7 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3588± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3536
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	3603
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	32	12/32	37.5 %	+1/=22/−9	3604
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3542
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3583
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+1/=9/−2	3623
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+0/=17/−3	3583
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3552
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+1/=13/−0	3646
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	14	7/14	50.0 %	+1/=12/−1	3596
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+2/=15/−1	3613
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+1/=19/−0	3611
Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads	3585	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3550
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3536
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	39	22.5/39	57.7 %	+7/=31/−1	3587
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3588
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	19	14/19	73.7 %	+11/=6/−2	3662
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	12.5/20	62.5 %	+6/=13/−1	3565
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+9/=9/−1	3622

Meilleur : 74 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel-Extreme-1.1 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3585 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo3585± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads	3698	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+0/=7/−3	3591
Komodo 12.1.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3652	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3582
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	10	4/10	40.0 %	+0/=8/−2	3565
Stockfish 8 64 — 8 Threads	3622	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	3587
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3526
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3629
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	3623

Meilleur : 55 % vs Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 35 % vs Wasp 7.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3553 · 179 parties · 42.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3553± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3536
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3566
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+0/=11/−8	3513
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	9/20	45.0 %	+0/=18/−2	3619
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	8/20	40.0 %	+1/=14/−5	3523
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3605
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3533
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	11/20	55.0 %	+5/=12/−3	3552
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3529

Meilleur : 57 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3533 · 412 parties · 51.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3533± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3395
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3546
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3561
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3583
Caissa 1.5 — 8 Threads	3635	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3546
Houdini 5.01 — 8 Threads	3621	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+1/=11/−3	3575
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	14	6/14	42.9 %	+1/=10/−3	3546
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3594
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3523
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	39	16.5/39	42.3 %	+1/=31/−7	3534
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	10/20	50.0 %	+3/=14/−3	3553
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	12/20	60.0 %	+4/=16/−0	3588
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	25	13.5/25	54.0 %	+5/=17/−3	3511
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	11/20	55.0 %	+3/=16/−1	3511
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	20	12/20	60.0 %	+6/=12/−2	3537
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	3537
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+7/=13/−0	3530
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3594
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	19	14.5/19	76.3 %	+10/=9/−0	3521
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	20	18/20	90.0 %	+16/=4/−0	3692

Meilleur : 90 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3517 · 180 parties · 37.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3517± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3536
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	6/20	30.0 %	+0/=12/−8	3546
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+1/=11/−8	3542
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3506
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+4/=11/−5	3576
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3518
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	9/20	45.0 %	+3/=12/−5	3518
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	8/20	40.0 %	+0/=16/−4	3463
Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads	3476	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3476

Meilleur : 50 % vs Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3483 · 154 parties · 47.7 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3483± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	13	4/13	30.8 %	+0/=8/−5	3455
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	20	4/20	20.0 %	+0/=8/−12	3353
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	19	5/19	26.3 %	+2/=6/−11	3409
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	25	11.5/25	46.0 %	+3/=17/−5	3505
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	26	13.5/26	51.9 %	+5/=17/−4	3480
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	26	18/26	69.2 %	+11/=14/−1	3551
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	25	17.5/25	70.0 %	+11/=13/−1	3550

Meilleur : 70 % vs Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 20 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Defenchess 2.2 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3476 · 180 parties · 31.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3476± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads	3777	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3395
Komodo 14.1 64-bit — 8 Threads	3693	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+1/=7/−12	3478
Fire 8 x64 — 8 Threads	3668	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3399
Ethereal 12.75 — 8 Threads	3654	20	4.5/20	22.5 %	+0/=9/−11	3439
Xiphos 0.6 — 8 Threads	3593	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+0/=15/−5	3504
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	20	7.5/20	37.5 %	+1/=13/−6	3499
rofChade 2.3 — 8 Threads	3553	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3501
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	9/20	45.0 %	+1/=16/−3	3498
Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads	3517	20	10/20	50.0 %	+2/=16/−2	3517

Meilleur : 50 % vs Laser 1.7 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3466 · 176 parties · 48.3 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3466± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Ethereal 11.75 — 8 Threads	3596	13	5/13	38.5 %	+0/=10/−3	3515
Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads	3594	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+0/=11/−9	3425
Booot 6.5_x64 — 8 Threads	3588	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+1/=9/−9	3432
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	8/20	40.0 %	+2/=12/−6	3463
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	26	12.5/26	48.1 %	+4/=17/−5	3470
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+6/=11/−1	3526
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3463
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	20	11/20	55.0 %	+6/=10/−4	3438
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	3486

Meilleur : 72 % vs Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 28 % vs Wasp 5.50 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3427 · 146 parties · 67.8 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3427± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+1/=11/−6	3367
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+5/=9/−6	3393
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+2/=13/−3	3384
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+6/=11/−1	3416
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	18	13.5/18	75.0 %	+9/=9/−0	3501
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	18	16/18	88.9 %	+14/=4/−0	3538
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	18	16.5/18	91.7 %	+15/=3/−0	3468
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	18	17/18	94.4 %	+16/=2/−0	3471

Meilleur : 94 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread · plus dur : 36 % vs Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3410 · 163 parties · 51.5 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3410± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	3406
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	26	8/26	30.8 %	+1/=14/−11	3342
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3414
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+6/=9/−5	3444
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+1/=9/−3	3349
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	3383
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	3399
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	3525
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	13	9/13	69.2 %	+6/=6/−1	3451
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	13	11/13	84.6 %	+9/=4/−0	3473

Meilleur : 85 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 31 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3409 · 138 parties · 84.4 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo3409± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	3293
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3447
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3373
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3375
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3384
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3361
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3542
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3849
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3499
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3496
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3364
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3358
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3490
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3357
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3356
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3779
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3674
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3556

Meilleur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3403 · 199 parties · 51.3 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3403± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+0/=13/−7	3406
Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads	3483	25	7.5/25	30.0 %	+1/=13/−11	3336
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	20	9/20	45.0 %	+4/=10/−6	3432
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+3/=13/−2	3446
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+3/=9/−1	3464
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3351	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3368
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	3403
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+10/=17/−3	3400
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	29	17/29	58.6 %	+7/=20/−2	3376
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+6/=9/−0	3457

Meilleur : 70 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 30 % vs Houdini 4 Pro x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3351 · 80 parties · 56.2 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3351± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3386
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+5/=13/−2	3377
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3310
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	20	14/20	70.0 %	+9/=10/−1	3324

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 48 % vs Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU

ARM9 ARMv5TE 300 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 3328 · 244 parties · 84.4 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo3328± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	3444
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	3275
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	10	7/10	70.0 %	+4/=6/−0	3383
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3332
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3950
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3276
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3254
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	3373
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3560
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	3136
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	3408
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3217
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	3324
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	3321
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3167
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	3401
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	3259
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3705
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3658
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3627
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3591
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3346
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 95 % vs Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3324 · 101 parties · 44.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo3324± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	3264
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	3352
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	3324
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3351	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+2/=13/−5	3298
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3317
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	3386
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	3380
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3324

Meilleur : 70 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 18 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3317 · 126 parties · 36.5 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3317± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	19	4.5/19	23.7 %	+0/=9/−10	3330
Gull 3 x64 — 8 Threads	3466	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	3298
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+1/=11/−6	3328
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	3329
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+3/=17/−10	3320
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	3324
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3310

Meilleur : 50 % vs Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 24 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3316 · 128 parties · 57.4 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3316± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	3201
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	29	12/29	41.4 %	+2/=20/−7	3342
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	3254
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3310
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+9/=5/−1	3384
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	15	12.5/15	83.3 %	+10/=5/−0	3409
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+8/=7/−0	3336
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	15	11/15	73.3 %	+8/=6/−1	3246

Meilleur : 83 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 23 % vs Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3310 · 298 parties · 60.1 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo3310± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads	3533	20	2/20	10.0 %	+0/=4/−16	3151
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	4.5/18	25.0 %	+0/=9/−9	3236
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	13	4/13	30.8 %	+1/=6/−6	3269
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3272
Wasp 3.75 — 8 Threads	3403	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+0/=9/−6	3256
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3351	20	10/20	50.0 %	+6/=8/−6	3351
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	3363
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	3254
Naum 4.2 — 8 Threads	3317	16	8/16	50.0 %	+3/=10/−3	3317
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	16	8/16	50.0 %	+2/=12/−2	3316
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3373
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3185
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	16	13/16	81.2 %	+11/=4/−1	3432
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3384
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	16	12.5/16	78.1 %	+11/=3/−2	3350
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3445
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3542
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3387
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3499
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3217
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3281
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3211
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3820
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3274
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3356
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3317
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3674
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3556

Meilleur : 81 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads · plus dur : 10 % vs Deep Shredder 13 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3236 · 137 parties · 67.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3236± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3272
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3/10	30.0 %	+0/=6/−4	3181
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3173
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3322
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	3218
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3195
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3409
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3186
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3166
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3217
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3217
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3490
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3274
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3156
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3272
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3317
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3065
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3556

Meilleur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3185 · 128 parties · 60.9 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3185± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	3218
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3181
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3310
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3099
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	3129
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	3209
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	3130
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3387
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	3166
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3026
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	3128
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3157
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	3122
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3210
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3272
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3259
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3674
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3227

Meilleur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3177 · 179 parties · 42.7 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo3177± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	2/18	11.1 %	+0/=4/−14	3066
Critter 1.6a 64-bit — 8 Threads	3410	13	2/13	15.4 %	+0/=4/−9	3114
Dark Toga 0.3.12 JA — 8 Threads	3351	20	6/20	30.0 %	+1/=10/−9	3204
Senpai 2.0 — 8 Threads	3324	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3177
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+1/=5/−9	3109
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	16	3/16	18.8 %	+1/=4/−11	3055
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3172	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+3/=15/−2	3189
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	16	9/16	56.2 %	+4/=10/−2	3173
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	17	10.5/17	61.8 %	+6/=9/−2	3212
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+11/=5/−1	3305
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+10/=7/−0	3254

Meilleur : 79 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 11 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3172 · 79 parties · 56.3 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo3172± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+2/=15/−3	3160
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	20	13/20	65.0 %	+7/=12/−1	3237
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+9/=5/−6	3182
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+5/=11/−3	3107

Meilleur : 65 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 48 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 3150 · 238 parties · 84.9 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo3150± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3069
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3213
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3358
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3436
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	3139
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3209
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	3037
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3163
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3117
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3162
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3160
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3170
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3292
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3154
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2992
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2928
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	3099
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3327
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3046
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3126
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3030
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3309
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3018
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2982
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3346
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 80 % vs Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 80 % vs Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3129 · 466 parties · 59.7 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo3129± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	3154
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3181
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	15	2.5/15	16.7 %	+0/=5/−10	3036
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	3055
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	3147
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	3185
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	16	7/16	43.8 %	+2/=10/−4	3133
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3172	20	7/20	35.0 %	+1/=12/−7	3064
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	15	8/15	53.3 %	+5/=6/−4	3152
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3244
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	3092	30	18.5/30	61.7 %	+11/=15/−4	3174
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	48	26.5/48	55.2 %	+16/=21/−11	3108
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+5/=9/−1	3165
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3137
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3072
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3163
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3364
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	48	29/48	60.4 %	+20/=18/−10	3093
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3156
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	24	15/24	62.5 %	+9/=12/−3	3108
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	4/8	50.0 %	+0/=8/−0	3018
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2983	20	12/20	60.0 %	+7/=10/−3	3054
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	23	18/23	78.3 %	+14/=8/−1	3202
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2966	18	14/18	77.8 %	+11/=6/−1	3183
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3206
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2925	20	13/20	65.0 %	+12/=2/−6	3032
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2911	19	16/19	84.2 %	+14/=4/−1	3202
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2877	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+13/=7/−0	3147
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2963
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3665
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3556

Meilleur : 84 % vs Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads · plus dur : 17 % vs Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3129 · 192 parties · 50.8 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo3129± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+0/=7/−8	3109
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	16	3.5/16	21.9 %	+2/=3/−11	3089
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	17	6.5/17	38.2 %	+2/=9/−6	3094
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3172	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+6/=5/−9	3119
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	15	7/15	46.7 %	+4/=6/−5	3106
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	3092	30	15/30	50.0 %	+7/=16/−7	3092
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	3070
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	3187
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+9/=9/−2	3106
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	20	16/20	80.0 %	+14/=4/−2	3167

Meilleur : 80 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 22 % vs Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3107 · 137 parties · 51.8 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3107± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	3154
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3181
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2972
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	3147
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	3082
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2992
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3262
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3186
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	3118
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3163
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3069
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	3063
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3274
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3210
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2929
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2890
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3065
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3011

Meilleur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3092 · 90 parties · 51.7 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo3092± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	30	11.5/30	38.3 %	+4/=15/−11	3047
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	30	15/30	50.0 %	+7/=16/−7	3129
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	30	20/30	66.7 %	+14/=12/−4	3099

Meilleur : 67 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3071 · 371 parties · 55.0 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3071± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2938
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	3027
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2840
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2898
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	3126
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	48	21.5/48	44.8 %	+11/=21/−16	3093
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2916
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3049
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3118
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3163
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3069
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	48	26/48	54.2 %	+15/=22/−11	3049
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3020
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	46	28/46	60.9 %	+15/=26/−5	3096
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2974
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	44	32/44	72.7 %	+23/=18/−3	3149
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	39	23.5/39	60.3 %	+17/=13/−9	3039
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	38	28/38	73.7 %	+22/=12/−4	3070
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3065
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3227

Meilleur : 74 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 15 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Loop M1-T — 4 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3070 · 163 parties · 48.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3070± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Wasp 2.00 — 8 Threads	3316	15	4/15	26.7 %	+1/=6/−8	3140
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+1/=5/−11	2942
Fritz 13 SE — 1 Thread	3172	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+3/=11/−5	3135
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+1/=9/−5	3034
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	19	9.5/19	50.0 %	+4/=11/−4	3129
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	17	9/17	52.9 %	+5/=8/−4	3039
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2997	24	15/24	62.5 %	+11/=8/−5	3086
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	19	11/19	57.9 %	+7/=8/−4	3034
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	3069

Meilleur : 69 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

The King 3.50 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3052 · 128 parties · 64.8 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3052± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	1.5/18	8.3 %	+0/=3/−15	3010
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2832
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	3019
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	5	3/5	60.0 %	+3/=0/−2	3049
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	6	3/6	50.0 %	+0/=6/−0	2973
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	3056
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3308
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3184
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3273
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3066
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3256
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3208
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	2979
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2976
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3133
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3646
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2841
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3221
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2975
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	2934
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3080
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3135
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3585
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+3/=1/−1	2922
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3143
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3012

Meilleur : 8 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads · plus dur : 8 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3049 · 138 parties · 44.2 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3049± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2609
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2817
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2972
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	3099
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2847
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	3040
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2970
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3071
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2985
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	3115
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	3115
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3275
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3210
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3108
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	3061
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2890
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2963
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3094

Meilleur : 5 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 5 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3029 · 138 parties · 41.7 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3029± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2938
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	3221
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2840
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3099
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	3048
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	3085
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	3018
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2982
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3092
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2889
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3069
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3109
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2765
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3063
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3061
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2979
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3065
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3011

Meilleur : 35 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 35 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3026 · 138 parties · 41.3 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo3026± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2938
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2947
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	3119
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	3045
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3185
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2992
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2970
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2934
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2960
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	3166
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3115
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2931
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2931
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3063
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3018
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2979
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3065
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3094

Meilleur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3026 · 227 parties · 63.4 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3026± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	3071
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	3137
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	3055
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	3045
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	3082
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	3106
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2791
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	3063
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	3028
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2960
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2985
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2937
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3109
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3063
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+0/=7/−1	2975
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2974
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2890
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3096
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2963
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3658
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3018
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2982
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3011
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3346
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3022 · 202 parties · 67.3 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo3022± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	3027
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2959
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3243
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2899
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2979
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2903
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3252
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	3087
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3206
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2787
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2948
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3229
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3101
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3100
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3252
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2960
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3167
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3045
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	5	4.5/5	90.0 %	+4/=1/−0	3228
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3000
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2910
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	3009
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2916
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	7/8	87.5 %	+7/=0/−1	3139
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3585
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3029
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2863
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2863
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3012

Meilleur : 73 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 15 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3020 · 386 parties · 47.2 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo3020± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	3071
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	3027
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	3119
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2766
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	3048
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2812
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	48	19/48	39.6 %	+10/=18/−20	3056
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	3063
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	48	22/48	45.8 %	+11/=22/−15	3042
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2794
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2940
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3115
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2937
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3108
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	48	24/48	50.0 %	+16/=16/−16	3019
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3106
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	44	26.5/44	60.2 %	+17/=19/−8	3051
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	40	20.5/40	51.2 %	+13/=15/−12	2976
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	40	24.5/40	61.3 %	+15/=19/−6	2970
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3212
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3227

Meilleur : 61 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 15 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3020 · 143 parties · 40.2 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3020± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2938
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	3181
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2510
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2981
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	3082
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2733
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2992
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2852
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	3071
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2858
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3284
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3115
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2982
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2931
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2975
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	3106
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3170
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3212
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3011

Meilleur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 30 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3019 · 727 parties · 56.3 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo3019± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	3071
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2947
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	3055
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	3099
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2994
Rybka 2.4 mp 32-bit — 8 Threads	3177	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+0/=7/−10	2942
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	3030
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	24	9/24	37.5 %	+3/=12/−9	3040
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2961
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2916
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	46	18/46	39.1 %	+5/=26/−15	2994
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	17	8/17	47.1 %	+4/=8/−5	3050
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	3052
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2960
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2985
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2982
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+1/=7/−0	3069
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	3143
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	48	24/48	50.0 %	+16/=16/−16	3020
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3063
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3061
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2997	25	12/25	48.0 %	+8/=8/−9	2983
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2983	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	3020
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	38	22.5/38	59.2 %	+15/=15/−8	3044
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2973
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3772
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	24	15/24	62.5 %	+10/=10/−4	3056
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2966	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+5/=7/−4	2987
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	36	21.5/36	59.7 %	+14/=15/−7	2994
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2925	20	13.5/20	67.5 %	+11/=5/−4	3052
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3110
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3106
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2911	20	14/20	70.0 %	+12/=4/−4	3058
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3133
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	3007
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+3/=5/−0	3028
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2877	20	13/20	65.0 %	+8/=10/−2	2985
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2910
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	3185
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3061
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+10/=9/−1	3034
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+5/=5/−0	3049
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3047
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3110
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2889
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3126
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+7/=1/−1	3121
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2883
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	3070
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2916
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2801
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2988
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2887
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3575
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3574
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3011
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3550
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3526
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	3056

Meilleur : 90 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 10 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 3018 · 144 parties · 39.9 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo3018± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	3071
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	3087
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2972
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2981
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2930
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2959
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	4/8	50.0 %	+0/=8/−0	3129
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	3195
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	3115
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	3005
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2985
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3026
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	3069
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2931
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2931
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2975
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2788
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2963
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3094

Meilleur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 10 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2997 · 74 parties · 46.6 % · err ±23

Cote Ordo2997± 23

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	24	9/24	37.5 %	+5/=8/−11	2981
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	25	13/25	52.0 %	+9/=8/−8	3033
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2979

Meilleur : 52 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Loop M1-T — 4 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2983 · 99 parties · 49.5 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2983± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	20	8/20	40.0 %	+3/=10/−7	3059
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2982
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+6/=9/−5	2996
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2926
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	20	12/20	60.0 %	+8/=8/−4	2961

Meilleur : 60 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2979 · 940 parties · 55.8 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo2979± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads	3427	18	1/18	5.6 %	+0/=2/−16	2935
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2609
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2972
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2898
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2905
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	3092
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	23	5/23	21.7 %	+1/=8/−14	2907
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+2/=9/−9	3002
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	3195
Toga II 1.4 beta5c — 8 Threads	3092	30	10/30	33.3 %	+4/=12/−14	2971
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	44	12/44	27.3 %	+3/=18/−23	2901
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	19	8/19	42.1 %	+4/=8/−7	3015
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	2/5	40.0 %	+2/=0/−3	2981
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	3137
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	3029
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	3026
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	3115
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	3022
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	44	17.5/44	39.8 %	+8/=19/−17	2948
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2829
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	38	15.5/38	40.8 %	+8/=15/−15	2954
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3209
Fritz 10 — 1 Thread	2997	25	12.5/25	50.0 %	+6/=13/−6	2997
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2983	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+5/=9/−6	2966
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	3062
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	3093
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	22	11.5/22	52.3 %	+10/=3/−9	2983
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2966	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+7/=5/−6	2985
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	43	25.5/43	59.3 %	+15/=21/−7	2991
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2925	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	3116
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2974
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2911	20	11.5/20	57.5 %	+8/=7/−5	2964
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	3009
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	3011
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2877	20	13/20	65.0 %	+9/=8/−3	2985
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2914
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	3006
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	3099
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	60	39.5/60	65.8 %	+30/=19/−11	2986
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2679
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	20	15/20	75.0 %	+13/=4/−3	3056
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2859	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	3018
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2979
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2964
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2977
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2944
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3192
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	27	17/27	63.0 %	+13/=8/−6	2938
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3312
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	3030
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	45	30/45	66.7 %	+23/=14/−8	2959
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	56	38/56	67.9 %	+24/=28/−4	2966
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2891
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	30	22.5/30	75.0 %	+17/=11/−2	3005
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3217
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2606
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	3255
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	3054
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3574
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3094
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3550
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2863
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2782

Meilleur : 79 % vs Junior 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 6 % vs Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2973 · 214 parties · 64.5 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2973± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	6	3/6	50.0 %	+0/=6/−0	3052
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	3093
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	3019
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2890
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3163
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3193
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2806
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	3/6	50.0 %	+2/=2/−2	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3705
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2980
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2925
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2953
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	7	4/7	57.1 %	+1/=6/−0	2920
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	10	7/10	70.0 %	+4/=6/−0	3005
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2977
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3015
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2932
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2726
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2962
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	7/9	77.8 %	+5/=4/−0	3057
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2993
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3069
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2664
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2886
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	6	5/6	83.3 %	+5/=0/−1	3064
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	3029
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3088
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3064
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2929

Meilleur : 71 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 70 % vs Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2972 · 103 parties · 64.1 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2972± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2959
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2743
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2219
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2859
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2783
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3158
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3117
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3170
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3674
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3196
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3135
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2854
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3184
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3032
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2839
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3638
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2814
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2801
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3113
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2965
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3006
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3012

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2967 · 498 parties · 59.4 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2967± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	39	15.5/39	39.7 %	+9/=13/−17	2999
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2963
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2902
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	40	19.5/40	48.8 %	+12/=15/−13	3011
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	24	9/24	37.5 %	+4/=10/−10	2930
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	22	10.5/22	47.7 %	+9/=3/−10	2963
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2748
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2781
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	24	13.5/24	56.2 %	+9/=9/−6	2970
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2760
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3216
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2935
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2817
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	8	5/8	62.5 %	+5/=0/−3	2963
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	60	36.5/60	60.8 %	+27/=19/−14	2948
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2995
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3047
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2993
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3654
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	23	14.5/23	63.0 %	+13/=3/−7	2939
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2891
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	3030
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	25	18.5/25	74.0 %	+15/=7/−3	3020
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	56	34.5/56	61.6 %	+25/=19/−12	2918
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	23	15/23	65.2 %	+12/=6/−5	2923
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2938
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	19	13.5/19	71.1 %	+11/=5/−3	2953
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3096
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3575
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3574
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3088
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	3172
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3474

Meilleur : 74 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 38 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2966 · 90 parties · 47.2 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2966± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	18	4/18	22.2 %	+1/=6/−11	2911
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+4/=7/−5	2997
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+6/=5/−7	2960
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	19	11.5/19	60.5 %	+7/=9/−3	3000
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	19	11/19	57.9 %	+9/=4/−6	2946

Meilleur : 61 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 22 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2937 · 60 parties · 56.7 % · err ±26

Cote Ordo2937± 26

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	15	10/15	66.7 %	+7/=6/−2	3046
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	15	5/15	33.3 %	+3/=4/−8	2798
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+6/=7/−2	2968
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2933

Meilleur : 67 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 33 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2926 · 919 parties · 55.7 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2926± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2959
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2850
Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads	3129	20	4/20	20.0 %	+2/=4/−14	2888
Loop M1-T — 4 Threads	3070	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2928
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2670
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2743
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	36	14.5/36	40.3 %	+7/=15/−14	2951
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2983	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2983
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	43	17.5/43	40.7 %	+7/=21/−15	2914
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	3094
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2781
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	24	10.5/24	43.8 %	+6/=9/−9	2923
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2966	19	7.5/19	39.5 %	+3/=9/−7	2891
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2937	15	5/15	33.3 %	+2/=6/−7	2816
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2925	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+5/=9/−4	2944
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2894
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2974
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2911	20	9/20	45.0 %	+7/=4/−9	2876
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2966
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	38	22/38	57.9 %	+16/=12/−10	2960
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	33	15/33	45.5 %	+11/=8/−14	2872
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	5/9	55.6 %	+1/=8/−0	2930
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2877	20	12/20	60.0 %	+9/=6/−5	2948
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3675
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	3021
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	47	28/47	59.6 %	+22/=12/−13	2941
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	60	35.5/60	59.2 %	+27/=17/−16	2936
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2972
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2859	14	8/14	57.1 %	+7/=2/−5	2909
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2893
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2892
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3136
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2976
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2897
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	26	15/26	57.7 %	+12/=6/−8	2900
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	3007
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	34	19.5/34	57.4 %	+13/=13/−8	2891
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2976
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	25	18/25	72.0 %	+15/=6/−4	3003
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	56	36.5/56	65.2 %	+26/=21/−9	2945
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2855
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	55	35/55	63.6 %	+28/=14/−13	2911
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3601
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	50	35.5/50	71.0 %	+26/=19/−5	2952
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2875
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2944
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2882
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2863
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3088
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2981
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2794

Meilleur : 72 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 20 % vs Glaurung 2.2 JA — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2925 · 96 parties · 41.1 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2925± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	20	7/20	35.0 %	+6/=2/−12	3022
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	20	6.5/20	32.5 %	+4/=5/−11	2892
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2788
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+4/=9/−5	2907
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	18	12.5/18	69.4 %	+8/=9/−1	3034

Meilleur : 69 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2919 · 169 parties · 58.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2919± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2828
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2937	15	10/15	66.7 %	+8/=4/−3	3057
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2951
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2873
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2904
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2859	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2834
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2927
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+9/=1/−5	2933
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2836
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2820
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	20	14.5/20	72.5 %	+11/=7/−2	2982
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2899
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2984

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 46 % vs Deep Fritz — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2915 · 107 parties · 55.6 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2915± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	3052
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2921
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2973
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2868
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2866
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2845
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3049
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2854
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	3017
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2650
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2839
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	3070
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	12	7/12	58.3 %	+4/=6/−2	2872
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2988
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2775
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3526
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3474

Meilleur : 79 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 42 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threadspont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2911 · 98 parties · 39.8 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2911± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	19	3/19	15.8 %	+1/=4/−14	2838
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	20	6/20	30.0 %	+4/=4/−12	2872
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	8.5/20	42.5 %	+5/=7/−8	2926
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	20	11/20	55.0 %	+9/=4/−7	2961
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2928

Meilleur : 55 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 16 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2907 · 185 parties · 54.9 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2907± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2895
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	3052
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	4/6	66.7 %	+2/=4/−0	3143
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2793
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2877
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	6	3/6	50.0 %	+2/=2/−2	2973
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	3114
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2868
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2758
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2891
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+1/=1/−3	2728
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2874
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2788
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3047
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	3/6	50.0 %	+1/=4/−1	2856
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	8	5/8	62.5 %	+2/=6/−0	2943
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2983
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3641
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2781
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2768
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	3260
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	3026
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2797
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2735
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2833
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2917
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	2900

Meilleur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2905 · 489 parties · 61.7 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2905± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2895
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2772
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2835
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2979
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2917
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2979
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	2173
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2656
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	38	16/38	42.1 %	+10/=12/−16	2871
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	3054
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	34	17.5/34	51.5 %	+7/=21/−6	2914
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2841
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3187
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2995
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	33	18.5/33	56.1 %	+14/=9/−10	2916
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2799
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2897
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2856
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2912
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3072
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2900
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	33	22.5/33	68.2 %	+15/=15/−3	2972
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2781
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	2873
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+6/=5/−2	2937
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	40	24.5/40	61.3 %	+17/=15/−8	2894
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2801
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	36	22/36	61.1 %	+17/=10/−9	2875
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2601
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2785
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	5	4/5	80.0 %	+4/=0/−1	3015
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3574
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+2/=5/−1	2770
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2794
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3346
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2571
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 68 % vs Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 42 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2904 · 290 parties · 57.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2904± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	33	18/33	54.5 %	+14/=8/−11	2958
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	34	16.5/34	48.5 %	+6/=21/−7	2895
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	48	23/48	47.9 %	+16/=14/−18	2859
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	49	27.5/49	56.1 %	+19/=17/−13	2882
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	15	10/15	66.7 %	+6/=8/−1	2959
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	48	32/48	66.7 %	+24/=16/−8	2934
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	48	29/48	60.4 %	+23/=12/−13	2870
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	15	12/15	80.0 %	+9/=6/−0	2986

Meilleur : 80 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 48 % vs Junior 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2897 · 90 parties · 60.6 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2897± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2900
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2898
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	13	8/13	61.5 %	+4/=8/−1	2920
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+7/=3/−3	2947
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	3023
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2879
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2719

Meilleur : 77 % vs SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread · plus dur : 46 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2891 · 527 parties · 47.9 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2891± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2870
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	38	10/38	26.3 %	+4/=12/−22	2892
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2670
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2684
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	40	15.5/40	38.8 %	+6/=19/−15	2940
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+0/=5/−3	2882
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 8 Threads	2983	20	8/20	40.0 %	+4/=8/−8	2913
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2859
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2885
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2693
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2923
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 8 Threads	2966	19	8/19	42.1 %	+6/=4/−9	2910
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	9	4/9	44.4 %	+0/=8/−1	2887
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 4 Threads	2925	18	5.5/18	30.6 %	+1/=9/−8	2782
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2940
Deep Junior 10 UCI py — 4 Threads	2911	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2875
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2955
Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2877	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2877
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2996
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+2/=5/−0	2976
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	60	32.5/60	54.2 %	+21/=23/−16	2901
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	3061
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+3/=3/−3	2858
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2736
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2753
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2904
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3005
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2912
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2750
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+2/=7/−0	2917
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	55	33.5/55	60.9 %	+22/=23/−10	2913
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2725
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2938
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2797
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3064
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2813
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2750
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2863
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	3035

Meilleur : 61 % vs Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread · plus dur : 26 % vs Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2877 · 100 parties · 35.5 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2877± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+0/=7/−13	2860
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	20	7/20	35.0 %	+2/=10/−8	2911
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	7/20	35.0 %	+3/=8/−9	2871
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	20	8/20	40.0 %	+5/=6/−9	2856
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	20	10/20	50.0 %	+7/=6/−7	2891

Meilleur : 50 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 18 % vs Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2875 · 231 parties · 50.6 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2875± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2733
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2861
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2797
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2984
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2940
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2923
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	3025
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	2126
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+3/=1/−1	3054
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2594
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2770
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2816
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2959
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2897
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2945
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2665
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	3192
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2796
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2806
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	4/8	50.0 %	+1/=6/−1	2839
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	13	8/13	61.5 %	+6/=4/−3	2920
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2924
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2814
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2801
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2917
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	3201
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2775
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2894
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2941
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2967
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2929

Meilleur : 80 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

The King 3.50 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2874 · 430 parties · 47.1 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2874± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2609
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2510
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	3045
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2385
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2870
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	3040
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2916
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2880
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2670
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2960
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2838
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2835
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2937
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2797
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2682
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2681
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2708
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2929
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2847
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2895
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2172
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	3/8	37.5 %	+3/=0/−5	2878
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	2779
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2944
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2784
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+0/=5/−2	2789
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2934
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	60	34/60	56.7 %	+25/=18/−17	2918
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	5	2.5/5	50.0 %	+1/=3/−1	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2897
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2926
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	2574
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+2/=5/−0	2948
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	3007
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	6/9	66.7 %	+3/=6/−0	2960
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+4/=5/−5	2814
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	53	27.5/53	51.9 %	+18/=19/−16	2849
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+3/=5/−3	2827
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3040
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	6/8	75.0 %	+6/=0/−2	2991
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3076
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	3039
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2895
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2894
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2636
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3550
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+3/=5/−1	2805
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2915

Meilleur : 80 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 14 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2873 · 406 parties · 52.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2873± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2753
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2937	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+2/=7/−6	2842
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	47	19/47	40.4 %	+13/=12/−22	2859
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2919
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	33	14.5/33	43.9 %	+10/=9/−14	2862
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	48	25/48	52.1 %	+18/=14/−16	2918
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	6/13	46.2 %	+3/=6/−4	2870
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2935
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	33	18/33	54.5 %	+14/=8/−11	2871
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2814
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	55	33/55	60.0 %	+26/=14/−15	2884
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	56	37/56	66.1 %	+31/=12/−13	2913
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	28	15/28	53.6 %	+10/=10/−8	2818
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2866
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2823
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2860

Meilleur : 66 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2872 · 726 parties · 49.4 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2872± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	3030
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	60	20.5/60	34.2 %	+11/=19/−30	2865
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	60	23.5/60	39.2 %	+14/=19/−27	2891
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	60	24.5/60	40.8 %	+16/=17/−27	2862
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	60	27.5/60	45.8 %	+16/=23/−21	2862
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	60	26/60	43.3 %	+17/=18/−25	2827
Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread	2836	410	228/410	55.6 %	+117/=222/−71	2875
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2974

Meilleur : 70 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 34 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2870 · 138 parties · 48.2 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2870± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	3092
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2714
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2641
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3170
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	7	3/7	42.9 %	+0/=6/−1	2923
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2967
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2824
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2975
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2700
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2787
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	5	2.5/5	50.0 %	+1/=3/−1	2874
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2858
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2735
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2943
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2896
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2841
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2839
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2888
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2763
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2903
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2991
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2797
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2505
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3054
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2965
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3550
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2846
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2954

Meilleur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2865 · 118 parties · 50.0 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2865± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2329
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+1/=9/−10	2851
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	20	5/20	25.0 %	+3/=4/−13	2788
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2880
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2798
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	2014
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+4/=3/−2	2875
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2914
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	9	7/9	77.8 %	+6/=2/−1	2963
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	3046
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	9	7/9	77.8 %	+7/=0/−2	2957
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2834

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Deep Fritz — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2859 · 70 parties · 44.3 % · err ±24

Cote Ordo2859± 24

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2820
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	14	6/14	42.9 %	+5/=2/−7	2876
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2944
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+4/=7/−3	2865
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	14	6/14	42.9 %	+3/=6/−5	2789

Meilleur : 54 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 29 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2858 · 336 parties · 58.3 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2858± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2909
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2931
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2920
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+0/=5/−5	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2859
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	10	3/10	30.0 %	+0/=6/−4	2826
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2634
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2830
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2891
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2724
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2978
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2866
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+3/=3/−3	2891
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2837
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2835
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2870
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3656
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2958
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2854
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2983
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+2/=5/−2	2841
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2878
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	13	6/13	46.2 %	+1/=10/−2	2812
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	13	9/13	69.2 %	+8/=2/−3	2968
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2775
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2722
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2641
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2606
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3591
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+0/=3/−2	2637
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2818
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2894
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2941
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2765
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	6/8	75.0 %	+4/=4/−0	2865
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3346
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2714
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2660
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2575
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2533
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 69 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 20 % vs Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2857 · 121 parties · 51.2 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2857± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2871
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2891
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2848
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2795
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2792
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2836
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2891
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	10	6/10	60.0 %	+3/=6/−1	2884
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2797
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	29	19/29	65.5 %	+15/=8/−6	2905

Meilleur : 66 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2856 · 110 parties · 48.2 % · err ±19

Cote Ordo2856± 19

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2680
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	3022
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2859
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2853
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2776
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2646
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2716
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	3011
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2787
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2874
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2058
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2856
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2733
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2967
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3121
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2719
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2959
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2924
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2814
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2801
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2775
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3029
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3526
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2865

Meilleur : 64 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 64 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2856 · 199 parties · 47.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2856± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2959
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2931
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2711
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2764
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2890
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2814
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2693
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2830
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2806
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	3/6	50.0 %	+1/=4/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+3/=3/−1	2993
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3066
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2804
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2990
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2756
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2856
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2663
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+1/=5/−0	2905
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2900
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2883
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2768
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2795
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2655
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+4/=3/−0	3026
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1997
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+4/=1/−1	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	2895
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3574
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2750
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2885
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2929

Meilleur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 40 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2854 · 214 parties · 48.4 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2854± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2772
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2832
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2984
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2641
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2895
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2167
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2882
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	8	3/8	37.5 %	+0/=6/−2	2819
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2846
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2841
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2537
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	3154
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2781
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2858
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2977
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3046
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+1/=5/−0	2905
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2682
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2889
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2993
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2859
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2770
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2810
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	3080
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2797
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2944
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2654
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2863
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2661
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	3037
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2744

Meilleur : 71 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 45 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2846 · 316 parties · 45.3 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2846± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2870
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2252
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2641
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2739
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	27	10/27	37.0 %	+6/=8/−13	2887
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	6	4/6	66.7 %	+3/=2/−1	3094
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2634
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	23	8.5/23	37.0 %	+7/=3/−13	2874
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	26	11/26	42.3 %	+8/=6/−12	2872
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2745
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2770
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2679
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2732
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2925
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+0/=5/−2	2772
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2820
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2721
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2736
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+0/=5/−1	2797
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+0/=5/−1	2795
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2885
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	6	4.5/6	75.0 %	+3/=3/−0	3030
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	28	14.5/28	51.8 %	+11/=7/−10	2851
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2795
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	24	11/24	45.8 %	+5/=12/−7	2785
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2960
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	3023
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2944
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2895
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2494
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2941
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	5	3/5	60.0 %	+2/=2/−1	2796
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2985

Meilleur : 79 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 27 % vs Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2841 · 227 parties · 46.3 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2841± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	3052
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2863
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+1/=1/−7	2739
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2509
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2853
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2781
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2917
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	2760
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3106
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2107
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2846
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2820
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2910
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	2708
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+2/=5/−2	2858
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2577
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2797
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3013
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2803
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2878
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	13	7/13	53.8 %	+6/=2/−5	2865
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2859
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2872
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3148
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2801
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2988
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	5	3/5	60.0 %	+1/=4/−0	2855
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2895
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3053
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	5/8	62.5 %	+3/=4/−1	2815
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2811

Meilleur : 55 % vs Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 40 % vs Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2840 · 304 parties · 47.5 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2840± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	34	14.5/34	42.6 %	+8/=13/−13	2875
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	33	10.5/33	31.8 %	+3/=15/−15	2772
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	49	21.5/49	43.9 %	+13/=17/−19	2861
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2838
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	33	15/33	45.5 %	+11/=8/−14	2842
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2859	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+3/=7/−4	2834
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2925
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	47	25.5/47	54.3 %	+19/=13/−15	2844
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	45	22/45	48.9 %	+17/=10/−18	2789
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+7/=5/−1	2967
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2804

Meilleur : 73 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2839 · 232 parties · 45.5 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2839± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2959
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	0.5/5	10.0 %	+0/=1/−4	2670
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2952
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2975
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2788
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	9	2/9	22.2 %	+0/=4/−5	2756
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2776
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2789
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2966
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2963
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2980
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	8	4/8	50.0 %	+1/=6/−1	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	3/9	33.3 %	+0/=6/−3	2754
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2870
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2820
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	2/3	66.7 %	+1/=2/−0	2977
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2812
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2804
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+0/=3/−3	2655
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2802
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+2/=5/−4	2775
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2695
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2814
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2859
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1997
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	8	6/8	75.0 %	+6/=0/−2	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+3/=5/−1	2853
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3053
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2941
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2765
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2929

Meilleur : 41 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2838 · 559 parties · 44.2 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2838± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2680
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2915
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2852
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2787
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	45	15/45	33.3 %	+8/=14/−23	2859
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2819
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2172
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	25	6.5/25	26.0 %	+3/=7/−15	2785
Shredder 6 — 1 Thread	2937	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2842
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	25	7/25	28.0 %	+4/=6/−15	2762
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+5/=1/−9	2824
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2683
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2978
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	2870
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	15	5/15	33.3 %	+1/=8/−6	2783
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	5/13	38.5 %	+1/=8/−4	2815
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+0/=7/−2	2812
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	13	5/13	38.5 %	+3/=4/−6	2794
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+5/=5/−4	2899
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2898
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2820
Deep Fritz — 1 Thread	2859	14	8/14	57.1 %	+5/=6/−3	2909
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	13	7/13	53.8 %	+2/=10/−1	2885
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2903
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2736
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2926
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2700
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	28	13.5/28	48.2 %	+10/=7/−11	2834
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	13	6/13	46.2 %	+5/=2/−6	2814
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+4/=5/−2	2903
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2657
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+7/=5/−3	2915
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2934
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3001
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2898
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2899
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	34	21.5/34	63.2 %	+14/=15/−5	2888
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2838
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2583
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2750
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2834
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	12	6/12	50.0 %	+2/=8/−2	2674

Meilleur : 75 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2836 · 189 parties · 56.1 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2836± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2919
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+3/=3/−7	2786
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2904
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2857
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2751
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	9	6/9	66.7 %	+6/=0/−3	2934
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	19	10.5/19	55.3 %	+7/=7/−5	2834
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2755
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	24	14/24	58.3 %	+13/=2/−9	2804
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	29	21.5/29	74.1 %	+19/=5/−5	2927
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	23	14/23	60.9 %	+10/=8/−5	2816
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	20	11/20	55.0 %	+10/=2/−8	2761

Meilleur : 74 % vs Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs Fritz 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 Mac — 1 Thread

Apple Silicon M1 Max · cote Ordo 2836 · 686 parties · 42.0 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2836± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	56	18/56	32.1 %	+4/=28/−24	2849
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	56	21.5/56	38.4 %	+12/=19/−25	2885
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	56	19.5/56	34.8 %	+9/=21/−26	2817
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	55	21.5/55	39.1 %	+10/=23/−22	2814
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	53	25.5/53	48.1 %	+16/=19/−18	2861
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	410	182/410	44.4 %	+71/=222/−117	2832

Meilleur : 48 % vs The King 3.50 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 32 % vs Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2827 · 432 parties · 66.4 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2827± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2959
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2835
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+2/=5/−6	2794
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2778
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+3/=5/−3	2874
Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread	2872	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2724
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2934
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	13	4/13	30.8 %	+3/=2/−8	2717
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2759
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2887
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2822
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2878
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2809
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2972
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	3009
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+6/=5/−0	3027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2874
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	11	6/11	54.5 %	+3/=6/−2	2832
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2665
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2791
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2753
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2813
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2838
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2788
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2847
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2896
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2674
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	6	5/6	83.3 %	+4/=2/−0	2826
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2694
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2651
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2632
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2584
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	13.5/14	96.4 %	+13/=1/−0	2936
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	13.5/14	96.4 %	+13/=1/−0	2888
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2251
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3026
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Mephisto RISC II	2221	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2652
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	14	14/14	100.0 %	+14/=0/−0	2979
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 · plus dur : 30 % vs Fruit 2.1 PC — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2820 · 85 parties · 44.1 % · err ±22

Cote Ordo2820± 22

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2909
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2891
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2919
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2786
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+3/=5/−7	2744
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2744
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2762
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2864

Meilleur : 60 % vs Fritz 6 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 37 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2814 · 692 parties · 42.6 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2814± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	6	2/6	33.3 %	+0/=4/−2	2931
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2920
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2917
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	30	7.5/30	25.0 %	+2/=11/−17	2788
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2719
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	23	8/23	34.8 %	+5/=6/−12	2858
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	55	20/55	36.4 %	+13/=14/−28	2829
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	20	5.5/20	27.5 %	+2/=7/−11	2750
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	12	5/12	41.7 %	+2/=6/−4	2857
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	2462
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	40	15.5/40	38.8 %	+8/=15/−17	2825
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	48	16/48	33.3 %	+8/=16/−24	2783
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2688
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	2980
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	8	4/8	50.0 %	+2/=4/−2	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2648
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	55	22/55	40.0 %	+15/=14/−26	2803
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2781
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3665
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2897
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	4/10	40.0 %	+1/=6/−3	2786
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3015
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2897
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	24	13/24	54.2 %	+7/=12/−5	2875
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2783
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	47	21.5/47	45.7 %	+15/=13/−19	2810
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2839
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2718
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	9	3/9	33.3 %	+3/=0/−6	2716
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+0/=5/−6	2614
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2891
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2810
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2664
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	55	34.5/55	62.7 %	+27/=15/−13	2887
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	39	22/39	56.4 %	+12/=20/−7	2838
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	7/16	43.8 %	+4/=6/−6	2748
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2835
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2775
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2685
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2941
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	5/9	55.6 %	+2/=6/−1	2765
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	7	4/7	57.1 %	+3/=2/−2	2724

Meilleur : 63 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 23 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2810 · 293 parties · 66.6 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2810± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2684
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2788
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2635
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2634
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2878
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2588
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2716
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2567
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2802
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2685
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2683
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2781
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2947
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2767
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2767
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2854
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2758
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2503
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2648
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2648
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2763
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2814
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2610
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+7/=7/−2	2904
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2696
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2686
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2637
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2865
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	2984
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2821
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2941
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2937
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2847
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	2861
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	9	8.5/9	94.4 %	+8/=1/−0	2995
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3276
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3270
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2920
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2907
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3185
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3125
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2704
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2801 · 200 parties · 41.0 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2801± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2772
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	1/8	12.5 %	+1/=0/−7	2684
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	3019
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2562
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	3110
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2972
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2830
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	2126
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2682
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2754
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	8	2/8	25.0 %	+2/=0/−6	2683
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2679
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	3017
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+0/=3/−4	2630
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2574
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2687
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	6	3/6	50.0 %	+3/=0/−3	2841
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2781
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2741
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	5/11	45.5 %	+2/=6/−3	2795
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	2951
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	3001
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2944
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	3000
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2839
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2624
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	7	2/7	28.6 %	+2/=0/−5	2515

Meilleur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 36 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

List 512 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2797 · 538 parties · 41.5 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2797± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2714
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2828
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3170
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2885
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	19	5.5/19	28.9 %	+3/=5/−11	2811
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	50	14.5/50	29.0 %	+5/=19/−26	2770
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2817
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2724
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	36	14/36	38.9 %	+9/=10/−17	2826
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	48	19/48	39.6 %	+13/=12/−23	2830
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2815
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2891
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2755
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2595
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	56	19/56	33.9 %	+13/=12/−31	2758
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+0/=3/−0	2870
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2787
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3049
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2857
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3656
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2854
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2621
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2650
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	45	23/45	51.1 %	+18/=10/−17	2847
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3639
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2736
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	19	8.5/19	44.7 %	+5/=7/−7	2800
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2959
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2855
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	55	20.5/55	37.3 %	+13/=15/−27	2724
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	29	12.5/29	43.1 %	+7/=11/−11	2745
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2785
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2775
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2893
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2852
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2847
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+3/=7/−2	2755
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2865

Meilleur : 70 % vs Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 21 % vs Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 6 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2794 · 368 parties · 48.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2794± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2844
Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2919	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2728
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	28	13/28	46.4 %	+8/=10/−10	2848
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2745
Gambit Tiger 2.0 — 1 Thread	2857	29	10/29	34.5 %	+6/=8/−15	2745
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+1/=5/−7	2666
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	34	12.5/34	36.8 %	+5/=15/−14	2744
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	9	5/9	55.6 %	+4/=2/−3	2875
Gandalf 6.01 — 1 Thread	2820	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2750
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	39	17/39	43.6 %	+7/=20/−12	2769
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	29	16.5/29	56.9 %	+11/=11/−7	2845
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	34	22.5/34	66.2 %	+15/=15/−4	2862
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	53	30.5/53	57.5 %	+17/=27/−9	2797
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	33	18/33	54.5 %	+13/=10/−10	2771
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	21	14/21	66.7 %	+12/=4/−5	2846

Meilleur : 67 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 25 % vs Deep Junior 7 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU

486DX 33 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2791 · 244 parties · 67.4 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2791± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2959
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2835
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	3096
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2827
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	16	9/16	56.2 %	+6/=6/−4	2858
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+2/=7/−7	2698
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	16	11.5/16	71.9 %	+10/=3/−3	2948
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+7/=3/−6	2796
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+7/=1/−8	2734
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+9/=5/−4	2849
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	16	10/16	62.5 %	+10/=0/−6	2815
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	18	6/18	33.3 %	+5/=2/−11	2554
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3368
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3359
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3355
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	20	16.5/20	82.5 %	+14/=5/−1	2815
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2714
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2533
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2513
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2254
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 82 % vs Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 33 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2785 · 400 parties · 61.9 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2785± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2252
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2222
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+1/=3/−3	2917
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2509
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	6	1/6	16.7 %	+1/=0/−5	2694
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2781
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2656
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2767
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2957
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+3/=1/−3	2905
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2611
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2459
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2619
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3149
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+2/=3/−0	3005
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2665
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	1.5/6	25.0 %	+1/=1/−4	2665
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2695
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2687
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	5	2/5	40.0 %	+0/=4/−1	2771
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	2/8	25.0 %	+2/=0/−6	2648
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2648
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2859
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2764
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2641
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	2/4	50.0 %	+0/=4/−0	2797
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	4.5/16	28.1 %	+3/=3/−10	2628
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	5	4/5	80.0 %	+4/=0/−1	3015
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2559
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2500
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+2/=3/−1	2732
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2759
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2941
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2796
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2928
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2905
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3015
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3276
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3270
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3195
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3185
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2891
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3158
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	3135
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3125
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2563
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz · plus dur : 25 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2775 · 245 parties · 42.2 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2775± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+1/=1/−3	2905
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2768
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	2219
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	2699
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2719
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2634
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2167
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2818
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2915
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2849
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	5	1/5	20.0 %	+1/=0/−4	2664
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2852
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	9	4.5/9	50.0 %	+4/=1/−4	2875
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2754
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2590
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2815
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2735
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	6	4/6	66.7 %	+4/=0/−2	2974
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	6	2/6	33.3 %	+2/=0/−4	2726
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2721
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+1/=5/−3	2761
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2775
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	9	4/9	44.4 %	+3/=2/−4	2788
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2814
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2575
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2797
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	5	1/5	20.0 %	+1/=0/−4	2544
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2436
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3088
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2885
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	9	6/9	66.7 %	+4/=4/−1	2794
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2835
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3346
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3122
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU · plus dur : 35 % vs ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2774 · 134 parties · 44.0 % · err ±17

Cote Ordo2774± 17

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2934
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2219
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2179
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2973
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2781
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2167
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2837
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2907
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2891
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2755
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2754
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2679
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	3	1/3	33.3 %	+0/=2/−1	2738
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2856
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	2056
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2765
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	3126
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2562
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2560
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	3029
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2763
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2903
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2810
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2801
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	7.5/16	46.9 %	+6/=3/−7	2770
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2785
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	4	3.5/4	87.5 %	+3/=1/−0	3113
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	3	1/3	33.3 %	+1/=0/−2	2629
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2637
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2674
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2847
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063

Meilleur : 85 % vs Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 41 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2756 · 193 parties · 33.7 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2756± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Strelka 5.5 x64 — 1 Thread	3409	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2609
Komodo64 3 — 1 Thread	3310	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2510
Andscacs 0.72 — 1 Thread	3236	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	2436
Daydreamer 2.0.0 — 1 Thread	3185	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2714
Gull 1.2 x64 — 1 Thread	3129	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2329
DiscoCheck 5.2.1 — 1 Thread	3107	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2852
Rybka 1.0 Beta — 1 Thread	3071	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2601
Spike 1.2 Turin — 1 Thread	3049	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2711
Murka 3 x64 UCI — 1 Thread	3029	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2774
Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx — 1 Thread	3026	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2688
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2771
HIARCS 11.1 UCI — 1 Thread	3020	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2549
Toga II 3.1.2SE JA — 1 Thread	3020	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2765
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2764
Twisted Logic 20100815 — 1 Thread	3018	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2680
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2641
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2995
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2795
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	8.5/16	53.1 %	+8/=1/−7	2813
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2787
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2896
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2775
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3054

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 45 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Threadpont py

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2750 · 261 parties · 60.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2750± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2934
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2219
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2179
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2635
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2884
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2629
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2588
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2819
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2816
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2891
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2685
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2074
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	2070
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2667
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2577
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2856
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2943
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2655
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2752
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2648
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2838
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2730
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2623
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2722
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2712
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+4/=5/−9	2692
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2975
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2437
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	3	2/3	66.7 %	+2/=0/−1	2894
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2726
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2763
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3067
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2546
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3276
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2851
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3195
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2704
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3051
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2710
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2978
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2598

Meilleur : 100 % vs The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz · plus dur : 36 % vs Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2746 · 171 parties · 40.6 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2746± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 8 — 1 Thread	2904	15	3/15	20.0 %	+0/=6/−9	2663
Fritz 7 — 1 Thread	2897	13	7/13	53.8 %	+4/=6/−3	2924
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2753
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	2/9	22.2 %	+1/=2/−6	2648
Hiarcs 8 — 1 Thread	2840	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2781
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	24	10/24	41.7 %	+9/=2/−13	2778
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2650
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	34	11.5/34	33.8 %	+4/=15/−15	2677
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	15	6/15	40.0 %	+3/=6/−6	2674
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+6/=5/−4	2786
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+9/=3/−3	2873

Meilleur : 70 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 20 % vs Fritz 8 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2744 · 195 parties · 46.2 % · err ±14

Cote Ordo2744± 14

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+2/=3/−4	2795
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2564
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	29	7.5/29	25.9 %	+5/=5/−19	2654
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2689
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	53	22.5/53	42.5 %	+9/=27/−17	2741
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	15	9/15	60.0 %	+6/=6/−3	2816
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2739
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	21	11.5/21	54.8 %	+9/=5/−7	2759
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	34	24/34	70.6 %	+20/=8/−6	2826

Meilleur : 71 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread · plus dur : 15 % vs Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads.

↑ retour au classement

Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2739 · 126 parties · 42.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2739± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Junior 8 — 1 Thread	2873	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2753
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	9	2/9	22.2 %	+2/=0/−7	2648
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	23	9/23	39.1 %	+5/=8/−10	2760
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2689
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	33	15/33	45.5 %	+10/=10/−13	2762
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+4/=5/−6	2699
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2744
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+4/=7/−2	2780

Meilleur : 58 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread · plus dur : 35 % vs List 512 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2726 · 569 parties · 57.6 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2726± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2635
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2885
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	2219
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2842
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2635
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2693
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	2521
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2671
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2115
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	2716
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+1/=5/−2	2861
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	2754
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2635
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+1/=5/−3	2796
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2749
Deep Sjeng 1.6 — 8 Threads	2865	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2758
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2820
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2056
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2696
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2543
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	5	2/5	40.0 %	+1/=2/−2	2776
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	8	3/8	37.5 %	+1/=4/−3	2752
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2800
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2731
Junior 7 — 1 Thread	2836	20	9/20	45.0 %	+8/=2/−10	2802
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2657
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	9	4/9	44.4 %	+1/=6/−2	2775
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2899
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2903
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+2/=7/−3	2768
Fritz 6 — 1 Thread	2794	21	7/21	33.3 %	+5/=4/−12	2673
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	16	6/16	37.5 %	+6/=0/−10	2703
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	7	5.5/7	78.6 %	+5/=1/−1	3010
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2615
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2863
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2750
Nimzo 8 — 1 Thread	2746	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+3/=3/−9	2598
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	21	9.5/21	45.2 %	+7/=5/−9	2711
Hiarcs 7.32 — 1 Thread	2739	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+2/=7/−4	2685
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2794
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2949
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3078
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3071
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2856
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2787
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3035
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3015
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2777
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2771
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	3241
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3195
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3185
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	5	5/5	100.0 %	+5/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3158
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2847
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2836
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3122
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz · plus dur : 20 % vs Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2674 · 638 parties · 66.5 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2674± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
The King 3.50 — 8 Threads	3052	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2714
Fruit 2.2.1 — 1 Thread	3022	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	2684
Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread	3019	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2637
Shredder 10 UCI — 1 Thread	2979	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2871
Shredder 9.1 UCI — 1 Thread	2973	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2719
Shredder 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2972	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2634
Fritz 9 UCI py — 1 Thread	2967	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2167
ProDeo 2.0 — 1 Thread	2926	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2806
Deep Gandalf 7.0-64 — 2 Threads	2915	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2115
Fritz 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2907	7	1.5/7	21.4 %	+1/=1/−5	2682
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	6	2/6	33.3 %	+1/=2/−3	2784
Chess Tiger 2007 — 1 Thread	2891	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	2530
Gandalf 6.0 — 1 Thread	2875	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2621
The King 3.50 — 1 Thread	2874	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2633
Hiarcs 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2870	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2590
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	8	2/8	25.0 %	+0/=4/−4	2667
Shredder 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2665
Fritz 6 UCI py — 1 Thread	2856	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2601
THE KING 3.23 — 1 Thread	2854	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2783
Junior 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2846	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	2535
THE KING 3.33 — 1 Thread	2841	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	2704
Gandalf 5.1 — 1 Thread	2839	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	2584
Ruffian 2.1.0 — 1 Thread	2838	12	6/12	50.0 %	+2/=8/−2	2838
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2827
SOS 5 for Arena — 1 Thread	2814	7	3/7	42.9 %	+2/=2/−3	2764
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2619
Junior 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2801	7	5/7	71.4 %	+5/=0/−2	2960
List 512 — 1 Thread	2797	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2606
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	18	12/18	66.7 %	+11/=2/−5	2912
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+1/=3/−2	2726
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	9	3/9	33.3 %	+1/=4/−4	2654
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	4	2/4	50.0 %	+1/=2/−1	2774
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2661
Fritz 5.32 — 1 Thread	2744	34	10/34	29.4 %	+6/=8/−20	2592
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	2606
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3079
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	3078
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2941
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2937
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2847
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2613
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2905
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2885
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2667
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2981
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3241
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2822
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3195
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3185
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2766
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3167
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3158
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3135
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2717
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2836
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3122
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3025
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2710
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2978
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2960
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2887

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz · plus dur : 10 % vs Fruit 2.3.1 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2568 · 244 parties · 66.0 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2568± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2827
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	2394
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2594
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2344
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2162
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2757
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2746
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+5/=1/−9	2451
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3303
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2822
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	15	11/15	73.3 %	+10/=2/−3	2560
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+7/=5/−0	2595
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	15	11/15	73.3 %	+10/=2/−3	2518
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+9/=3/−0	2673
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2131
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	2524
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+9/=1/−2	2486
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2795
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2727
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 96 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2566 · 244 parties · 65.0 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2566± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2556
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2162
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2377
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+8/=1/−9	2527
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2694
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2279
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2651
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2741
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	18	13/18	72.2 %	+11/=4/−3	2550
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2571
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2875
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2680
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2827
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2670
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2795
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	10/12	83.3 %	+9/=2/−1	2462
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2559 · 244 parties · 63.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2559± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2714
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2429
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2403
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2377
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	17	8/17	47.1 %	+7/=2/−8	2526
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2952
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	17	12/17	70.6 %	+10/=4/−3	2536
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2571
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2745
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2758
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+9/=3/−0	2673
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2697
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2798
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2667
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2555 · 247 parties · 61.5 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2555± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2827
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2429
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2544
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2495
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2238
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2425
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2377
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2757
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2559
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2666
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3323
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2684
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2279
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2632
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3240
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2442
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2571
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2745
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2462
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2752
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2616
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+9/=3/−0	2592
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2667
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2727
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2268
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz

68040 40 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2546 · 643 parties · 68.4 % · err ±7

Cote Ordo2546± 7

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	6	1/6	16.7 %	+0/=2/−4	2547
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2509
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	20	3.5/20	17.5 %	+1/=5/−14	2522
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2403
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1975
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2473
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2515
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2750
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2485
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2373
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+9/=1/−5	2663
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+9/=1/−8	2586
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	17	9/17	52.9 %	+8/=2/−7	2580
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2435
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	14	10/14	71.4 %	+9/=2/−3	2682
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2562
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3293
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2608
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2551
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2562
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+9/=1/−2	2640
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2492
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2584
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2686
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	48	42.5/48	88.5 %	+37/=11/−0	2739
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	14	9/14	64.3 %	+8/=2/−4	2482
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2718
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	13	9/13	69.2 %	+8/=2/−3	2511
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2705
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	44	32.5/44	73.9 %	+29/=7/−8	2543
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+7/=5/−1	2532
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	6	5/6	83.3 %	+5/=0/−1	2621
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2717
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2526
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3125
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2554
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	43	37/43	86.0 %	+34/=6/−3	2631
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2682
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	9/12	75.0 %	+8/=2/−2	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Mephisto RISC II	2221	43	40.5/43	94.2 %	+39/=3/−1	2704
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	11	10/11	90.9 %	+10/=0/−1	2619
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	2490
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2195
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz · plus dur : 10 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2543 · 105 parties · 80.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2543± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2604
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+8/=5/−1	2554
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+8/=3/−3	2445
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	13	9/13	69.2 %	+7/=4/−2	2367
Mephisto RISC II	2221	13	13/13	100.0 %	+13/=0/−0	3021
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2610
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	13	12/13	92.3 %	+12/=0/−1	2606
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2925
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2396
Novag Sapphire	2096	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2896
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	3	2.5/3	83.3 %	+2/=1/−0	2372
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2829

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto RISC II · plus dur : 40 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2523 · 244 parties · 62.3 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2523± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	0.5/4	12.5 %	+0/=1/−3	2472
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2601
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2403
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	14	4/14	28.6 %	+3/=2/−9	2387
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2503
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3240
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2599
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2584
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+9/=3/−2	2575
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+7/=5/−0	2595
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2538
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	2653
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+9/=5/−1	2542
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2131
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	9/13	69.2 %	+8/=2/−3	2456
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	11.5/12	95.8 %	+11/=1/−0	2798
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	14	12/14	85.7 %	+12/=0/−2	2562
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2057
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2503 · 229 parties · 58.3 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2503± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	9	0.5/9	5.6 %	+0/=1/−8	2318
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2273
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2746
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2488
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2279
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2651
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2548
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+8/=1/−3	2538
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2510
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2538
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+9/=1/−2	2574
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2364
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2513
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2616
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2457
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	10/12	83.3 %	+9/=2/−1	2533
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2721
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHzturbo

ChessMachine SR, ARM 140 MHz — cmcard, accélérée · cote Ordo 2493 · 94 parties · 61.2 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2493± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2791
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3366
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2503
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3270
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2441
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2538
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2178
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHzturbo

ChessMachine SR, ARM 140 MHz — cmcard, accélérée · cote Ordo 2476 · 155 parties · 51.3 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2476± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	2010
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2425
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2483
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2414
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2537
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2448
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2664
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2583
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2576
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2697
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2555
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2463
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2353

Meilleur : 90 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020 · plus dur : 0 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2470 · 250 parties · 53.8 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2470± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	2010
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2368
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2425
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2162
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2757
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2559
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2746
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2464
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2694
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3240
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+7/=1/−5	2438
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2231
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+7/=1/−5	2396
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2544
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2697
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2072
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2335
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	9/12	75.0 %	+8/=2/−2	2441
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHzturbo

ChessMachine SR, ARM 150 MHz — cmcard, accélérée · cote Ordo 2460 · 94 parties · 58.0 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2460± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2791
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2684
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3184
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2538
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2342
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2105
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2373
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2441 · 243 parties · 58.6 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2441± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2566
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2750
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2426
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2660
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+8/=3/−4	2535
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3193
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	17	6.5/17	38.2 %	+6/=1/−10	2301
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2571
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	12/14	85.7 %	+10/=4/−0	2674
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	16	5/16	31.2 %	+5/=0/−11	2205
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2567
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	15	10.5/15	70.0 %	+7/=7/−1	2462
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2457
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	16	11.5/16	71.9 %	+9/=5/−2	2417
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	17	13.5/17	79.4 %	+12/=3/−2	2485
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	17	12/17	70.6 %	+11/=2/−4	2335
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2178
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 86 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHzturbo

ARM2 400 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2440 · 380 parties · 50.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2440± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2186
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2265
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2048
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1755
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2396
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2378
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1670
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+4/=3/−8	2346
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	11	2/11	18.2 %	+1/=2/−8	2147
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2459
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+7/=1/−4	2474
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2316
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+8/=1/−6	2426
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2503
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	15	7/15	46.7 %	+6/=2/−7	2344
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	27	14/27	51.9 %	+10/=8/−9	2376
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+5/=7/−0	2512
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	6/13	46.2 %	+5/=2/−6	2309
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+4/=1/−7	2236
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2624
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	26	18.5/26	71.2 %	+15/=7/−4	2472
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2436
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2371
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2332
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2601
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	27	22.5/27	83.3 %	+19/=7/−1	2458
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2960

Meilleur : 100 % vs Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2408 · 245 parties · 49.4 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2408± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2827
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2299
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2566
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2559
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+2/=1/−9	2314
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2694
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3241
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	9/11	81.8 %	+8/=2/−1	2701
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+7/=1/−5	2438
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2460
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2358
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	13	9/13	69.2 %	+9/=0/−4	2483
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	14	8.5/14	60.7 %	+7/=3/−4	2411
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1522
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+4/=5/−3	2344
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2463
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+6/=7/−0	2424
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	14	9/14	64.3 %	+8/=2/−4	2285
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2057
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2041

Meilleur : 82 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2395 · 153 parties · 45.4 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2395± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2299
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1950
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2449
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2376
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2597
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2495
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2371
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2399
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2528
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	2283
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2421
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2395

Meilleur : 77 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2393 · 94 parties · 51.1 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2393± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2355
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2167
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3135
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2182
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHzturbo

ChessMachine SR, ARM 150 MHz — cmcard, accélérée · cote Ordo 2385 · 150 parties · 44.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2385± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	2010
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2245
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+4/=1/−7	2351
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2355
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2745
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2283
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2455
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	9/11	81.8 %	+7/=4/−0	2576
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+8/=1/−3	2408
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+5/=3/−1	2417
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2484

Meilleur : 90 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz

68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2384 · 618 parties · 49.4 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2384± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2245
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	15	4/15	26.7 %	+3/=2/−10	2392
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	18	5/18	27.8 %	+3/=4/−11	2400
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	17	5/17	29.4 %	+3/=4/−10	2407
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2497
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	48	5.5/48	11.5 %	+0/=11/−37	2191
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+2/=3/−9	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+3/=1/−8	2349
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2412
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+5/=1/−7	2416
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	17	10.5/17	61.8 %	+10/=1/−6	2525
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+5/=1/−7	2354
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2182
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2414
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	13	8/13	61.5 %	+6/=4/−3	2462
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	17	12/17	70.6 %	+12/=0/−5	2532
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	14	8/14	57.1 %	+6/=4/−4	2420
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	16	11/16	68.8 %	+9/=4/−3	2504
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	43	25/43	58.1 %	+23/=4/−16	2420
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	14	8/14	57.1 %	+6/=4/−4	2408
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	6	3.5/6	58.3 %	+3/=1/−2	2400
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2394
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2335
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2193
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+4/=5/−3	2351
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	43	28/43	65.1 %	+26/=4/−13	2423
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+9/=1/−3	2439
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+8/=1/−3	2417
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	4	4/4	100.0 %	+4/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1426
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	12	12/12	100.0 %	+12/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Mephisto RISC II	2221	43	29.5/43	68.6 %	+28/=3/−12	2356
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	18	11/18	61.1 %	+9/=4/−5	2298
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	14	11/14	78.6 %	+10/=2/−2	2405
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2268
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2087
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	5	3/5	60.0 %	+3/=0/−2	2148
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2057
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU · plus dur : 5 % vs WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2380 · 244 parties · 46.9 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2380± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2714
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	2010
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2273
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2368
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	14	5/14	35.7 %	+4/=2/−8	2444
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2504
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2584
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	13	5/13	38.5 %	+3/=4/−6	2302
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2561
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2495
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2358
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2342
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2360
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	8/12	66.7 %	+5/=6/−1	2435
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	14	7.5/14	53.6 %	+6/=3/−5	2279
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2460
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	13	10/13	76.9 %	+7/=6/−0	2392
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2237
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 77 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2380 · 244 parties · 50.0 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2380± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2368
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	2208
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2503
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+6/=1/−8	2393
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	17	5/17	29.4 %	+5/=0/−12	2232
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3170
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	11/14	78.6 %	+10/=2/−2	2589
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	16	11/16	68.8 %	+10/=2/−4	2479
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	17	9/17	52.9 %	+6/=6/−5	2355
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	2541
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	17	12/17	70.6 %	+9/=6/−2	2406
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	9.5/12	79.2 %	+8/=3/−1	2483
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2521
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1887
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 88 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2370 · 244 parties · 45.7 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2370± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2010
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2601
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	13	4/13	30.8 %	+3/=2/−8	2405
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2503
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2684
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2308
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	14	6/14	42.9 %	+4/=4/−6	2334
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2363
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2358
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	13	10/13	76.9 %	+8/=4/−1	2551
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2513
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2435
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2457
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2356
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	10/12	83.3 %	+10/=0/−2	2530
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	13	10.5/13	80.8 %	+10/=1/−2	2432
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2087
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2268
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2237
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2057
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 83 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2367 · 244 parties · 49.4 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2367± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	5	0/5	0.0 %	+0/=0/−5	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2368
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	2208
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2684
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2660
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	15	8/15	53.3 %	+7/=2/−6	2463
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2202
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	16	5/16	31.2 %	+3/=4/−9	2247
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+7/=5/−2	2493
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	17	9.5/17	55.9 %	+7/=5/−5	2383
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	17	9/17	52.9 %	+6/=6/−5	2355
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2513
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	9/14	64.3 %	+5/=8/−1	2417
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2487
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	16	9.5/16	59.4 %	+7/=5/−4	2320
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2589
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	16	12/16	75.0 %	+10/=4/−2	2373
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 88 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Genius 68030 London

68EC030 33,3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2363 · 912 parties · 60.5 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo2363± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	14	0.5/14	3.6 %	+0/=1/−13	2254
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+0/=5/−7	2336
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2055
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2177
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2173
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	44	11.5/44	26.1 %	+8/=7/−29	2366
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+1/=5/−8	2352
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+0/=5/−7	2291
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2356
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2174
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2602
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	14	2/14	14.3 %	+0/=4/−10	2130
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	27	13/27	48.1 %	+9/=8/−10	2427
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2311
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2263
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2003
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	43	18/43	41.9 %	+16/=4/−23	2327
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2248
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	14	3/14	21.4 %	+2/=2/−10	2154
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+2/=5/−7	2237
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2358
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	4	3/4	75.0 %	+3/=0/−1	2533
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+5/=1/−7	2282
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2165
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+4/=5/−2	2389
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2287
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	8.5/14	60.7 %	+6/=5/−3	2391
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2133
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2333
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+6/=5/−7	2234
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2309
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+6/=5/−1	2380
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2526
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2221	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2430
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	16	6/16	37.5 %	+3/=6/−7	2130
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2167
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2353
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	15	11/15	73.3 %	+9/=4/−2	2355
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2390
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2686
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2542
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2257
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2329
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2244
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2566
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2394
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+5/=5/−1	2219
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2886
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	14	12/14	85.7 %	+11/=2/−1	2389
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2564
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2330
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2347
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2266
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2181
Saitek President	1875	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2675
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2171
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2654
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2343
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2622
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2588
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2284
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2546
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2236
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Prisma · plus dur : 4 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2358 · 244 parties · 44.7 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2358± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	2010
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2377
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2368
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+1/=5/−7	2373
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2302
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3241
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+0/=7/−5	2286
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2584
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	14	6/14	42.9 %	+4/=4/−6	2334
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	6/12	50.0 %	+3/=6/−3	2363
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2342
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	14	8.5/14	60.7 %	+6/=5/−3	2411
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	7/12	58.3 %	+5/=4/−3	2373
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2105
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+9/=1/−3	2427
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	13	8.5/13	65.4 %	+7/=3/−3	2361
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	13	10/13	76.9 %	+9/=2/−2	2392
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 77 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2347 · 94 parties · 46.3 % · err ±21

Cote Ordo2347± 21

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2568
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2302
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2558
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3158
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2144
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3063
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2254
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1451
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2373
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2342 · 452 parties · 46.6 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2342± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2601
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	15	4/15	26.7 %	+3/=2/−10	2392
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	2228
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2143
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2435
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	6	1/6	16.7 %	+1/=0/−5	2266
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2212
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+2/=1/−9	2271
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2235
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+5/=1/−7	2416
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	16	11/16	68.8 %	+11/=0/−5	2578
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	13	4/13	30.8 %	+4/=0/−9	2267
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2366
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2443
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	6	2.5/6	41.7 %	+2/=1/−3	2326
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	16	5/16	31.2 %	+4/=2/−10	2243
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	13	3/13	23.1 %	+1/=4/−8	2161
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	17	7.5/17	44.1 %	+5/=5/−7	2326
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	4	1/4	25.0 %	+1/=0/−3	2172
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	14	7/14	50.0 %	+4/=6/−4	2358
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2254
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2526
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2422
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+3/=1/−8	2168
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2315
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	14	8/14	57.1 %	+6/=4/−4	2316
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2383
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	5	3.5/5	70.0 %	+3/=1/−1	2401
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1451
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2226
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	22	14/22	63.6 %	+12/=4/−6	2322
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	10.5/16	65.6 %	+9/=3/−4	2334
Mephisto RISC II	2221	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+1/=3/−0	2309
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	12	10/12	83.3 %	+9/=2/−1	2499
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	4	3/4	75.0 %	+2/=2/−0	2370
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2351
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2534
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	3	3/3	100.0 %	+3/=0/−0	2719
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 90 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz · plus dur : 8 % vs Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2335 · 150 parties · 42.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2335± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2164
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	13	7/13	53.8 %	+6/=2/−5	2467
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2326
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+7/=1/−5	2417
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	13	8/13	61.5 %	+7/=2/−4	2424
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	13	7/13	53.8 %	+6/=2/−5	2362
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+6/=3/−4	2369
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	8/13	61.5 %	+6/=4/−3	2335
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	9	3/9	33.3 %	+3/=0/−6	2130
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+7/=3/−2	2337

Meilleur : 71 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2335 · 543 parties · 50.0 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2335± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2292
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+0/=3/−9	2230
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+0/=3/−9	2221
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2139
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2355
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+1/=5/−9	2316
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2474
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2235
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2260
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2209
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	14	5.5/14	39.3 %	+4/=3/−7	2332
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2331
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2264
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2355
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	17	8/17	47.1 %	+5/=6/−6	2359
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	14	7/14	50.0 %	+5/=4/−5	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	17	8/17	47.1 %	+5/=6/−6	2347
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2533
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	14	5.5/14	39.3 %	+3/=5/−6	2283
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2538
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2151
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	6/13	46.2 %	+5/=2/−6	2309
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2296
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2485
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	13	7.5/13	57.7 %	+7/=1/−5	2320
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+7/=3/−2	2417
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2445
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3051
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	22	16/22	72.7 %	+14/=4/−4	2395
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3021
Mephisto RISC II	2221	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2250
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	17	12.5/17	73.5 %	+12/=1/−4	2397
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2560
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2345
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2542
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2153
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2245
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2287
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2151
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2411
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2766
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2476
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 0 % vs Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM6 32 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2325 · 151 parties · 38.4 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo2325± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	2010
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2214
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2162
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1746
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+7/=1/−4	2529
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2516
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+2/=5/−4	2299
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2245
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2364
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2404
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2225
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2348
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2280

Meilleur : 68 % vs Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz.

↑ retour au classement

MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2322 · 249 parties · 36.9 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2322± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	2429
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2601
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	2544
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1975
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2368
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2759
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2559
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2314
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2714
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2139
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3208
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+3/=5/−4	2355
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2398
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2358
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+8/=1/−3	2496
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2335
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2315
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2457
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	7/12	58.3 %	+7/=0/−5	2312
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2314
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1419
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2212
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1866
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 71 % vs Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020

68EC020 24,6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2315 · 947 parties · 56.9 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo2315± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	14	0.5/14	3.6 %	+0/=1/−13	2254
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	2359
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2055
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2177
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2254
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	43	6/43	14.0 %	+3/=6/−34	2230
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+3/=3/−8	2413
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	13	4/13	30.8 %	+3/=2/−8	2382
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2202
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2094
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2088
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	15	4.5/15	30.0 %	+1/=7/−7	2294
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	26	7.5/26	28.8 %	+4/=7/−15	2283
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+3/=5/−4	2379
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2182
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	11	2/11	18.2 %	+0/=4/−7	2124
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	43	15/43	34.9 %	+13/=4/−26	2276
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	12	4/12	33.3 %	+1/=6/−5	2259
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2154
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2250
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	14	5/14	35.7 %	+1/=8/−5	2265
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	5.5/14	39.3 %	+3/=5/−6	2287
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	12	5/12	41.7 %	+3/=4/−5	2300
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	4	2/4	50.0 %	+2/=0/−2	2342
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+4/=3/−6	2282
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2165
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2236
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2322
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2398
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	2298
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+8/=3/−7	2273
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2153
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	12	8/12	66.7 %	+6/=4/−2	2346
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	20	10.5/20	52.5 %	+9/=3/−8	2242
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2064
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	14	11/14	78.6 %	+9/=4/−1	2447
Mephisto RISC II	2221	13	7/13	53.8 %	+5/=4/−4	2247
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	16	10/16	62.5 %	+10/=0/−6	2308
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2230
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2241
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+8/=3/−2	2352
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2348
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2495
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2461
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2223
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2366
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2187
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2287
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	2351
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2333
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+6/=5/−0	2299
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2388
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	12	11/12	91.7 %	+10/=2/−0	2494
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2185
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2411
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2766
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2155
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2756
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2431
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2391
Saitek President	1875	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2256
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2382
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2654
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2343
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2333
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2299
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2573
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2546
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 4 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2296 · 94 parties · 41.0 % · err ±20

Cote Ordo2296± 20

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2279
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2651
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2202
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2193
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3180
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2549
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2342
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3054
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2251
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2221
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1277
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2266 · 244 parties · 39.1 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2266± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2566
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2129
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2312
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2270
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+3/=1/−9	2211
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3167
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2495
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	14	6/14	42.9 %	+4/=4/−6	2292
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	13	5.5/13	42.3 %	+5/=1/−7	2281
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2131
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2183
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	9.5/13	73.1 %	+9/=1/−3	2427
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2148
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Mephisto RISC II	2221	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2162
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	13	9/13	69.2 %	+8/=2/−3	2340
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	13	10.5/13	80.8 %	+10/=1/−2	2432
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2978
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2087
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2041

Meilleur : 81 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2263 · 266 parties · 29.9 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2263± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Hiarcs 7 UCI py — 1 Thread	2810	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	2010
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Fritz 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2785	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1985
Zarkov 6.50 w32 — 1 Thread	2775	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1975
Shredder 5.32 UCI py — 1 Thread	2774	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1974
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2245
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Yace Paderborn — 1 Thread	2726	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1926
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2559
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	12	3/12	25.0 %	+2/=2/−8	2355
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2302
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2660
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3260
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2332
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2202
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+3/=1/−8	2230
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2293
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2221
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+2/=3/−7	2181
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2131
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	2280
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2312
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2251
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2028
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2008
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	8.5/12	70.8 %	+7/=3/−2	2337
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2237
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 71 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz

68040 40 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2254 · 584 parties · 40.5 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2254± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2791
WildCat 8 UCI — 1 Thread	2756	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1956
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+2/=1/−9	2336
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2150
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	2014
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+0/=3/−9	2217
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	1978
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	2/12	16.7 %	+1/=2/−9	2224
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2174
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	13	5/13	38.5 %	+4/=2/−7	2388
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	16	4.5/16	28.1 %	+2/=5/−9	2278
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2199
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2366
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+3/=1/−8	2231
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	4	0/4	0.0 %	+0/=0/−4	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	14	6.5/14	46.4 %	+5/=3/−6	2355
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	17	5/17	29.4 %	+2/=6/−9	2227
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	14	5/14	35.7 %	+3/=4/−7	2268
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	16	6.5/16	40.6 %	+4/=5/−7	2301
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	18	9.5/18	52.8 %	+7/=5/−6	2382
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+3/=1/−9	2185
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2347
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	5	1.5/5	30.0 %	+1/=1/−3	2195
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	13	5/13	38.5 %	+3/=4/−6	2254
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2144
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2354
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	5/12	41.7 %	+5/=0/−7	2264
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	18	8.5/18	47.2 %	+7/=3/−8	2296
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+3/=1/−9	2092
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2205
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2251
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2226
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	12	1/12	8.3 %	+1/=0/−11	1808
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2221
Mephisto RISC II	2221	13	11/13	84.6 %	+11/=0/−2	2517
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	18	10.5/18	58.3 %	+8/=5/−5	2278
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+11/=1/−6	2278
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	15	8.5/15	56.7 %	+7/=3/−5	2221
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2195
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2953
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	15	11/15	73.3 %	+10/=2/−3	2301
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	15	9.5/15	63.3 %	+8/=3/−4	2212
Novag Sapphire	2096	15	11.5/15	76.7 %	+11/=1/−3	2303
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	15	10/15	66.7 %	+9/=2/−4	2213
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	4	2.5/4	62.5 %	+2/=1/−1	2166
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2301
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2251 · 528 parties · 41.1 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2251± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2827
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	2023
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	2022
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2143
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	2139
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	14	2/14	14.3 %	+2/=0/−12	2212
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	2033
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2263
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	12	3/12	25.0 %	+2/=2/−8	2279
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	17	3.5/17	20.6 %	+2/=3/−12	2207
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+0/=7/−6	2235
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2225
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+1/=3/−5	2219
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2171
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	12	2.5/12	20.8 %	+1/=3/−8	2148
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	12	2/12	16.7 %	+2/=0/−10	2091
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	2029
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2305
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	13	4.5/13	34.6 %	+3/=3/−7	2248
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3147
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3142
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	9	6/9	66.7 %	+6/=0/−3	2456
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2228
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2258
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2412
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	14	9/14	64.3 %	+7/=4/−3	2368
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2254
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	22	13/22	59.1 %	+11/=4/−7	2288
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2221
Mephisto RISC II	2221	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2391
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	18	9/18	50.0 %	+8/=2/−8	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2008
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1992
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2349
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1987
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	2272
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2307
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2344
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2295
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2418
Novag Sapphire	2096	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+7/=1/−4	2185
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2394
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2087
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1855
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2411
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2178
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2476
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 95 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)

H8S/2312 25 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2226 · 379 parties · 76.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2226± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	2027
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	13	4/13	30.8 %	+2/=4/−7	2402
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	1	1/1	100.0 %	+1/=0/−0	3184
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+1/=5/−6	2209
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2342
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	4/12	33.3 %	+2/=4/−6	2195
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+1/=5/−1	2254
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	3/7	42.9 %	+1/=4/−2	2174
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2030
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2144
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2143
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2316
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2187
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2204
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2434
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2283
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2086
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1277
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2064
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2206
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2764
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2261
Saitek President	1875	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2675
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2252
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2654
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2133
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2622
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2185
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2169
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2573
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2106
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	1761

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 25 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2225 · 244 parties · 35.7 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2225± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	2332
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2202
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2167
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	22	8/22	36.4 %	+6/=4/−12	2245
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	22	6/22	27.3 %	+4/=4/−14	2165
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2131
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	20	9.5/20	47.5 %	+8/=3/−9	2298
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2105
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	12	11/12	91.7 %	+11/=0/−1	2670
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	22	9/22	40.9 %	+7/=4/−11	2187
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	22	14/22	63.6 %	+12/=4/−6	2280
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1987
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 92 % vs Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2224 · 238 parties · 79.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo2224± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2204
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2474
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	7	4/7	57.1 %	+2/=4/−1	2276
Mephisto RISC II	2221	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	2020
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	7	3/7	42.9 %	+3/=0/−4	2125
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2571
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2562
Novag Sapphire	2096	6	5.5/6	91.7 %	+5/=1/−0	2513
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2092
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	7	5/7	71.4 %	+3/=4/−0	2188
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2436
Novag Zircon II	1964	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2276
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	7	2/7	28.6 %	+1/=2/−4	1797
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2231
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2680
Saitek President	1875	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2186
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2316
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2167
Novag Turquoise	1854	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2654
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2142
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2622
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	7	5/7	71.4 %	+5/=0/−2	1973
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2114
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	7	6/7	85.7 %	+6/=0/−1	2099
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2573
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2546
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2032

↑ retour au classement

Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2221 · 244 parties · 46.9 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2221± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2667
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2367
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	16	5.5/16	34.4 %	+4/=3/−9	2230
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	14	3/14	21.4 %	+1/=4/−9	2089
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3066
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2263
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2254
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2251
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3025
Mephisto RISC II	2221	14	9.5/14	67.9 %	+9/=1/−4	2350
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2028
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	16	6.5/16	40.6 %	+5/=3/−8	2133
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	16	9/16	56.2 %	+8/=2/−6	2226
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2178
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	16	9/16	56.2 %	+6/=6/−4	2218
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2936
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	16	9/16	56.2 %	+7/=4/−5	2169
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	16	13/16	81.2 %	+10/=6/−0	2372
Novag Sapphire	2096	16	14/16	87.5 %	+13/=2/−1	2435
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	16	10/16	62.5 %	+8/=4/−4	2181
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1887
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1855
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2195
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 88 % vs Novag Sapphire · plus dur : 21 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto RISC II

65SC02 2,5 MHz + ARM2 ChessMachine — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2221 · 661 parties · 61.3 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2221± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2395
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	43	2.5/43	5.8 %	+1/=3/−39	2062
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	13	0/13	0.0 %	+0/=0/−13	1743
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1640
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	43	13.5/43	31.4 %	+12/=3/−28	2248
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2154
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+0/=3/−1	2253
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2306
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	6/13	46.2 %	+4/=4/−5	2288
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2324
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	13	2/13	15.4 %	+2/=0/−11	1958
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2080
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2417
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	3024
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	14	4.5/14	32.1 %	+4/=1/−9	2091
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2263
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2353
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	14	10.5/14	75.0 %	+10/=1/−3	2370
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2242
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2140
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2268
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2082
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2426
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2418
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2131
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2434
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2022
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	8/11	72.7 %	+6/=4/−1	2257
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2194
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	25	18/25	72.0 %	+17/=2/−6	2241
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+6/=1/−5	2082
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2029
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2267
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2112
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2257
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	9	8.5/9	94.4 %	+8/=1/−0	2412
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1990
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	2680
Saitek President	1875	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2176
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+7/=1/−1	2150
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2238
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2654
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2133
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2333
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2299
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2284
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2106
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Prisma · plus dur : 0 % vs CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2219 · 244 parties · 33.8 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2219± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	11	1/11	9.1 %	+1/=0/−10	2146
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2250
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	2058
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	18	7/18	38.9 %	+5/=4/−9	2305
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2380
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2380
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	16	10/16	62.5 %	+7/=6/−3	2452
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2167
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	12	2/12	16.7 %	+1/=2/−9	2062
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	17	4.5/17	26.5 %	+4/=1/−12	2158
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	16	6/16	37.5 %	+6/=0/−10	2226
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2105
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	18	7.5/18	41.7 %	+5/=5/−8	2195
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	18	9/18	50.0 %	+8/=2/−8	2251
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2034
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2999
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	18	11.5/18	63.9 %	+10/=3/−5	2282
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1336
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1887
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2237
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1866
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 64 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2199 · 309 parties · 46.4 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2199± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2238
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2162
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2376
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2368
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2503
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2395
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2167
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2322
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2283
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	13	4/13	30.8 %	+3/=2/−8	2125
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2454
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2254
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2441
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1425
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	9.5/16	59.4 %	+8/=3/−5	2287
Mephisto RISC II	2221	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2157
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1419
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2182
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2210
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2369
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	6/11	54.5 %	+4/=4/−3	2206
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2013
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2344
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2287
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1995
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1887
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	12	10.5/12	87.5 %	+10/=1/−1	2384
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2126
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2347
Novag Zircon II	1964	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	2135
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2066
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 90 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 5 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2182 · 574 parties · 35.3 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2182± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	2023
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	12	2/12	16.7 %	+1/=2/−9	2287
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	12	0.5/12	4.2 %	+0/=1/−11	2010
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140 MHz	2476	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2305
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	12	0/12	0.0 %	+0/=0/−12	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	17	5/17	29.4 %	+4/=2/−11	2289
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	14	5/14	35.7 %	+4/=2/−8	2306
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2395	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	2182
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150 MHz	2385	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2084
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	13	3/13	23.1 %	+0/=6/−7	2171
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	2041
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	13	2.5/13	19.2 %	+2/=1/−10	2121
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	16	4/16	25.0 %	+2/=4/−10	2176
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2193
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	13	3/13	23.1 %	+2/=2/−9	2149
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2335	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+2/=3/−7	2181
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32 MHz	2325	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2228
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2293
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2257
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	13	2.5/13	19.2 %	+2/=1/−10	2016
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	12	3.5/12	29.2 %	+2/=3/−7	2109
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2441
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	22	8/22	36.4 %	+6/=4/−12	2127
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	7/16	43.8 %	+6/=2/−8	2178
Mephisto RISC II	2221	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2050
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+5/=3/−10	2120
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2560
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2111
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2231
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2118
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2245
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	8/11	72.7 %	+8/=0/−3	2287
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2398
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2892
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1887
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	12	10/12	83.3 %	+8/=4/−0	2326
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2829
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2195
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2477
Novag Zircon II	1964	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2023
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2301
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach III · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04

ARM2 14,2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2179 · 571 parties · 60.7 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2179± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	14	0/14	0.0 %	+0/=0/−14	2027
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2235
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2111
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	27	4.5/27	16.7 %	+1/=7/−19	2160
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	14	3/14	21.4 %	+2/=2/−10	2158
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	15	4/15	26.7 %	+2/=4/−9	2187
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	4	1/4	25.0 %	+0/=2/−2	2151
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1953
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	13	3.5/13	26.9 %	+2/=3/−8	2142
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	18	6.5/18	36.1 %	+6/=1/−11	2155
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2080
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	2261
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2221	14	3.5/14	25.0 %	+3/=1/−10	2030
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2167
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1801
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	2146
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2365
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2189
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2181
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2337
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2140
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2413
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2023
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2184
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	12	9/12	75.0 %	+8/=2/−2	2268
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	1920
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2220
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2152
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2347
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	2326
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1987
Saitek President	1875	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2066
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2382
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2157
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2156
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2343
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2123
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2614
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2588
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2155
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2546
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2178 · 244 parties · 41.2 % · err ±13

Cote Ordo2178± 13

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1950
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2270
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2441
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2150
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2156
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2145
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2072
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2063
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2441
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2415
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2221
Mephisto RISC II	2221	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2157
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2028
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2008
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2982
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	2210
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	2077
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2136
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2249
Novag Sapphire	2096	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2229
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2333
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2887
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2846
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2093
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2178
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2266
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 85 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Sparc (rev.518)

SPARClite (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2174 · 538 parties · 66.7 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2174± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	13	1/13	7.7 %	+1/=0/−12	2111
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2165
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1994
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	15	6.5/15	43.3 %	+5/=3/−7	2207
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	2153
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2258
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	4/7	57.1 %	+4/=0/−3	2273
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	7/16	43.8 %	+4/=6/−6	2178
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2255
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	5/11	45.5 %	+3/=4/−4	2167
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	2246
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1988
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	2275
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	2013
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2223
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2195
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1926
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2337
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2096
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2163
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2184
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	2233
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2379
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	2265
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2558
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2270
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2386
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2073
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2130
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2301
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2181
Saitek President	1875	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2066
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1978
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1925
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2072
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2203
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2029
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2074
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1965
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU

286 1800 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2160 · 173 parties · 40.5 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2160± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1874
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz	2440	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1640
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2276
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1981
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2151
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1953
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2219
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2103
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2113
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2346
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2112
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2322
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2125
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2117
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2131
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2394
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2220

Meilleur : 85 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach IV · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04 400 MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2153 · 183 parties · 54.1 % · err ±15

Cote Ordo2153± 15

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1960
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	3	1.5/3	50.0 %	+1/=1/−1	2335
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2245
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2060
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2291
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2008
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2217
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2104
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2195
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2046
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2062
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2163
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2176
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2267
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2266
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2301
Saitek President	1875	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2386

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek President · plus dur : 0 % vs Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz

ChessMachine SR, ARM2 14 MHz — cmcard · cote Ordo 2136 · 94 parties · 25.5 % · err ±18

Cote Ordo2136± 18

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2555
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2493
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2408
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2202
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2296
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2063
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2060
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3019
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2008
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2182
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2178
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2268
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1855
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2804
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9

68030 32 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2125 · 544 parties · 63.6 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2125± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1743
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2231
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2215
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2074
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	15	4/15	26.7 %	+3/=2/−10	2078
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2080
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	7/16	43.8 %	+5/=4/−7	2178
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1919
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	2062
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2115
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+5/=1/−5	2178
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2104
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2160
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2082
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+4/=5/−2	2181
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	4/9	44.4 %	+2/=4/−3	2058
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	4.5/7	64.3 %	+4/=1/−2	2198
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2200
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2118
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2233
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	21	12.5/21	59.5 %	+9/=7/−5	2144
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	7.5/12	62.5 %	+6/=3/−3	2141
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+3/=7/−0	2154
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2176
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2804
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2156
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2035
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2026
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1990
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2120
Saitek President	1875	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1982
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1941
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2156
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2343
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2012
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2315
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2588
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2573
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2546
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2253
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	2045
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU · plus dur : 15 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03

68000 12,3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2117 · 543 parties · 61.8 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2117± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2263
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2150
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2165
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2245
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	15	5.5/15	36.7 %	+4/=3/−8	2159
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1949
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2156
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	3/16	18.8 %	+0/=6/−10	1966
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1919
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2028
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	11	3/11	27.3 %	+3/=0/−8	2012
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	2115
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	2045
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2365
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2160
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2223
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+2/=5/−4	2061
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2096
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+5/=3/−0	2351
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	2092
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2219
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	2086
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	22	12.5/22	56.8 %	+11/=3/−8	2125
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2173
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2287
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2137
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1970
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2073
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	6/9	66.7 %	+5/=2/−2	2085
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2147
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2301
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2221
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2261
Saitek President	1875	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2022
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2171
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2156
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1902
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2062
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2005
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2089
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2074
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1894
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1959
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 15 % vs Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Sapphire

Clipper C400 12,5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2096 · 526 parties · 59.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2096± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1743
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2216
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2034
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2124
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	15	3.5/15	23.3 %	+3/=1/−11	2047
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+4/=1/−7	2162
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2118
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	6	0.5/6	8.3 %	+0/=1/−5	1807
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	2/16	12.5 %	+1/=2/−13	1883
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2186
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1897
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1881
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1938
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2045
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1934
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2125
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2188
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	9	5/9	55.6 %	+3/=4/−2	2164
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	5/10	50.0 %	+2/=6/−2	2117
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+3/=1/−4	2052
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2163
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2219
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2194
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	22	11/22	50.0 %	+9/=4/−9	2077
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	7/12	58.3 %	+6/=2/−4	2111
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2237
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2064
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+1/=7/−2	1970
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2766
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+5/=3/−1	2130
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	2122
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2027
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	2027
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2391
Saitek President	1875	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2116
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2252
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2095
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	9	8.5/9	94.4 %	+8/=1/−0	2323
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2333
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2055
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2104
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	2067
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	9	7/9	77.8 %	+5/=4/−0	1991
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2026
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1831
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	9	8/9	88.9 %	+8/=0/−1	1938
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	9	9/9	100.0 %	+9/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL · plus dur : 12 % vs Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 100 % · cote Ordo 2096 · 263 parties · 68.8 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2096± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1893
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	2060
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1888
Mephisto RISC II	2221	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1883
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2135
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	8	4/8	50.0 %	+3/=2/−3	2174
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	7	2.5/7	35.7 %	+2/=1/−4	2023
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+0/=3/−5	1862
Novag Sapphire	2096	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+4/=1/−3	2140
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	8	4/8	50.0 %	+4/=0/−4	2092
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+4/=3/−1	2166
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2009
Novag Zircon II	1964	8	7/8	87.5 %	+6/=2/−0	2302
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2147
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2365
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2070
Saitek President	1875	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2066
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	1959
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	8	6/8	75.0 %	+5/=2/−1	2047
Novag Turquoise	1854	7	6/7	85.7 %	+5/=2/−0	2166
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	8	5/8	62.5 %	+4/=2/−2	1920
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2292
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	8	7.5/8	93.8 %	+7/=1/−0	2284
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	8	7/8	87.5 %	+7/=0/−1	2141
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2588
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2573
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2192
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2524
Saitek Prisma	1724	7	6.5/7	92.9 %	+6/=1/−0	2170
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	8	6.5/8	81.2 %	+6/=1/−1	1925
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	7	7/7	100.0 %	+7/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2032

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer Mach IV

68EC020 20 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2092 · 546 parties · 59.6 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo2092± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	3	0.5/3	16.7 %	+0/=1/−2	2263
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2277
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	2074
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	15	5/15	33.3 %	+4/=2/−9	2133
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1949
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	3.5/7	50.0 %	+2/=3/−2	2224
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	16	6/16	37.5 %	+4/=4/−8	2132
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2291
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2296
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1382
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1858
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1937
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2104
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1859
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2082
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2017
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	2117
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2026
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	4/8	50.0 %	+4/=0/−4	2096
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2055
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1979
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	22	11.5/22	52.3 %	+10/=3/−9	2093
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2354
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2237
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2099
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2804
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2156
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2205
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2103
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2027
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2027
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2120
Saitek President	1875	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2256
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2171
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1926
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2045
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	6	6/6	100.0 %	+6/=0/−0	2650
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1939
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1929
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2005
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2185
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2299
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2284
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	11	10/11	90.9 %	+9/=2/−0	2146
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1821
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	2253
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	1961
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU · plus dur : 0 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz

486DX 33 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2087 · 244 parties · 31.8 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2087± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2636
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Nimzo 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2750	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	2238
Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread	2674	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1874
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2370
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2176
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+1/=5/−5	2231
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1522
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+0/=5/−6	2102
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2266
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2072
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2251
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2034
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Mephisto RISC II	2221	11	3/11	27.3 %	+1/=4/−6	2050
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2028
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1399
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1992
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	2243
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2077
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1945
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2093
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1985
Novag Sapphire	2096	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+3/=1/−7	1964
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	2124
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2237
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2242
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1814
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2206
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2346
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2057
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2041

Meilleur : 90 % vs Novag Zircon II · plus dur : 0 % vs Rebel 6.0 — 1 Thread.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHzturbo

65C02 73 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2086 · 257 parties · 62.3 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2086± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	1	0.5/1	50.0 %	+0/=1/−0	2226
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2113
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2082
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	2027
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1978
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	2117
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1989
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2200
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	2126
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	2063
Novag Zircon II	1964	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1996
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2067
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1943
Saitek President	1875	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2386
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2252
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2656
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2022
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1969
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2603
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2089
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2014
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1937

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Constellation Forte A · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz

68020 + 68881 16 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2077 · 273 parties · 30.2 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2077± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2364
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	1/2	50.0 %	+0/=2/−0	2470
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2393
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	5	2/5	40.0 %	+2/=0/−3	2314
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2570
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2367
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	14	2/14	14.3 %	+1/=2/−11	2052
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2335
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1522
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	12	1/12	8.3 %	+0/=2/−10	1898
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3096
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	4	1.5/4	37.5 %	+1/=1/−2	2165
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2251
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	3026
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Mephisto RISC II	2221	25	7/25	28.0 %	+6/=2/−17	2057
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2410
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2390
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2373
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	12	3/12	25.0 %	+2/=2/−8	1988
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1873
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1945
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	21	8.5/21	40.5 %	+5/=7/−9	2058
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	22	9.5/22	43.2 %	+8/=3/−11	2069
Novag Sapphire	2096	22	11/22	50.0 %	+9/=4/−9	2096
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	22	10.5/22	47.7 %	+9/=3/−10	2076
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2087
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1246
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2666
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2650

Meilleur : 50 % vs Novag Sapphire · plus dur : 8 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHzturbo

65C02 91 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 2053 · 262 parties · 57.3 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2053± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	2183
Mephisto RISC II	2221	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+5/=1/−6	2192
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+7/=1/−3	2311
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	1962
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	12	4.5/12	37.5 %	+3/=3/−6	2036
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	1996
Novag Sapphire	2096	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2038
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1791
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2029
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	12	4/12	33.3 %	+4/=0/−8	1845
Novag Zircon II	1964	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	1964
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2338
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	12	8/12	66.7 %	+7/=2/−3	2040
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2120
Saitek President	1875	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2386
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2111
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2157
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	12	6.5/12	54.2 %	+5/=3/−4	1860
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1969
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2000
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2155
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1987

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Turbo King II (D+) · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU

ARM9 ARMv5TE 300 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 2046 · 254 parties · 40.6 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo2046± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2559
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2523
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2503
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2460
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2384
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2189
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2342
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1522
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2072
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2254
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2441
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2225
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2412
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2028
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	12	1.5/12	12.5 %	+1/=1/−10	1861
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	2/12	16.7 %	+0/=4/−8	1903
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1663
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2327
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+0/=7/−3	2017
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1876
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1906
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1901
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1896
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	2/2	100.0 %	+2/=0/−0	2877
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2411
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1858
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1964
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2756
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2110
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2070
Saitek President	1875	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2675
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1978
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1866
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2368
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1850

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek President · plus dur : 5 % vs Saitek Sparc (rev.518).

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer Mach III

68000 16 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 2029 · 505 parties · 53.8 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo2029± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
CrayBlitz_49h_uci — 1 Thread	2543	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1743
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1953
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1933
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1869
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	2191
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+0/=4/−3	2064
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2221
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	2102
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1382
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1988
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2114
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1934
Psion Chess 2.13 286 1800MHz QEMU	2160	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1969
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2006
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1978
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2009
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	2062
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+1/=3/−4	1959
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2022
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1874
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1989
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	6/12	50.0 %	+4/=4/−4	2053
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1665
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2075
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2267
Novag Zircon II	1964	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	1921
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2064
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2027
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2160
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2070
Saitek President	1875	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1945
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1870
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	8	8/8	100.0 %	+8/=0/−0	2666
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1856
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2045
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2232
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2022
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1969
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	1911
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1994
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2169
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1964
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1937
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	1882
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2152
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU

Pentium — PC émulé · cote Ordo 2004 · 343 parties · 49.0 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo2004± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2355
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1608
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	1	0/1	0.0 %	+0/=0/−1	1522
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1451
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1425
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2030
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2199
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1992
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	2032
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2178
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1793
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1336
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2152
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+2/=7/−1	2131
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1292
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	1.5/2	75.0 %	+1/=1/−0	2277
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2077
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1959
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2477
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1999
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1921
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1990
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2070
Saitek President	1875	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2386
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2252
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1866
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1964
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1850
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2213
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7/10	70.0 %	+4/=6/−0	1969
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2195
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1656
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2169
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2155
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2258
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2236
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1965
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1911

Meilleur : 95 % vs Fidelity Par Excellence (B) · plus dur : 0 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach IV.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL

68000 12 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1966 · 491 parties · 49.2 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1966± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1981
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1535
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	2038
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1985
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1753
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1919
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1817
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1671
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1797
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1965
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2067
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1851
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1934
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2009
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1296
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	3.5/8	43.8 %	+2/=3/−3	2052
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1901
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1846
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1989
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	8/12	66.7 %	+8/=0/−4	2173
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2154
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1728
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1493
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1999
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2026
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1920
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	2027
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2027
Saitek President	1875	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1840
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1800
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2666
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2157
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1962
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2151
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1902
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2012
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2005
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1994
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2089
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2014
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1937
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2026
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1744

Meilleur : 100 % vs Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Zircon II

H8/325 26,6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1964 · 480 parties · 49.0 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1964± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2062
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1823
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2124
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1739
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2073
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	2028
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	12	5/12	41.7 %	+4/=2/−6	2124
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	1818
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1876
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	2009
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1851
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	9	3/9	33.3 %	+2/=2/−5	1996
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+1/=3/−5	1931
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	1/8	12.5 %	+0/=2/−6	1758
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1851
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1705
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	2055
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	6/12	50.0 %	+5/=2/−5	2053
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2046
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	8	4.5/8	56.2 %	+3/=3/−2	2073
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1970
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1931
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	2026
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1920
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	2110
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1950
Saitek President	1875	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1910
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1941
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2057
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1926
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1784
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1997
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2072
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1892
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	9	8/9	88.9 %	+7/=2/−0	2175
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2044
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	1935
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2074
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1987
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	9	6.5/9	72.2 %	+6/=1/−2	1890
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	9	5.5/9	61.1 %	+5/=1/−3	1748
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	8	5.5/8	68.8 %	+5/=1/−2	1714
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Nigel Short

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1956 · 429 parties · 49.2 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1956± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1981
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	5/7	71.4 %	+4/=2/−1	2383
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1919
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1797
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1793
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1771
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1926
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	1931
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1905
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1945
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1705
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1671
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1246
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1921
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2039
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1895
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1894
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+8/=1/−2	2132
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	1884
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	2120
Saitek President	1875	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1728
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1835
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1936
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1964
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1820
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1997
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1978
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2123
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2325
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2029
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1964
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1778
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	2045
Saitek Prisma	1724	11	8.5/11	77.3 %	+7/=3/−1	1937
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1740
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	11/11	100.0 %	+11/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1959
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 0 % vs Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Maestro D++

65C02 (module, à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1920 · 430 parties · 48.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1920± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	2122
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1985
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	9	0.5/9	5.6 %	+0/=1/−8	1728
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1938
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1793
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1771
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1735
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1989
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1650
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1985
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1939
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	4/12	33.3 %	+3/=2/−7	1932
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1855
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1921
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1934
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1966
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1964
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1743
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2027
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1911
Saitek President	1875	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1728
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1978
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2167
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	2177
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1747
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2650
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1831
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1885
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1743
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1973
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1895
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2074
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2048
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1832
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2106
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1670
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU

286 16 MHz — PC émulé · cote Ordo 1919 · 283 parties · 47.0 % · err ±12

Cote Ordo1919± 12

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	3	0/3	0.0 %	+0/=0/−3	1542
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1872
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2150
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	2052
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1801
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1934
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1884
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1989
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1985
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1788
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1858
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1774
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	1991
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1812
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1880
Saitek President	1875	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2675
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	1835
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2047
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	1978
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2012
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2055
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1823
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1964
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1854
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1871
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1911

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek President · plus dur : 10 % vs MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super Expert C v3.6

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1880 · 420 parties · 44.8 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1880± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	2071
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1873
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1884
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1735
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1905
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1851
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	2022
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1812
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1855
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1814
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1818
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1894
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1715
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1888
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	1919
Saitek President	1875	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1840
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1835
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1795
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1856
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1925
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2041
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1978
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1929
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1921
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1911
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1753
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	11	7/11	63.6 %	+5/=4/−2	1870
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	11	10/11	90.9 %	+10/=0/−1	2146
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	11	10/11	90.9 %	+9/=2/−0	2124
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1810
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2237
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek President

6502 2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1875 · 424 parties · 43.3 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1875± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1933
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1919
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1988
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1984
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14 MHz	2153	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1641
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2017
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1970
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1905
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1711
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1575
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1541
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1246
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1959
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1493
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	2000
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1930
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	7/10	70.0 %	+5/=4/−1	2103
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2067
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1119
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1914
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1978
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1066
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2047
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	2156
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1468
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2072
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1856
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1961
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1838
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1823
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1920
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1854
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	9	7.5/9	83.3 %	+6/=3/−0	2004
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1689
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1971
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2152
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super Forte C v3.6

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1870 · 419 parties · 43.9 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1870± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2062
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1778
Mephisto RISC II	2221	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+1/=1/−7	1941
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1667
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	2067
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	2055
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1715
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2007
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1791
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1705
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1812
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1939
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	2029
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1623
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2036
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1894
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1991
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1812
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	1954
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1914
Saitek President	1875	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1767
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1675
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1724
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1854
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1920
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1978
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1892
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	1878
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1873
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1641
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1773
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1987
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1965
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+8/=3/−0	1990
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	8/11	72.7 %	+7/=2/−2	1747
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	11	10.5/11	95.5 %	+10/=1/−0	1761

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU

486DX 33 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 1866 · 302 parties · 41.2 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo1866± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2332
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2193
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2180
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2322
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1466
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1451
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1425
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2219
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1399
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1382
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1336
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1896
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1277
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1229
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1166
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1774
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1886
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1618
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1950
Saitek President	1875	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2675
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2061
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1891
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1850
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1724
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1892
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1623
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1873
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1935
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2014
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1937
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1965
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2181
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1831
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek President · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1856 · 430 parties · 38.7 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1856± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1714
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1839
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1877
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1934
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1317
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	2/8	25.0 %	+1/=2/−5	1905
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2022
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1286
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1751
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1535
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	5/10	50.0 %	+3/=4/−3	2029
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1897
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1664
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1894
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1848
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1599
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1728
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1880
Saitek President	1875	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1684
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	2002
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1831
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1889
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1779
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	1800
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1929
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1573
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1873
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1724
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1676
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1937
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1871
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1871
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1787
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1861
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1878
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Turquoise

65C02 (à confirmer) — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1854 · 344 parties · 43.3 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo1854± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1877
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	2104
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1824
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1785
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1901
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1858
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	2035
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1991
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	2027
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1809
Saitek President	1875	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1573
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1870
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1821
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1796
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1787
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1884
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1911
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2089
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1738
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1854
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1871
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1911
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1787
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1678
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto RISC II.

↑ retour au classement

Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz

ARM9 ARMv5TE 30 MHz — MAME · cote Ordo 1850 · 320 parties · 40.8 % · err ±11

Cote Ordo1850± 11

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Stockfish 11 ARM9 300MHz QEMU	3328	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2528
Stockfish 11 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	3150	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2350
ProDeo 3.1 — 1 Thread	3026	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2226
Fritz 8 UCI py — 1 Thread	2905	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2105
Ruffian 1.0.5 — 1 Thread	2858	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2058
Stockfish 11 ARM9 30MHz	2827	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	2027
Stockfish 11 486DX 33MHz QEMU	2791	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1991
Chess Genius 5 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2568	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1768
Chess Genius 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2566	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1766
Chess Genius 4 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2559	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1759
Chess Genius 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2555	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1755
Stockfish 11 68040 40MHz	2546	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1746
Chess Genius 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2523	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1723
Rebel 12 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2503	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1703
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 140MHz	2493	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1693
Rebel 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2470	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1670
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 150MHz	2460	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1660
Rebel 9 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2441	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1641
Fritz 3 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2408	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2217
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 32MHz	2393	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1593
Stockfish 11 68020 16MHz	2384	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1584
MChess 1.71 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 5 486DX 33MHz	2380	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1580
Chess Genius 4 486DX 33MHz	2370	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1570
Chess Genius 2 486DX 33MHz	2367	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1567
Chess Genius 3 486DX 33MHz	2358	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1558
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 32MHz	2347	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1547
Fruit 2.1 ARM9 30MHz	2342	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1542
Chess Genius 1 486DX 33MHz	2335	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1535
MChess Pro 6 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2322	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1522
The King 2.54 ChessMachine 14MHz	2296	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1496
MChess Pro 6 486DX 33MHz	2266	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	2075
Fritz 1 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2263	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1463
Fruit 2.1 68040 40MHz	2254	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1454
Fritz 3 486DX 33MHz	2251	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1451
Fritz 2 Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2225	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1425
Crafty 19.15 ARM9 30MHz	2221	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1421
Rebel 9 486DX 33MHz	2219	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1419
Rebel 6 486DX 33MHz	2199	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1399
MChess 1.71 486DX 33MHz	2182	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1382
Fritz 2 486DX 33MHz	2178	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1378
Gideon 3.1 ChessMachine 14MHz	2136	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1336
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	6	0/6	0.0 %	+0/=0/−6	1292
Fritz 1 486DX 33MHz	2087	2	0.5/2	25.0 %	+0/=1/−1	1896
Fruit 2.1 68020 16MHz	2077	2	0/2	0.0 %	+0/=0/−2	1277
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 300MHz QEMU	2046	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2046
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1647
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	2004
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1664
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1817
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1809
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1120
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1689
Saitek President	1875	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2256
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1800
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	2	1/2	50.0 %	+1/=0/−1	1866
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1926
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1902
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	2062
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1921
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+3/=5/−2	1838
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1935
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2155
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1817
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1915
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2025
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2470
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1787
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	1584

Meilleur : 100 % vs Fidelity Designer 2000 · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek Maestro D++.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto Modena (set 3)

65C02 4,2 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1831 · 421 parties · 40.5 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1831± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1925
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1919
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1667
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1934
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	2046
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	0.5/9	5.6 %	+0/=1/−8	1604
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	3/8	37.5 %	+2/=2/−4	2007
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1985
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1895
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	12	5.5/12	45.8 %	+4/=3/−5	2024
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1623
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1895
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1724
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1809
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1920
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1772
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1732
Saitek President	1875	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1634
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1723
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1973
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	1888
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1889
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1779
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1714
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1911
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	4/11	36.4 %	+1/=6/−4	1706
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1680
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2155
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1893
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	2026
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1794
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1752
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1606
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+5/=3/−3	1641
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM V (v5.1)

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1822 · 420 parties · 39.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1822± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1709
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1877
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1793
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1934
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1876
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1625
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1985
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1939
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1905
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1882
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	3/10	30.0 %	+0/=6/−4	1857
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1775
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1894
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1655
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1856
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1728
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1772
Saitek President	1875	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1840
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1800
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1795
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1748
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1889
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1609
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1939
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1706
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1756
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1676
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	11	6/11	54.5 %	+6/=0/−5	1778
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	11	9/11	81.8 %	+8/=2/−1	1985
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1915
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2228
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1599
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2440
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Novag Super VIP v3.7 · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo King II (D+)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1814 · 418 parties · 38.4 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1814± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1933
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	2/7	28.6 %	+2/=0/−5	2064
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1709
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1663
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1743
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1926
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1856
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	0.5/8	6.2 %	+0/=1/−7	1625
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1901
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1575
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1541
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	1932
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1623
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1775
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	1/9	11.1 %	+0/=2/−7	1603
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1444
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1990
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1678
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1772
Saitek President	1875	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1728
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	1806
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	2057
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	2097
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1784
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1742
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1734
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1929
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1885
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1837
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	1854
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1724
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1794
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1787
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1670
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	9	8/9	88.9 %	+8/=0/−1	2001
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2377
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Constellation Forte A

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1803 · 410 parties · 37.9 % · err ±10

Cote Ordo1803± 10

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+0/=2/−5	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1667
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1663
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1795
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	1/8	12.5 %	+1/=0/−7	1758
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1711
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1286
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	7/10	70.0 %	+6/=2/−2	2152
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1775
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1724
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	2026
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1749
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1990
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1772
Saitek President	1875	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1840
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1800
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1795
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1786
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1747
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+2/=5/−3	1815
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	11	7/11	63.6 %	+4/=6/−1	1928
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1822
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1814
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	3.5/11	31.8 %	+2/=3/−6	1655
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	1773
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	11	4/11	36.4 %	+3/=2/−6	1649
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1759
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1787
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1705
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1941
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1744

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)

65C02 4,9 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1788 · 419 parties · 35.9 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1788± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1844
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	1/7	14.3 %	+1/=0/−6	1912
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1709
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1934
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	1817
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1581
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1785
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1840
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1647
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1623
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1664
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	3/10	30.0 %	+1/=4/−5	1817
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1715
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1812
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1884
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1914
Saitek President	1875	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1840
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	2017
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1719
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1920
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1553
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1703
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1939
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	11	6/11	54.5 %	+5/=2/−4	1853
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1717
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	7.5/11	68.2 %	+6/=3/−2	1935
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1808
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1711
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1832
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1787
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	11	9.5/11	86.4 %	+9/=1/−1	1990
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1710
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1577
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1744

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer 2100

65C02 6 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1773 · 418 parties · 34.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1773± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1709
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1797
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1873
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1816
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	2/9	22.2 %	+0/=4/−5	1879
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1581
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1845
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1671
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1623
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1725
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1663
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1765
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1618
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1728
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	4/11	36.4 %	+2/=4/−5	1782
Saitek President	1875	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1728
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1870
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1625
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	1953
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1889
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1468
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1450
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	11	7/11	63.6 %	+7/=0/−4	1919
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+4/=1/−6	1750
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	5.5/11	50.0 %	+4/=3/−4	1803
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1753
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1817
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+4/=5/−1	1832
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1759
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1824
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2051
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	2089
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1738
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Simultano (ver. B)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1746 · 419 parties · 31.5 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1746± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1714
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1709
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1663
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1605
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1585
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1650
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	1/11	9.1 %	+0/=2/−9	1692
Fidelity Par Excellence (B) 73 MHz	2086	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1895
Novag Constellation Forte A 91 MHz	2053	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1812
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1493
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1775
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1724
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	5/11	45.5 %	+4/=2/−5	1924
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1618
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1812
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	1/11	9.1 %	+1/=0/−10	1480
Saitek President	1875	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1767
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1629
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1675
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1665
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1747
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1779
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1684
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	11	5/11	45.5 %	+5/=0/−6	1790
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1706
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	11	7/11	63.6 %	+6/=2/−3	1900
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1823
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1702
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1795
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1724
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1682
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	2051
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	8/10	80.0 %	+6/=4/−0	1881
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+7/=2/−1	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1744

Meilleur : 95 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04.

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Par Excellence (B)

65C02 5 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1724 · 397 parties · 30.2 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1724± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1851
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1839
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1934
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1596
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1317
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1795
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	4/11	36.4 %	+4/=0/−7	1995
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1493
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1664
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	2.5/9	27.8 %	+2/=1/−6	1798
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1635
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1812
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1772
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	1/11	9.1 %	+0/=2/−9	1480
Saitek President	1875	9	1.5/9	16.7 %	+0/=3/−6	1595
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1763
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1625
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1709
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1664
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1659
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1530
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	11	2/11	18.2 %	+1/=2/−8	1560
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1814
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1838
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1823
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+1/=5/−4	1665
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1676
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+5/=3/−2	1832
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1908
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+5/=5/−0	1861
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1675
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	8/10	80.0 %	+8/=0/−2	1818
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1628
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Novag Star Diamond (v1.04).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Prisma

H8/325 20 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1724 · 399 parties · 29.2 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1724± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	2035
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1374
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1804
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1947
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1715
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0.5/7	7.1 %	+0/=1/−6	1650
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1563
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1838
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1764
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1584
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1583
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+1/=3/−7	1743
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1538
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1812
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1914
Saitek President	1875	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1910
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1629
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1758
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1709
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1707
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1549
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1761
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1631
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1743
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1768
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1680
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1738
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1746
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1617
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1824
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	3/10	30.0 %	+3/=0/−7	1523
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1570
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+6/=3/−1	1628
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Genius 68030 London.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHzturbo

HD6301Y0 125 MHz — cb-emu, accélérée · cote Ordo 1717 · 150 parties · 51.0 % · err ±16

Cote Ordo1717± 16

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1786
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1796
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1310
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	4/10	40.0 %	+4/=0/−6	1743
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1733
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1717
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+2/=3/−5	1665
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+5/=1/−4	1781
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1533
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1616
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1740
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	2022
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	7.5/10	75.0 %	+7/=1/−2	1768
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1819
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9/10	90.0 %	+9/=0/−1	1614

Meilleur : 90 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 5 % vs Mephisto MM V (v5.1).

↑ retour au classement

Fidelity Designer 2000

65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1670 · 398 parties · 25.3 % · err ±9

Cote Ordo1670± 9

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1803
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1663
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1605
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1296
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	1.5/8	18.8 %	+1/=1/−6	1841
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1292
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	2.5/11	22.7 %	+2/=1/−8	1816
Cray Blitz 49h Pentium 90MHz QEMU	2004	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1764
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1166
Novag Zircon II	1964	9	3.5/9	38.9 %	+3/=1/−5	1886
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1886
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1920
Psion Chess 2.13 286 16MHz QEMU	1919	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1678
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1368
Saitek President	1875	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1573
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+0/=3/−8	1549
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1354
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1665
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1614
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1050
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	11	6.5/11	59.1 %	+6/=1/−4	1895
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	6/10	60.0 %	+4/=4/−2	1892
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	5/10	50.0 %	+4/=2/−4	1814
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1768
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1467
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1391
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1365
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+0/=5/−5	1533
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	7/10	70.0 %	+7/=0/−3	1871
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1646
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1605
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	6.5/10	65.0 %	+6/=1/−3	1685
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	9.5/10	95.0 %	+9/=1/−0	1949
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	10/10	100.0 %	+10/=0/−0	2032

Meilleur : 100 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz.

↑ retour au classement

Novag Super VIP v3.7

HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1640 · 378 parties · 20.9 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo1640± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	2014
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1374
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1317
Novag Sapphire	2096	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1906
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	11	1.5/11	13.6 %	+1/=1/−9	1772
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1517
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1725
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1724
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1156
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1679
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1709
Saitek President	1875	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1363
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1629
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1675
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1615
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1707
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1703
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1530
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1022
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	9	1/9	11.1 %	+1/=0/−8	1453
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1502
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	4/10	40.0 %	+2/=4/−4	1717
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1532
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	2/10	20.0 %	+0/=4/−6	1505
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+4/=1/−5	1689
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	6/10	60.0 %	+6/=0/−4	1794
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1335
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1705
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	4.5/10	45.0 %	+3/=3/−4	1542
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+7/=3/−0	1738
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	9/10	90.0 %	+8/=2/−0	1614

Meilleur : 90 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03.

↑ retour au classement

Tandy Chess Champion 2150

65C02 3 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1577 · 376 parties · 17.7 % · err ±8

Cote Ordo1577± 8

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1697
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1374
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1613
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1735
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	1/9	11.1 %	+1/=0/−8	1735
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1851
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1166
Novag Zircon II	1964	8	2.5/8	31.2 %	+2/=1/−5	1827
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1574
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1679
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1639
Saitek President	1875	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1075
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	11	3/11	27.3 %	+2/=2/−7	1700
Cray Blitz 49h 486DX 33MHz QEMU	1866	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1625
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1555
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1664
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1609
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	11	4.5/11	40.9 %	+3/=3/−5	1767
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1022
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1014
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	5/10	50.0 %	+5/=0/−5	1788
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1261
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1505
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	2/10	20.0 %	+2/=0/−8	1483
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1533
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+2/=1/−7	1526
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	3.5/10	35.0 %	+3/=1/−6	1562
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	5.5/10	55.0 %	+4/=3/−3	1675
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1507
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	8.5/10	85.0 %	+8/=1/−1	1533

Meilleur : 85 % vs Saitek Leonardo (v1.4) · plus dur : 0 % vs Fidelity Designer Mach III.

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Turbo 16K

HD6301Y0 8 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1437 · 368 parties · 8.6 % · err ±6

Cote Ordo1437± 6

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1426
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1374
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1735
Novag Sapphire	2096	9	0/9	0.0 %	+0/=0/−9	1296
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1581
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1166
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1164
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1444
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1408
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1080
Saitek President	1875	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1363
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1488
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1344
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	2/10	20.0 %	+1/=2/−7	1614
Cray Blitz 49h ARM9 30MHz	1850	10	3/10	30.0 %	+2/=2/−6	1703
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1320
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1440
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1432
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1276
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1472
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1365
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1533
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	2.5/10	25.0 %	+1/=3/−6	1533
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1335
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1158
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+0/=3/−7	1339
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1507
Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)	1232	10	4/10	40.0 %	+3/=2/−5	1162

Meilleur : 40 % vs Tandy Chess Champion 2150 · plus dur : 0 % vs Saitek Sparc (rev.518).

↑ retour au classement

Saitek Leonardo (v1.4)

HD6303Y 12 MHz — cb-emu · cote Ordo 1232 · 357 parties · 3.5 % · err ±4

Cote Ordo1232± 4

Adversaire	Cote	Pt.	Score	%	W/D/L	Perf
Mephisto Genius 68030 London	2363	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1563
Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020	2315	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1515
Novag Star Diamond (v1.04)	2226	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1697
Mephisto Dallas 68000-UCI	2224	7	0/7	0.0 %	+0/=0/−7	1424
Mephisto RISC II	2221	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1421
Saitek RISC 2500 v1.04	2179	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1379
Saitek Sparc (rev.518)	2174	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1374
Fidelity Elite Avantgarde V9	2125	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1325
Mephisto Berlin 68000 v0.03	2117	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1317
Novag Sapphire	2096	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1296
Mephisto MM5 (v5.1)-UCI	2096	8	0/8	0.0 %	+0/=0/−8	1296
Fidelity Designer Mach IV	2092	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1292
Fidelity Designer Mach III	2029	11	0/11	0.0 %	+0/=0/−11	1229
Mephisto Mondial 68000 XL	1966	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1454
Novag Zircon II	1964	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1164
Mephisto Nigel Short	1956	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1156
Saitek Maestro D++	1920	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1120
Novag Super Expert C v3.6	1880	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1080
Saitek President	1875	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1075
Novag Super Forte C v3.6	1870	11	0.5/11	4.5 %	+0/=1/−10	1341
Saitek Corona II (ver. D+)	1856	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1056
Novag Turquoise	1854	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1054
Mephisto Modena (set 3)	1831	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1031
Mephisto MM V (v5.1)	1822	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1022
Saitek Turbo King II (D+)	1814	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	1014
Novag Constellation Forte A	1803	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1291
Mephisto MM IV (v7.10)	1788	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1276
Fidelity Designer 2100	1773	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	973
Saitek Simultano (ver. B)	1746	10	0.5/10	5.0 %	+0/=1/−9	1235
Fidelity Par Excellence (B)	1724	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	924
Saitek Prisma	1724	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	924
Saitek Turbo 16K 125 MHz	1717	10	1/10	10.0 %	+1/=0/−9	1335
Fidelity Designer 2000	1670	10	0/10	0.0 %	+0/=0/−10	870
Novag Super VIP v3.7	1640	10	1/10	10.0 %	+0/=2/−8	1258
Tandy Chess Champion 2150	1577	10	1.5/10	15.0 %	+1/=1/−8	1276
Saitek Turbo 16K	1437	10	6/10	60.0 %	+5/=2/−3	1507

Meilleur : 60 % vs Saitek Turbo 16K · plus dur : 0 % vs Mephisto Berlin Pro 68020.

↑ retour au classement

Post Views: 10